Battlefield 3 Premium enlists an army, and the Premium model will spread further

Battlefield 3 Premium enlists an army, and the Premium model will spread further

EA Labels boss intends on transitioning the ‘Premium’ model beyond Battlefield 3 after the success of Premium.

I’ve got no qualms paying for a service that I can wrap my head around. When I first looked at what Call of Duty Elite was offering, I didn’t really see the value. But when I was recently challenged on why I was so willing to crack out my credit card to purchase additional content for Battlefield 3, I found the logic a lot simpler.

I can’t speak on behalf of all PC gamers, but I’ve hit a point where I’ve accepted the reality that we’ll be paying for DLC that, in the past, was supplementary. In light of this confession, I have no problems paying for DLC that has no problems justifying its price tag—and, yes, I include Battlefield 3 Premium as an example of this. I’ve sunk dozens of hours into Battlefield 3 – Close Quarters, and the best news is that my $49.99 purchase still has a couple more substantial hits of content value to melee off any chance of buyer’s remorse.

And it seems that at least 800,000 other gamers are of a similar mindset as, according to USA Today, EA Games chief Patrick Soderlund announced that more than 800,000 Battlefield 3 owners have coughed up the cash for Premium. That’s at least $40-million in digital revenue; a number that’s no small amount, as EA Labels boss Frank Gibeau realised.

Speaking with GamesIndustry, Gibeau confirmed what many of us already suspected: that EA is looking at extending the ‘Premium’ philosophy to other games. He also managed to confirm this in the same sentence that he took a shot at Call of Duty. Check it out. “We actually think our Premium service exceeds what [Call of Duty] Elite does–from a value standpoint, from a content standpoint, and longer term we think that we can bring more properties into that offering and that’ll be great for the business.”

Returning to my initial ranty paragraph, I have no problem with long-term worthwhile Premium models being applied to other EA franchises, as long as the value is immediately evident in the offering. There’s a big difference between releasing content post-launch that feels like it was deliberately withheld from the retail release to justify down-the-track purchases, and supporting your title months after launch with meaningful (and, let’s be honest, multiplayer-focused) stuff.

Where do you stand on EA’s Premium philosophy?

See more about:  battlefield  |  premium  |  ea  |  patrick  |  soderlund  |  frank  |  gibeau
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

AMD Debuts Its Official HD 7990 

AMD Debuts Its Official HD 7990

 
Electronic Arts CEO Resigns as Criticism Reaches Critical Mass 

Electronic Arts CEO Resigns as Criticism Reaches Critical Mass

 
Nvidia Allegedly Set to Launch ‘GeForce Titan’ GK-110 Based Supercard 

Nvidia Allegedly Set to Launch ‘GeForce Titan’ GK-110 Based Supercard

 
GTX 700 vs HD 8000 – The Future of Graphics Cards in 2013 

GTX 700 vs HD 8000 – The Future of Graphics Cards in 2013

 
'Blood and Chrome' - The Battlestar Galactica Prequel That Could (Have Been a Full Series) 

'Blood and Chrome' - The Battlestar Galactica Prequel That Could (Have Been a Full Series)

 

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  25%
 
The PlayStation 4
  29%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  46%
TOTAL VOTES: 131

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads