Saturday March 20, 2010 4:41 PM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Virus threat not limited to AMD platforms
Virus threat not limited to AMD platforms
NEWS

Virus threat not limited to AMD platforms

by Andrew Charlesworth  on Sep 5, 2006

Windows, not chips, the target of Bounds virus.

AMD has been quick to deny press reports that its processors are exclusively targeted by a proof-of-concept virus identified last week in a blog posting by security firm Symantec. 

"The virus in question takes advantage of a vulnerability in Windows x86-64, and not anything specific in our processor," said Richard Baker, European channel marketing manager at AMD.

Peter Ferrie, senior security response engineer at Symantec, author of the original alert, has now updated his blog.

"I have posted this blog ... to outline a recent Q&A session that provides more information about my previous blog regarding a new virus affecting the AMD64 platform," he wrote. 

Discovered by Symantec in an online forum for virus writers, the two items of malware, dubbed w32.bounds and w64.bounds, infect systems by tying themselves to Windows executable files.

They have the ability to execute chip-level assembly code, but are not classified as so-called chip-level threats.

They affect all Windows x86-64 architectures, which includes Intel and AMD chips, but not Intel's Itanium IA64. 

"The virus exploits no flaws in the CPUs," wrote Ferrie in his updated blog.

"It is using a designed-in feature of the operating system in a slightly unusual way; however, it completely conforms to the specification.

"In addition, it should be noted that w64.bounds is specific only to the AMD64 style of CPU (which includes the Intel EM64T), as opposed to Intel's Itanium, on which it won't run."

Although potentially dangerous, the malware has not been used to create a widely distributed virus, nor could it, according to Symantec. The virus writers are simply demonstrating their technical prowess.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk
APRIL PC AUTHORITY - ON SALE NOW
In our AMD vs Intel CPU megatest we rate 50 of the best on the market - from budget to performance.
15 Internet Security Software packages get a going over in our 'torture test'.
Plus, we look at what works and what fails in MS Office 2010 and tell you how to try it - for free.
Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

Not in Australia, the innovative technologies you won't find here: paying with RFID
Paying for our goods with RFID technology might seem risky, but in some countries it's already commonplace. Can RFID payments be more than just an e-toll solution in Australia?
 
Vintage Tech: Looking back at 3DFX Voodoo
3DFX's technology was groundbreaking for its time, but the company is little but an Nvidia afterthought these days. What gave the Voodoo its special magic?
 
That pesky "water damage" phone issue: getting repairs could be tricky
Readers were telling us that repairers were claiming "water damage" as a reason for refusing to repair their phones. So what are your rights in this situation?
 


 
1) Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB36 plans 25%
2) Nokia E7147 plans 4%
3) Nokia E7228 plans 7%
4) Nokia N9740 plans 8%
5) HTC Magic5 plans 4%
1) Netspace36 plans 1%
2) 37 plans 7%
3) Telstra BigPond30 plans 2%
4) iiNet32 plans 1%
5) Optus41 plans 3%

Mobiles | Broadband | Credit Cards

Haymarket - PC Authority