Intel's Core i7-980X Gulftown is a record breaking CPU, but at a steep price

Intel's Core i7-980X Gulftown is a record breaking CPU, but at a steep price
Rating
Overall:

32nm technology hits the high end for record-breaking performance – but at a wallet-breaking price

Performance:
6
Features & Design:
6
Value for money:
1
Price
Price: $1500
> Pricing info

Intel's Core i3 and i5 desktop chips have already demonstrated the clear benefits of the company's new 32nm process. Now the Core i7-980X (codenamed Gulftown) brings that die-shrink to the top-end LGA 1366 platform. The result is a chip so powerful that, reportedly, Intel originally intended to call it Core i9.

With a stock clock frequency of 3.33GHz, the i7-980X matches the 45nm Core i7-975, hitherto the fastest model in the family.

And where previous i7s have been quad-core parts, the new chip incorporates six physical cores. Thanks to Hyper-Threading, that means a single CPU can service 12 processes at once. Shared L3 cache has also grown proportionately to 12MB.

What's more, Gulftown is far less conservative than existing LGA 1366 processors when it comes to Turbo Boost, aggressively clocking individual cores up to 3.6GHz at the drop of a hat, then slashing them down to 1.6GHz when idle. On our test system, based on an Asus P6T Deluxe motherboard, that kept total idle power draw down to a bearable 108W.

It's a trick learnt from Intel's 32nm Westmere platform, and Westmere's new hardware AES encryption and decryption instructions are here too. The integrated graphics haven't been brought across, though, so the LGA 1366 platform still requires a discrete video card.

Need for speed

The real focus of Intel's i7-980X chip is on performance, and in our desktop benchmarks it achieved a creditable 2.23, a nose ahead of the i7-975, which scored 2.19.

Not surprisingly, it fared particularly well in the multitasking test, with a stellar score of 2.75. Even this doesn't reflect the full power of Gulftown: with so many cores on hand, that result was achieved using less than 30% of available processing capacity.

A better indicator of the true potential of the i7-980X is our 3ds Max test, since this application is specifically optimised for multicore processing and able to execute 12 threads at once.

Here, the system achieved a time of 1min 43secs to render our complex 3D scene, representing a score of 3.04 against our reference PC. With all six cores taxed at once, power draw for the whole system hit 217W, versus a peak of 173W in our multi-applications test.

Since the i7-980X is a multiplier-unlocked Extreme Edition, performance can be pushed yet higher by increasing the chip's range of available operating frequencies in the BIOS, and the 32nm design gives plenty of headroom to do so.

With a stock cooler, we were able to raise the maximum Turbo Boost speed to 4.14GHz, yielding a magnificent overall benchmark score of 2.59 (including a rather impressive 3.15 for multitasking). Once again, Intel has broken its own record to produce the fastest CPU we've seen to date.

The cost

Such prestige inevitably comes at a price, and in the US, Intel anticipates selling these chips in bulk for $999 each. As an end user in Australia, you're looking at nearly $1500. That's a steep premium when you look at what cheaper processors can achieve.

A 3.4GHz AMD Phenom II, for example, delivers five-sixths of the desktop performance for around one-sixth of the price.

Indeed, for everyday use a six-core processor makes little sense at any price: despite the onward march of hardware, most modern desktop applications simply can't make use of this many threads.

That, along with the cost, destines Gulftown for a specialist workstation role, rather than a general-purpose desktop one.

But while the i7-980X isn't a realistic purchase for most of us, it's still a striking demonstration of processor potential - and a salutary hint at the sort of power that can be expected to trickle down into the mainstream over the next few years.

 

This Review appeared in the June, 2010 issue of PC & Tech Authority Magazine

See more about:  intel  |  core  |  i7980x  |  cpu  |  32nm  |  i5  |  i3
 
 
Comments: 4
911TS
26 June 2010
Its now end of June and no further 32Nm 6 core chips from Intel, yet they announce a 990X chip.
No doubt this will also be unaffordable.
Their strategy of not releasing any mainstream 6 core 32Nm Core i7 chips at a reasonable price is bizarre.
It has left a gaping hole in the market for AMD to fill.
I want to build a 6 core PC and AMD's Phenom II is the only choice. Both Phenom II's are a bargain at $240 and $360 and make Intel's marketing strategy look daft.



Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Intel's Core i7-980X Gulftown is a record breaking CPU, but at a steep price?
32nm technology hits the high end for record-breaking performance – but at a wallet-breaking price

What do you think? Join the discussion.
jason77
21 February 2011
That seems to be the case at the mo 911TS & AMD is filling that hole nicely.I give AMD a high 5 for pricing on all cores :) I feel intels marketing strategy works more in the lines of mass output then trying to be competitive in the price market. In saying that, there is a lot of people who couldint care what CPU is in there pc when buying & that is where most of the market sits. Im sure for the mean time the 990x will be sitting at the high end of pcs.
Slatts
21 February 2011
I too lay claim to being an AMD tragic.

It's your other hobby I find disturbing jason.

What's with this compulsion to dig up dead and buried threads?:(

jason77
22 February 2011
u got me on that one slatts. Its a hobby I have to let go of I guess :)
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

What PC component are you planning to upgrade in the next six months










Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads