Intel security flaws put laptops, servers and storage at risk of hacking

By
Intel security flaws put laptops, servers and storage at risk of hacking

Bugs in Intel's firmware allow remote code execution, data exfiltration and more.

Bugs in the underlying firmware of multiple Intel chip families have left laptops, servers and storage appliances vulnerable to a number of security vulnerabilities, the company has admitted.

The silicon giant has confirmed reports from third-party security researchers that flaws in its chips' management and administration functions could potentially allow hackers to execute code, exfiltrate confidential data and more.

Intel launched a full internal review of its source code after it was alerted to the issues, finding that bugs in affected systems could allow attackers to "load and execute arbitrary code outside the visibility of the user and operating system [and] cause a system crash or system instability".

The flaws affect a wide variety of chip families, including 6th, 7th and 8th Generation Intel Core processors, Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5 and v6 processors, Intel Xeon Scalable processors, Intel Xeon W processors, Intel Atom C3000 processors, Apollo Lake Intel Atom E3900 series, Apollo Lake Intel Pentiums, and Celeron N and J series processors.

This covers everything from laptops and 2-in-1s, all the way up to high-end servers and storage appliances. The company has released a free detection tool, which users and sysadmins can run to identify vulnerable machines. IT Pro has contacted Intel to try and determine the number of affected systems.

Three elements of Intel's firmware are vulnerable: the company's Management Engine (ME) Server Platform Services (SPS) and Trusted Execution Engine (TXE). The Management Engine runs underneath the OS, and is used by admins to remotely access a system for maintenance and management tasks. The Server Platform Services feature is based on the ME and offers similar features for server products, while the TXE deals with hardware authentication.

The ME allows anyone with the appropriate credentials to control desktops, make changes to the system's settings and configurations, and even reinstall the OS. This makes it a very useful tool for IT staff at large companies with multiple offices, but it also means it holds a huge amount of power that hackers could take control of.

Because it runs underneath the OS, the ME is invisible to any antivirus systems or hypervisors installed on the machine. Coupled with its highly-privileged status, this means that a compromised ME could be used to install malware, among other troubling things.

A security advisory issued by Intel stated that 80% of the ten CVEs relating to the flaws are designated as high-severity, with buffer overflows and privilege escalations seen throughout.

"Based on the items identified through the comprehensive security review," the advisory read, "an attacker could gain unauthorized access to platform, Intel ME feature, and 3rd party secrets protected by the Intel Management Engine (ME), Intel Server Platform Service (SPS), or Intel Trusted Execution Engine (TXE)."

Intel has released a patch for the bugs, but its availability may be held up by hardware manufacturers, who will have to approve and sign it before it can be installed on their machines. While Lenovo and Fujitsu have already issued firmware patches addressing the vulnerability, it may take longer for other OEMs to offer fixes. We've contacted Dell EMC to ask when a patch will be available for its Intel systems.

This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk

Copyright © ITPro, Dennis Publishing
Tags:

Most Read Articles

Review: Sony Xperia XZ1

Review: Sony Xperia XZ1

Ex-Bioware writer David Gaider on representation in games

Ex-Bioware writer David Gaider on representation in games

Three ways to rip and digitise your DVD collection

Three ways to rip and digitise your DVD collection

YouTube to take on Spotify with YouTube Remix in 2018

YouTube to take on Spotify with YouTube Remix in 2018

Would you like to receive

Our Newsletter?