Rating
Related Articles
Editor's Pick
Latest Reviews
We’ve taken a look at both the HF10 and HF100 from Canon this month, although they differ only in their storage options, price and colour. The HF10 includes 16GB of internal flash for storage, but shares its optics, sensor, exterior design and menu system with the HF100.
Both models have tried-and-tested camcorder styling: an adjustable hand strap allows the thumb and forefinger to work the controls, and a rotating fold-out 2.7in LCD screen lets you see exactly what you’re shooting from a range of angles.
Despite the standard camcorder layout, however, the HF10 feels more comfortable to use than the other similarly styled models on test, even though it’s far from the smallest around.
The body is molded to fit the hand, and while some of the smaller cameras this month fail to fill the palm comfortably, the HF10’s recording button and tactile zoom control fall naturally under the thumb and index finger.
A mode dial can also be easily spun with the thumb, switching between video, photograph and their respective playback modes. Only the Power button is slightly out of reach, although this does help you avoid pressing it by accident.
The standard of video output from the HF10 is as good as the quality of its design, helped in part by the sizeable 1/3.2in CCD sensor. This is larger than those found in cheaper camcorders, such as the compact 1/6in component used in the JVC, and helps the HF10 produce brighter clips, even in bad light.
However, there is still some grain present in these darker clips, and colours are reproduced slightly better by the (even larger) 1/2.7in chip found in the Canon HG10. Using a light in these conditions drastically improves the quality of footage, but the HF10 nonetheless handles a wide range of environments admirably.
Despite the excellent quality, convenient 16GB internal flash storage and comfortable ergonomics, the HF10 can’t quite match our best camcorder on test this month. The Panasonic HDC-HS9 has more features, better image quality and is worth the $34 price difference.