search PCA
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

government filtering of the internet Options · View
Slatts
Posted: Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:40:02 AM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,172
Location: Mackay North QLD
I caught an interesting interview of the communications minister Senator Stephan Conroy on radio national this morning. I think that if you're interested in the interwebs, you may like to listen to it. I find it just a little disturbing.

These are Senator Conroy's contact details if you feel inclined to make your views known to him.

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
mordie
Posted: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:53:16 AM

Rank: Technician

Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 221
Location: Melbourne
As someone said yesterday elsewhere: "welcome to China!" ...

The thing that is a major sticking point of this whole ISP level Filtering is that the government "deems" what is to be filtered... So really they could end up filtering everything...

In the late 90's before I moved into IT I was working in Libraries in the TAFE system in Western Australia around the time they trailed a filter ...it was pretty much a word filter system that blocked words from a list entered into the software. It got canned as nursing and child care studies could not do any research as it was blocking a heap of sites.

In the early 2000's I went to a ALIA run meeting on Net filters at the State Library of Victoria and they compared filters / net nanny's of the time and found that they where still using user entered lists to block sites - Funny part was these filters where even filtering out political sites of the opp party at the time and some other organisations that where actually communtiy aid related..

No filter is going to be fool proof... I can see some DNS and proxy workaround occuring; etc...

we are not china but the PM speaks it and wants the same system they have there... I think alot of people are going to be voting against them next election with this type of BS ...

Sad state ...1984 coming soon to Australia




...madness be my friend...
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Posted: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:16:23 PM

Rank: Moderator

Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 802
Location: Sydney, Australia
Typical ignorant government. I think I know what my next tutorial will be...

Vito Cassisi: Tech Blog
Nat.W¿LL¿
Posted: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:02:58 PM

Rank: Expert

Joined: 5/29/2008
Posts: 688
Location: Lismore NSW
mhm i concur there. pretty shit its gonna drag australias already poor internet quality down even more further. i suggest a riotTwisted!

We are all born ignorant but one must work hard to remain stupid
Slatts
Posted: Saturday, November 01, 2008 3:30:12 PM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,172
Location: Mackay North QLD
It's starting to look like this crap isn't going to fly.

I get a sneaky suspicion that Conroy may have thrown this game. In the interview on radio national he sounded like a rank amateur. I suspect the filter thing was one of those promises that get thrown in in the heat of an election. Rather than talk about core promises like someone else we all know, he sold the idea in such a way that it'd be howled down and buried.
Makes sense to me.

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
Nat.W¿LL¿
Posted: Saturday, November 01, 2008 3:50:23 PM

Rank: Expert

Joined: 5/29/2008
Posts: 688
Location: Lismore NSW
Slatts wrote:
Rather than talk about core promises like someone else we all know

lol who would that be?
haha whats this suppose to mean? "I will accept some debate around what should and should not be on the internet - I am not a wowser," is that suppose to be browser? loser maybe?

Edited by Nat.W¿LL¿: 1/11/2008 03:53:23 PM

We are all born ignorant but one must work hard to remain stupid
Slatts
Posted: Saturday, November 01, 2008 4:22:12 PM

Rank: Elite
Moderator

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 1,172
Location: Mackay North QLD
Nat.W¿LL¿ wrote:
haha whats this suppose to mean? "I will accept some debate around what should and should not be on the internet - I am not a wowser," is that suppose to be browser? loser maybe?Edited by Nat.W¿LL¿: 1/11/2008 03:53:23 PM


Loosely translated, I think it means,"come on people, give me something to use to make this crap go away."

Edited by Slatts: 1/11/2008 04:26:23 PM

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it's a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

Ask questions. There's no such thing as a stupid one, just stupid answers. (mostly)
Neodude112320
Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:17:39 PM

Rank: I'm new around here

Joined: 6/4/2008
Posts: 22
Quote:
mhm i concur there. pretty shit its gonna drag australias already poor internet quality down even more further. i suggest a riotTwisted!


Excactly! I'm still waiting for telstra to upgrade our nearby exchange to ADSL2+ Sad
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS