The Apple iPad 2 reviewed: why it's our A-List tablet

Recommended
The Apple iPad 2 reviewed: why it's our A-List tablet
Rating
Overall:

Our review of the iPad 2 shows it is thinner, lighter and more powerful than the first iPad, with better battery life to boot - but the cameras are a letdown

Performance:
5
Features & Design:
5
Value for Money:
5
Price
Price: $579
> Pricing info

[This review was first published in the July 2011 issue of PC & Tech Authority. We've republished it here so you can read the full review online.]

We were sceptical when Apple launched the original iPad, but it’s proved a roaring success. Where previous attempts at tablet computing have repeatedly stalled (anyone remember the MID?), Apple got it just right, completely reinvigorating the tablet market in the process.

While manufacturers of other tablets are still struggling to produce a credible rival (the upcoming Motorola Xoom looks set to be the best effort so far), Apple has already moved on to its next generation. In typical Apple fashion, the iPad 2 isn’t a massive overhaul but a refinement, leaving much of the original intact. It looks very similar, the screen is the same 9.7in, 1024 x 768 IPS unit as before, and even where significant new features have been added (the cameras, for instance), there’s plenty of room for improvement.
 
Physical design
Say what you like about Apple’s drip-feed approach to new features, there’s no denying that this is a worthy update. To start with, the new iPad is smaller and lighter than before: it weighs just a whisker over 600g and measures a mere 8.8mm thick.
 
Its slenderness is striking. The new iPad is actually half a millimetre slimmer than the iPhone 4, and 4.6mm thinner than the original iPad. That’s some feat of engineering, and with its lighter weight and flat back the iPad 2 feels significantly more comfortable in the hand than the original.

The overall shape has been tweaked slightly, with the aluminium rear panel flattened out and edges that gently curve up to meet the edge of the screen. The speaker grille has moved from the bottom-right edge to the bottom-left, and is now a rectangular patch of pinhole perforations. It feels closer to a giant iPod touch than to the squared-off design of the iPhone 4 or first-generation iPad.

The controls have been wisely left alone, though: the home button remains bottom-centre, with the volume and hold switch on the right top edge. The power switch remains on the top edge on the right-hand side, with the 3.5mm headphone/mic socket opposite it along the same edge; Apple’s proprietary USB interface stays on the bottom edge.
 
Performance

The iPad2 (bottom) is 4.6mm thinner than the original iPad.
 
There are more changes under the hood, with an updated CPU, a new GPU and a doubling of the original iPad’s RAM allocation to 512MB.
 
The CPU is the most interesting update, replacing the single-core 1GHz Apple A4 processor with the dual-core A5. In real-world use it’s immediately obvious that the iPad 2 is a faster and more responsive device than its predecessor. Applications seem to launch more quickly, websites appear in the blink of an eye, and the iTunes Store and App Store feel snappy.

This is no mere impression. We upgraded the first iPad to iOS 4.3 (the same version as the iPad 2) and ran tests with the two iPads side by side. In BBC iPlayer, programmes consistently launched a couple of seconds more quickly on the iPad 2. The ABC website loaded in an average of five seconds; two seconds quicker than the first iPad. The SunSpider JavaScript benchmark completed in 2108ms compared with 3450ms on the older hardware.

It’s even more impressive when compared to its Android rivals. Even the original iPad had a significant edge over the Tegra 2-based Android tablets we’ve seen, and the extra CPU core gives a further boost – although it still can’t match the browsing speed of even the most modest desktop PC or laptop.
 
Gaming
The benefit of the new GPU is more difficult to measure. Apple claims it’s nine times faster than the first iPad, although games on that platform already enjoyed rich graphics and smooth frame rates. We expect that games enhanced for iPad 2 will use the extra power for advanced effects such as anti-aliasing, more detailed textures and the like.

We tested Infinity Blade, one of a handful of enhanced-for-iPad 2 titles available at launch, and can confirm that the graphics do look slicker. There’s more detail to characters, edges are smoother with less obvious stepping, and textures look more lifelike. We also noticed quicker load times and slightly smoother frame rates.

Although the number of games enhanced specifically for the iPad 2’s graphics is small at the moment, that will undoubtedly change over time. The experience could also be enhanced by use of the iPad 2’s new three-axis gyroscope, which allows the device to sense movement more accurately, and in three dimensions rather than two.
 
Battery life

The iPad 2 managed to last an impressive 16hrs 49mins in our test.
The original iPad didn’t really need improvement in terms of use on the move, but in view of the iPad 2’s far slimmer profile, we were dubious of Apple’s claims of ten-hour battery life.

Amazingly, the iPad 2’s stamina easily surpasses that of its predecessor. In order to test it, we set the screen to about 30% brightness (still bright enough to view  comfortably in most situations), downloaded a series of standard-definition video podcasts, and played them continuously until the battery ran out of juice. The first iPad lasted 13hrs 44mins in this test; the iPad 2 managed an even more impressive 16hrs 49mins (using the non-3G model).

This is way out in front of the rest of the tablet pack. For comparison, the ViewSonic ViewPad 10S (see p44), one of the better Android tablets, managed only 8hrs 34mins doing nothing but displaying the Android desktop.
 
The cameras

The rear camera can shoot still images at 960 x 720, and videos at 1,280 x 720.

The last major addition to the iPad 2 is not one, but two cameras: one at the front and one at the back. The one on the front is standard enough – with a 640 x 480 resolution it’s no great shakes, but it’s serviceable for video calling using applications such as Skype, and Apple’s proprietary FaceTime application.

The 960 x 720 stills/1280 x 720 video camera on the rear, however, is a disappointment. It’s certainly responsive, allowing you to shoot image after image with barely a pause between each, but the results are noisy and can’t hold a candle to those produced by the iPhone 4’s fantastic 5-megapixel camera.
 
Even in good light, photos look heavily grained, and in low light that’s compounded by chroma noise, with fine detail lost in a morass of red, green and blue pixels. Video capture isn’t much better: although recorded at 720p resolution, iPad 2 footage looks decidedly low-definition next to the crisp quality produced by the iPhone 4.

It’s also annoying that the shutter button lies right in the centre of the screen, making it a big stretch to click while holding the iPad two-handed. For a company that prides itself on attention to detail, this is a surprising slip.

It’s a shame, since the iPad could make a cracking imaging device. Its 9.7in screen makes a great viewfinder, and because you have a wide grip on the device, shooting steady video is far easier than with the one-handed grip of most phones and camcorders. With the addition of iMovie to the App Store, it’s a wonderfully convenient capture and editing device. In light of its image quality, though, we can’t recommend you upgrade to an iPad 2 just for the camera. We’d have preferred Apple to leave off the cameras altogether, rather than leaving us to make do with this half-hearted effort.
 
Conclusion and pricing

Right now, there’s nothing to touch the iPad 2. Even if a plausible alternative does emerge, it will be tough to compete with Apple’s library of more than 65,000 iPad-specific apps.

For now, in terms of design, battery life and app support, the iPad 2 is in a league of its own. Even the price is sensible, undercutting the original iPad’s launch price. A Wi-Fi-only 16GB iPad 2 will cost a reasonable $579, increasing for the larger capacities and 3G versions.

You may not like the way Apple does business – its 30% cut on app-generated revenue has been branded anti-competitive by some – and the way it locks you into the dreadful iTunes is hardly enticing. There’s still no USB or SD card slot, and still no support for Flash.

Overall, though, the iPad 2 experience is overwhelmingly positive. We wish the cameras were better, and that Apple would open up its closed system just a bit; but in all it’s a resounding success in a market where Apple’s every competitor has so far fallen short of greatness. If you’re in the market for a tablet, you’d be mad not to put the iPad 2 at the top of your list.

Accessories and software

The new version of iMovie is available only on the iPad 2 and lets users make precise edits. At $4.99 it's a bargain.

An ingenious addition to the iPad 2 is its magnetic left edge, which allows the new Smart Cover to snap into place. Costing $45 (or $79 for a leather version), it’s split into four segments, with a hinged spine. It can snap neatly onto the iPad 2 or fold back for use as a stand. When it’s placed across the surface of the iPad 2, the screen turns off automatically. It flops around disconcertingly when folded back, though: we preferred to remove it when using the iPad 2 handheld.
The iPad 2 comes installed with iOS 4.3 (also available to original iPad owners), which brings a new, faster JavaScript engine for Safari mobile, dubbed Nitro. There’s extended AirPlay support, plus the option to lock screen rotation, although the iPhone 4’s Personal Hotspot feature doesn’t make it. 
 
The PhotoBooth snapshot application also comes preinstalled. Similar to the Mac version, this allows you to apply all sorts of funky effects to your photos. The live preview, which displays nine effects in a grid, is fun to watch – but ultimately, it’s a bit of a gimmick.

There are two major new iPad apps in the App Store too. There’s now a version of iMovie for the iPad 2, although not for the original model. It makes editing onboard video incredibly easy, with new themes and improvements to audio editing. The large screen helps to make precise edits. At $4.99, it’s a bargain.

At the same price, GarageBand (available on both iPads) is even more impressive, with a huge array of instruments – including drums, keyboard, guitars and fun effects – to play with, and also what Apple calls “Smart Instruments” to help non-musical types hit all the right notes.

 

 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  ipad  |  ipad2  |  fingers  |  tablet  |  review  |  phones  |  mobilecomputing
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday 

Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday

 
Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN 

Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN

 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 officially unveiled - yes, it makes phone calls too 

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 officially unveiled - yes, it makes phone calls too

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
First look at Bungie's Destiny is awe-inspiring 

First look at Bungie's Destiny is awe-inspiring

 
Comments: 13
turbodewd
20 July 2011
I have an Ipad2 and I am not thrilled that the screen is only 1024x768. I also find the device a little heavy, I would like to see how light Samsung offerings are in comparison (I dont plastic at all).

Still, good device, very easy to use. Was very easy to use WiFi off my home adsl using an ASUS Black Diamond router.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
The Apple iPad 2 reviewed: why it's our A-List tablet?
Our review of the iPad 2 shows it is thinner, lighter and more powerful than the first iPad, with better battery life to boot - but the cameras are a letdown

What do you think? Join the discussion.
amcmo
21 July 2011
Apple USED to be lightest by varying amounts from all the other brands, though I believe the new Samsung may be lighter by a few grams. Can't comment on the build as I've not seen one.

Mentioned in another post I took a company iPad2 to London recently. Found it a doddle to carry and work with. I did have a Win notebook with me this trip which was most of the weight in the pack, so never noticed the iPad. It certainly was never an issue weight wise working on the knee or lap for late night connections through to the Oz office. The notebook will be left behind next trip.

Dont get the issue with the screen res... For me I saw all I needed when working remote. scrolling was not an issue. Biggest issue was dodgy WiFi at a couple of hotels.

The rumoured double res screen (iPad2 HD/iPad3 depending on which rumour)would be great for video's etc, though don't see any real benefit for everyday work (other than 'my dick is bigger than yours' type ego rubbish)
welshdog
9 October 2011
Anyone considering an iPad should make sure they check out the new Lenovo ThinkPad Tablets first. The comparisons I've seen *all* lean heavily towards the Lenovo for both pleasure *and* business!

I bought the 32Gb 3G+ version for the wife a few days ago and it's blown me out of the water. Just the stylus was a revelation. To be able to write properly without relying on a clunky virtual keyboard was alone almost sufficient for me to order one for myself! :)
rucharter
26 October 2011
I think Ipad it's expensive for the result you can get, I think it's better another kind of tablet
amcmo
26 October 2011
I've posted elsewhere, however bears repeating.

Our in house compo of iPad, Xoom, Lenovo had all but one person pick the iPad, and only one of those was an Apple fan.
hateipad
18 November 2011
whats the point of wasting money on ipad 2 its suxs and its so slow opening up apps when you have closed down other apps . DONT BE FOOLED BY APPLE , go for samsung or blackberry . STEVE U ARE A STUPID PERSON WHO CANT DESIGN YOUR OWN design for the frame work of your ipad2 u have to ask samsung to do it for you. U ARe a fool . i just hope apple will go bankrupt soon :)> BUNCH OF LOSSERS
photohounds
18 November 2011
The LAST thing we want is for Apple to go bankrupt. Competition is healthy and makes EVERYONE deliver better products. They have to COMPETE for our vote (dollar) and it makes them all try harder.

I see that Samsung has released a slightly different looking tablet to get around the German look-alike ban. Appleoids tell us that the black, glass rectangle with icons is NOT part of the strupid case, but if you sign an NDA you will find out that it is a MAJOR part of the complaint.

Android is MOVING ON AND UP judging by the accounts of others ... (haven't even seen one myself)

Android 4 looks set to leave all this BS behind (and apple too, if they don't start concentrating on making good products again, instead of pursuing petulant whines when others overtake them). The old we-copied-you-and improved, you-can't-do-the-same-back-at-us joke.

Time to get a life, cupertino and move on to better things.







Edited by photohounds: 18/11/2011 01:20:24 PM
amcmo
18 November 2011
HateiPad,

I'm guessing you've never actually used an iPad, judging by that unmitigated piece of tripe..

BTW, the Blackberry is SOOO SLOW, and almost dead!

I took our company iPad on the recent overseas trip. (after just about having to kill the guy who looks after it to prise it from his grasp). $10-15 local data SIM's in each country had me connected to the office at speed. (hotel WiFi was universally like treacle.)

It did everything that a normal notebook would do away from the office.

Slow is something it is MOST DEFINITELY NOT!

Now if you compare it to an i7 opening Notepad, yes possibly slower, but compared to that same i7 opening Outlook, the iPad Mail app positively flies!

Photo. yeh, yeh, same old tripe.

Actually we agree on one point,(genuine) competition is healthy!

Good to see Android/Samsung have got past the need to copy and are now trying to innovate.

As Apple have always innovated and usually lead, we'll see what their response is. Onwards and Upwards.
photohounds
22 November 2011
Yeah, yeah, and apple copied other's ideas for tablets and added a closed shop, but good store and the latest (screen/cpu/battery tech, NONE of which they made or created the ability to make.
Same old fan boy tripe to continue to insinuate that is 'innovation'.

There are plenty of options appearing. Can't deny apple stole a march on them all. Bro in law has a 'pad. He reckons they are the best readers on the market. Pity he's so brainwashed ... won't even look at a kindle (or any alternative). I will BRING mine around when it arrives so he can SEE the difference for himself.

I kinda like the electronic etch-a-sketch quip about them, bugger all power use unless you are changing the image is EXACTLY what's required and gives light weight AND battery life that the "glow in the dark 'readers'" can only have wet dreams of for the next decade or two.

Anyway, the point? Easy: THAT'S fanboyism at work - and he's a smart bloke. They seem to heed "Steve told me this is all I need". I wouldn't take it from that piece of work, nor from any ()*&*&^ android maker either. Until I'm 90+ I can make up my OWN *&^()* mind!

Recent Android tablets are supposed to be very snappy, too.
Outlook is foisted on those who allow it to be so, and those who have no choice.
My mail reader literally flies by comparison - with many more features that I want.

Always best to actually try gear a bit before hating it.
If you drop it on your toe, then hate it by all means.
:-)
rubaiyat
22 November 2011
hateipad wrote:
whats the point of wasting money on ipad 2 its suxs and its so slow opening up apps when you have closed down other apps . DONT BE FOOLED BY APPLE , go for samsung or blackberry . STEVE U ARE A STUPID PERSON WHO CANT DESIGN YOUR OWN design for the frame work of your ipad2 u have to ask samsung to do it for you. U ARe a fool . i just hope apple will go bankrupt soon :)> BUNCH OF LOSSERS


Nice one hateipad!

Great spoof of an Apple Hater. :)

Right down to the can't spell, dumb as grammar and accusations of stupidity coming from a moron.
Rallygreg
23 November 2011
hateipad, it is obvious that you are the stupid person and not Steve Jobs - you wrote rubbish.

I've had an iPad and I no longer use it, not because it was bad, not because it was poorly designed and not because the design was stolen (none of which is true), I stopped using it because it didn't suit my needs - I use Kindle for reading books, desktop/notebbok computers for my main work and a mobile phone.

I'm simply gobsmacked by the vitriol that "i" haters and Apple fanboys can generate. Where is the middle ground, there are plenty of great products from both sides of the fence.

P.S. seeing it's your first post you might be lucky to get to post again.

Edited by rallygreg: 23/11/2011 09:45:42 PM
photohounds
27 November 2011
I lean that way too RG,

a Kindle to read without eye strain
a phone with a good sized screen
a PC for all the serious stuff

Pretty well does it all - and properly.
Nifty toys have a habit of being left unused - though tablets are OK if you have to travel or like me might consider one as a photo viewer as I don't want a camera with a 7" screen thanks! It would only need to have to have industry-standard external inputs and a good+ screen.

There have been some interesting articles about the damage done to your health by being permanently remotely connected and 'on the job'.


I agree with Ruby, hateipad HAS to be a spoof. Doesn't even know he's talking to a ghost.




Edited by photohounds: 27/11/2011 04:18:12 PM
shmartinn
8 January 2012
Anyone because an iPad should accomplish abiding they analysis out the new Lenovo ThinkPad Tablets first. The comparisons I've apparent *all* angular heavily appear the Lenovo for both amusement *and* business!
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1765

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads