Performance:
Features & Design:
Value for money:
Overall Rating:
User Rating: No user ratings.
RRP: $
208 (time of review)
Check the latest prices.
Redefines the mainstream graphics market,
offering high-end power at a mid-range price
The 9600 GT redefines the mainstream graphics market, offering high-end power at a mid-range price. At this price we want one.
Nvidia has been under rare pressure recently, with ATi’s launch of the Radeon HD 3800-series finally giving it a route back into the PCs of mainstream gamers.
The cards were eminently affordable, yet fast enough to run the latest games – a boast that Nvidia’s mid-range GeForce 8600 cards couldn’t match. But ATi’s success was always going to spur Nvidia into action, and its riposte is suitably hard-hitting: the next-generation Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT.
It’s a longer card than the old 8600 GT, looking more like an 8800 GT. Like the 8800 series the GPU is a 65nm part, with 64 stream processors – twice that of the 8600’s – and it also boasts 512MB of 900MHz GDDR3 memory.
It’s the first mainstream Nvidia card to boast a 256-bit memory bus, and with a core clock of 650MHz, it’s actually very similar overall to the 8800 GTS 512MB – perhaps it’s not so next-gen after all.
We were eager to see whether the 9600 GT would be fast enough to wipe out ATi’s recent gains in one fell swoop, so we slotted it into our test rig – an X48-chipset motherboard, with a 3GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9650 processor and 4GB of DDR3 RAM – and put it through our demanding set of 3D benchmarks.
Crysis is the game of the moment, and the 9600 GT coasted through the first test: it achieved an average of 50fps at 1280 x 1024 and Medium settings, which puts it ahead of the 8800 GS, was almost on a par with the 8800 GT, and it nearly doubled the framerate achieved by the 8600 GTS.
Bumping the resolution up to 1600 x 1200 still produced a playable 38fps, and only when we also lifted the quality settings to High did it drop to a shaky 21fps.
In the slightly less demanding Call of Duty 4 it performed just as impressively. At 1600 x 1200 with the quality settings at their highest, it managed 50fps in our benchmark; again, that’s more than double that of the 8600 GTS, and around 25% faster than an ATi Radeon HD 3870.
It’s a huge increase in performance over the old 8600 cards, and massively repositions Nvidia’s mid-range. What once was only achievable by the upper-mid-range cards – the 8800 GT, for example, which currently retails at around $240 – is now within reach of the affordable mainstream, even if it’s not the huge architectural leap forward we might have hoped for.
Initial pricing for Gigabyte’s 9600 GT puts it at $208. This would put it below the $290 typical price of the HD 3870, and $30 below the 8800 GT, making it an absolute steal.
It’s a bold move by Nvidia, one which will surely kill off several of its existing 8-series cards in one fell swoop. But it will also put a dent in ATi’s recent resurgence, and right now that’s exactly what Nvidia needs.
This article appeared in the May, 2008 issue of PC Authority.
Post your review online now and win 1 of 3 Lenovo laptops!
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment and win!
Comments: 5
|
steve_666
May 9, 2008 1:57 PM
|
quick question: when buying a videocard does the brand really matter? i had a quick look for the 9600 GT and found these brands: Galaxy, MSI, Gigabyte, Inno3D, Leadtek, eVGA, XpertVision which is better?
Comment made about the PC Authority article: Gigabyte Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT, is new ultimate mid-range card? The 9600 GT redefines the mainstream graphics market, offering high-end power at a mid-range price. At this price we want one.
What do you think? Join the discussion. |
|
geller
May 9, 2008 3:18 PM
|
Rarely. Check out most magazine comparisons, the benchmarks are all in the same ballpark if it's the same GPU. What's important is:
- GPU type (ATI/Nvidia, model #) - accessories/cooling - bundled software in pack (sometimes there are great game promotions)
Gigabyte, Leadtek, MSI have good reps. |
|
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
May 9, 2008 7:30 PM
|
I'd go for the cheapest, or for great value, the Palit branded 9600GT. |
|
Josh Collins
May 12, 2008 11:46 AM
|
Steve, geller hit the majority of it on the head.
That is, if the product follows the reference design than the products will be much the muchness. What will then distinguish the good value from the wallet destroyers are changes such as increase clock speeds (pre-overclocked), bundled software (games, DVD player apps, cables etc), warranty period and coverage, cooling solution and if the brand has really gone our on a limb, then the product may sport a non-reference PCB and/or higher quantity of memory.
The changes can be positive, negative or just simply useless. For example, putting 1024MB of memory on a card with a 256-bit memory bus is just useless - proven in the Gainward 9600GT 1024MB review in issue #89 of Atomic.
When it comes to brand preference, there are certain brands that command respect above others. Some such brands include XFX, EVGA, Sapphire, Powercolor, ASUS and GIGABYTE. There are other brands such as Gainward/Palit (same parent company) and GeCube that come up with good value redesigns.
In regards to the 9600GT my personal preference would be to either go with a 1st tier NVIDIA partner (XFX or EVGA) or one of the big 2nd tier vendors (ASUS or GIGABYTE would be my preference for this category). Look for a bundle that offers good value in terms of performance to the dollar and any bundled software.
If you're looking for a well performing 9600GT solution, I'd suggest checking out the GIGABYTE GV-NV96T512HP as it sports higher than reference frequencies (e.g. 720MHz core rather than the reference 650MHz), is constructed on a custom PCB (often cheaper) and uses a passive cooling solution while not inducing heat related issues so common to such heatsinks. For more info, check out the review on page #49 or issue #89 of Atomic - should be on sale at news agencies this Wednesday.
Note: a 2nd tier company does not mean they are of lesser quality. What it means that they do not specialise in a single corporations GPU solution and will also often redesign the PCB etc.
So, for example XFX and EVGA are 1st tier partners for NVIDIA and therefore only produce NVIDIA based products and do not redesign PCBs etc, therefore only producing reference design solutions. The 1st tier partners get the products first from NVIDIA and therefore are generally the first in the channel with products available for sale.
On the other side there are 2nd tier companies. This group still produce high quality products but often also produce the competing GPU, in this instance ATI based product, and/or redesign the PCBs for custom solutions of a given GPU.
|
|
steve_666
May 12, 2008 2:36 PM
|
thanks guys great advice. I thought as much when it comes down to it. The main reason i asked is because everyone reviews Asus, Gigayte and MSI i just wanted to know more about the cheaper brand names, I go for an OEM version. I guess its just like home brand stuff, its still made by the big guys just labelled different. |