search PCA
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

XP vs. VISTA Options · View
OZSlayer
Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:23:17 AM

Rank: Troubleshooter

Joined: 5/29/2008
Posts: 40
Hi mate,

Office 2007 (bit off topic)

I have only installed it on new systems and not upgraded anyone at this point. I find my customers are less likely to upgrade early if they are happy with the existing version. When new systems are added ten they go with the 2007 version.

The compatibility pack the MS put out works well when adding a new system to a domain with 2003 Office or earlier version.

The Microsoft Office code writers are separate from the Vista team and are quicker to respond and help sort issues with Office and always have been in the past. They are coding mainly for the higher end of the market which is reflected in the pricing and quality of their first release's.

Make sure you install all the patches to keep your system secure. As always this is the way as hackers find new ways to get in.

bbjai
Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:23:21 AM
Rank: Technician

Joined: 4/28/2008
Posts: 253
ah yes
because I work for a fairly large firm in the city and they have been talking about adopting Office 2007. Personally I've used it for a while and I've found it was alot better then 2003 (go the $75 Office 2007 ultimate offer for school and university people).

I find it amazing that the Vista response has far outweighed the brilliant product that Office 2007 is. I thought it might get the same negative response that Vista may have also received. But I guess not. Personally I don't mind Vista at the moment. I mean I understand where your coming from with your discussion on drivers being that Vista is unstable. But I look at the entire section of Wireless network PCI cards and I find little or no drivers for Vista 64 Bit. We aren't even talking about 32 Bit. With the massive advent of 4GB ram and in the near future 8GB you would figure they would make drivers for the only good stable 64 Bit OS out there. My friend has been using it for a while and it hasn't really given him that many problems.

I fail to see why they don't make drivers for it to be honest, for something so simple as a PCI Wireless card which most people would be looking to put on their new machine (which happens to most probably ship with Vista)
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:12:32 PM

Rank: Moderator

Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 806
Location: Sydney, Australia
OZSlayer wrote:

I hope you are talking from many years of working experience in the PC trade which could be hard seeing you are only 17. lol. Don't be afraid to listen especially if you want to be a creditable PC article writer.

Age means nothing. I have 10 years of experience, and a good part of this has been with trained professionals and enthusiasts. I personally find Vista to be the better OS, provided you check for compatibility issues before committing to it. If you want to keep XP, that's fine, but there's no doubt that Vista is the better OS for new PCs. I find Vista more stable than XP too. Yes it is slower in some regards, but overall it's a more pleasurable experience. Even that link proves that there's basically no gaming performance difference, unless you have an older system which requires low-detail. Then again, I recommended XP for low-end PCs. I know many PC designers which insist on Vista, and they have several years of experience. Wink

Edited by .:Cyb3rGlitch:.: 24/7/2008 04:13:35 PM

Vito Cassisi: Tech Blog
chava
Posted: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:11:10 PM
Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 5/3/2008
Posts: 3
It is pretty simple , why many people opt for xp instead of vista, First of all vista takes away alot of the freedom xp has given the personal computer user. a good analogy is firefox vs IE . xp can suit various user being user friendly with good security. Vista takes up more of the cpu,memory,speed, with out reliability, and compatibility. thus making it slower than xp.vista is loaded with bugs, while xp has learned to be ammune. Sure vista looks good, but whats under the hood that counts when its a race for time and dependability. Hasta la vista, vista
Jim.Dude
Posted: Saturday, July 26, 2008 1:11:09 AM

Rank: Authority

Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 317
Location: NSW
Bah, pointless discussion. Windows 7 will be released long before Vista Pista ever improves enough to kill off XP.

Despite the spiraling cost of living, it remains a popular activity.
geller
Posted: Saturday, July 26, 2008 10:36:50 AM

Rank: Enthusiast

Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 79
Jim.Dude wrote:
Bah, pointless discussion. Windows 7 will be released long before Vista Pista ever improves enough to kill off XP.


you may be right, thought it's looking like 2010 - Windows 7 on track for 2010
Jim.Dude
Posted: Saturday, July 26, 2008 11:24:21 AM

Rank: Authority

Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 317
Location: NSW
Looks like they've finally learned their lesson as well, sell when it's ready and not before!

"...if I wanted to start selling Windows 7 today, we'd start selling Windows 7 today. Then you'd complain..."



Despite the spiraling cost of living, it remains a popular activity.
Slatts
Posted: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:24:12 PM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,190
Location: Mackay North QLD
Remember people. We're talking microsoft time here.
5 MS seconds, 4 MS seconds, 5 MS min, etc.

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
ShinHito
Posted: Monday, July 28, 2008 9:43:58 AM
Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 7/28/2008
Posts: 1
I don't care if it's Vista or XP.. Since both can let me connect to the internet so I can post this comment( hoping for the lenovo notebook XD )
vjay
Posted: Friday, August 08, 2008 7:45:49 PM

Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 23
Location: Victoria
Without reading all of the above commentary I'll throw my 2 cents in and say that XP is a lot better than Vista in my opinion. On my laptop with 2GB DDR2 2.0 duo core etc etc etc Vista ran a lot slower on it than my 'ancient' 5+ yo desktop with 1GB DDR P4 running XP. I gave myself 2 months using Vista so I would have experience with it before I got sick of it and installed XP on the laptop and have never been happier. I predict the next Windows OS will be a major improvement and Vista will be referred to as Windows Me version 2 if it isn't already and be ditched asap by anyone who was lumbered with it on their new at the time operating system.

~This life must be a trial run because for the real event they'd hand out the instruction manual~
id10t error
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:19:45 PM

Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 8/13/2008
Posts: 3
I’m a rocket scientist with a post graduate diploma in brain surgery, but I managed to spend a day at tafe a while ago so now I’m an ‘IT consultant’ for hire.
I love reading these debates that come up all over the web and seeing how many other IT specialists (TFPIC) that are out there willing to give there honest and renowned appraisal of the XP/VISTA showdown. Please continue to vent your spleens in vigor at the misgivings of pro VISTA mob. Well I don’t know if being a system home builder qualifies for much in the IT wisdom stakes (probably not), but for what it’s worth I have had nothing but bliss from this OS since February. Yep my walls are still upright and the sky is hasn’t hit me yet. Everything I used on my trusty old XP box runs on me new slick VISTA cube and then some. It loads much quicker, IE7 is faster and it looks great on my LCD. Games run, office runs, ATO software runs, everything adobe runs; I could go on and on and on. So from my muched hyped POV, VISTA ROCKS BABY, (you can quote me on that last statement). So bring on the flames...
Slatts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:43:28 PM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,190
Location: Mackay North QLD
Hey I've got an idea.
Let's not bite.Not talking

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:23:14 PM

Rank: Moderator

Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 806
Location: Sydney, Australia
Slatts wrote:
Hey I've got an idea.
Let's not bite.Not talking

+1.

Any flaming and this thread is as good as locked.

Vito Cassisi: Tech Blog
OZSlayer
Posted: Sunday, August 17, 2008 10:52:21 AM

Rank: Troubleshooter

Joined: 5/29/2008
Posts: 40
Microsoft managed to sell an estimated 300,000 copies of Windows XP in the operating system's launch week. In the first week they hit the shelves, Windows 98 was sold in over 400,000 copies. Some 25,000 copies of Windows Vista have been sold every day for a forecasted total of 125,000 in the first week. That is less than even Windows 2000 that scratched the 200,000 units sold milestone. In this context, Vista sales are affected by the operating system's hardware requirements.

Microsoft took a large bite of humble pie this week, announcing that it will continue to support Windows XP until 2014. That’s an unprecedented 13 years from the operating system’s release, a new record for Microsoft’s support of an operating system. It will take the form of critical updates and security patches, but there was no mention of major service pack releases.

Hinting at Microsoft’s embarrassment over the announcement, the news was released via a letter sent from Microsoft senior VP Bill Veghte to customers, rather than a formal press release. Within the letter, Mr Veghte claimed that “Our ongoing support for Windows XP is the result of our recognition that people keep their Windows-based PCs for many years”. Sounds nice, but the truth isn’t quite as charitable. The fact is that Vista simply hasn’t penetrated businesses as quickly as Microsoft would have liked, with many choosing to stick with the proven stability and lower hardware demands of Windows XP.

A senior executive at HP has said that sales of systems of Windows XP still make up the majority, despite the operating system being officially withdrawn from sale in June.

Jane Bradburn, market development manager of commercial notebooks for HP Australia, told media that the company was still selling XP machines, but issuing a Vista licence for them. This casts serious doubts over claims from Microsoft that Vista is selling well.

"From the 30th of June, we have no longer been able to ship a PC with a XP licence," she said.

"However, what we have been able to do with Microsoft is ship PCs with a Vista Business licence but with XP pre-loaded. That is still the majority of business computers we are selling today."

This would mean that in Microsoft’s books the sales would show up as a sale of Vista.

Rob Kingston, group manager of commercial product marketing for HP said: " Looking into a crystal ball, I don't think businesses will see much value in upgrading to Vista until late next year and, even so, Microsoft will probably have come out with something else by then."

Companies are not the only ones less than enamoured with the operating system. Developers are it too.

The news backs up research by Forrester Research analyst Thomas Mendel, which estimates that only 8.8 per cent of enterprises have adopted Vista. This led to an angry response from Microsoft on its Vista blog, claiming that it had sold over 180 million copies of Vista.

“Given that there's a mountain of evidence to refute this report – including multiple reports from Forrester and other top-tier analysts – this appears to be more focused on making sensationalist statements rather than offering a thoughtful industry perspective based on conversations with IT operations professionals or deep knowledge of enterprise deployment cycles,” it said.

“How is this useful guidance to customers? It's disappointing to see such a respected organisation like Forrester take this approach.”


The market has spoken and Vista is still being out sold by XP, I wonder why. lol
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Posted: Sunday, August 17, 2008 12:13:43 PM

Rank: Moderator

Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 806
Location: Sydney, Australia
OZSlayer wrote:

The market has spoken and Vista is still being out sold by XP, I wonder why. lol


Easy. Because XP works, and implementing a new OS means downtime. It has nothing to do with the quality of Vista.

Vito Cassisi: Tech Blog
mobilus
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2008 6:37:57 PM
Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 4/19/2008
Posts: 2
I recently ugraded to a high end Dell XPS730 with a quadcore cpu but don't find Vista Ultimate friendly or speedy. It goes to sleep while working and refuses to wake up. Office 2007 programs continually "stop working" and close with the message Windows is trying to find a solution - a restart is the only solution available. It's incredible that MS can't get their own applications to work with Vista! Windows Explorer in XP and previous used to inheret the properties (title, subject, etc) in PDF files and display these but now one has to open the file's properties to see these. My network keeps going missing and I can't connect to external drives or laptop, but then mysteriously reappears from time to time [over a Belkin N1 router]. It is definitely better to activate the Administrator account in order to load new programs, but I've had to buy upgraded versions. I had to go to a beta version of F-Secure-2009 to overcome problems. I had to abandon Steganos Privacy Suite 2008 because the Activation program did not like my setup and tech support couldn't supply an answer. Add-ins to Outlook 2007 and Word and Excell are tempremental at best.
Slatts
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2008 7:41:42 PM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,190
Location: Mackay North QLD
At the moment I'm down on XP big time. This machine boots to MUP.sys then freezes. It'll boot into safe mode and I've tried rolling back to a previous save with no joy. It still boots into Linux as well which is what I'm typing this in with the you beaut seamonkey browser. I'm going to try booting into the command prompt, rename mup.sys and loading a copy from a backup partition. Wish me luck. I'm going in!Pray
Of course if that dosen't work you'll be seeing me in tech supportSad

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
pallen
Posted: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:56:05 PM
Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 8/25/2008
Posts: 2
I certainly don't recommend upgrading to Vista! Any product that doesn't have obvious benefits and sell itself but instead leaves folk having to ask others for reasons(excuses/justification?) to upgrade has not come of age! Maybe when a future Vista (SP2,3,4 ...) with hardware that won't balk at running it comes along I'll change my mind.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Posted: Monday, August 25, 2008 4:23:24 PM

Rank: Moderator

Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 806
Location: Sydney, Australia
pallen wrote:
Any product that doesn't have obvious benefits and sell itself but instead leaves folk having to ask others for reasons(excuses/justification?) to upgrade has not come of age!

1. DirectX10
2. Much better security (compared to XP)
3. Native multi-core support in CPU schedualer

In other words, without it, you might as well stick to an older PC.

Vito Cassisi: Tech Blog
Jim.Dude
Posted: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:38:01 PM

Rank: Authority

Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 317
Location: NSW
.:Cyb3rGlitch:. wrote:
pallen wrote:
Any product that doesn't have obvious benefits and sell itself but instead leaves folk having to ask others for reasons(excuses/justification?) to upgrade has not come of age!

1. DirectX10
2. Much better security (compared to XP)
3. Native multi-core support in CPU schedualer

In other words, without it, you might as well stick to an older PC.


DirectX 10 is crap...hell, it's going to be run over by DX11 before it even becomes mainstream! Poor DX10, it must feel so unloved. Boo hoo!

Despite the spiraling cost of living, it remains a popular activity.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS