Top 5 iPhone 5 concept images

Top 5 iPhone 5 concept images

Despite all the gossip, the iPhone 5's still a mystery. We hope it's drawn inspiration from at least one of these brilliant concepts

 

 

5 of the best iPhone 5 concepts – by Vchenjingyuangel

It doesn't get more high concept than this. We heard the iPhone 6 might be getting a curved display, but this is just downright insane.


Perhaps years ahead of its time, Flickr user Vchenjingyuangel's flexible iPhone concept simply serves to remind us that while a razor thin phone with a bendy screen would undoubtedly be very cool, it would also be quite impractical.

Where does the battery go? What about a headphone socket? So many questions.

 

5 of the best iPhone 5 concepts – by Handyflash


It's probably safe to say that the iPhone 5 isn't going to be as thin as a Jacob's cracker – at least not until wafer thin batteries become mass produced. But a pancake-thin iPhone like Handyflash's concept would sure make for great eye candy.

Of course, gripping the sides to actually make a phone call would take extreme dexterity, but slipping it into your skinny jeans would be effortless.

5 of the best iPhone 5 concepts – by Ciccarese Design


Drawing on some obvious design cues from Apple's king of slim, the MacBook Air, this iPhone 5 concept by Ciccarese Design throws up a tapered form-factor we're not familiar with – but most certainly aren't against.

The iPhone's home button is still intact, but its upgraded edge-to-edge screen almost spills over the sides. How's that for eye candy? Unsurprisingly, its top-heavy design has earned it the nickname 'iPhone Air'.

5 of the best iPhone 5 concepts – by Antonello Falcone


Antonello Falcone's iPhone 5 concept has gone for edge-to-edge screen dominance, with a 4.6in display complete with curved glass edges. Its form factor is a tad longer than we're used to, but it's supermodel slim at just 8.4mm. It's also traded in the iPhone's traditional home button for a touch sensitive offering.

On the right, you're staring at a dashboard widget that works with the Notification Centre.

A bezel-free phone is probably a long shot – but hey, we can still dream, can't we?

5 of the best iPhone 5 concepts – by Michal Bonikowski


Unlike the majority of badger-licking-insane iPhone 5 concepts out there, Michal Bonikowski's design remains largely loyal to the established-loved iPhone aesthetic. It makes his sleek, drool-inducing take on the impending iPhone 5 pretty darned plausible.

Taking a design cue from the iPad 2, its curved behind isn't so far-fetched an idea considering the iPhone 5's cosmetic features are rumoured to include an iPad 2-style brushed aluminium backside.

You'll also notice that Bonikowski has disposed of the mechanical home button, too, in favour of a touch-sensitive option. How close this concept will be to the real thing is something we'll have to find out come winter.

Source: Copyright © Stuff.tv

See more about:  apple  |  iphone  |  phones
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Wozniak calls for an open, programmable iOS 

Wozniak calls for an open, programmable iOS

 
Sony World Photography Awards 2012: Nature, Wildlife and the Environment 

Sony World Photography Awards 2012: Nature, Wildlife and the Environment

 
Opinion: the Samsung Galaxy S3 is what the iPhone 4S should have been 

Opinion: the Samsung Galaxy S3 is what the iPhone 4S should have been

 
Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III 

Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III

 
Samsung Galaxy S3: full specifications list 

Samsung Galaxy S3: full specifications list

 
Comments: 12
photohounds
9 February 2012
Curved screens - already actually being shown beyond the drawing board stage elsewhere.

Will you be able to use 'phones' like these for break & enters as well?


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Top 5 iPhone 5 concept images?
Despite all the gossip, the iPhone 5's still a mystery. We hope it's drawn inspiration from at least one of these brilliant concepts

What do you think? Join the discussion.
amcmo
10 February 2012
Yeh, we know Photo....
photohounds
11 February 2012
Time for another retro-'invention' - maybe for the ip6 or ip7 [grin]
rubaiyat
11 February 2012
Yeh we know photo…
amcmo
11 February 2012
Photo,

Instead of having your usual dig at Apple over a series of artists concepts of a phone that may or may not be in production, and may or may not bear any relationship to any actual product, why not wait until Apple release their next phone, then attempt to base your usual biased anti-Apple rant on something that actually exists?

I am certain there will be ample opportunity at that time for you to re-write tech history and prove one of your favorites invented some aspect of the new phone before Apple ever existed.

Until then, so much hot air.
photohounds
13 February 2012
Yes we know, boys ... Re-write? Agree wholeheartedly!

Those retro-invention patents for a small tweak of something pre-existing ARE a pain and certainly represent little more than expensive hot legal air.

As for FRAND ...

Ruby, you have repeatedly and falsely accused me of attempting to get 'everything' (including music) for free and that's bad - right? RIGHT??? And we should all buy Apple even if it is overpriced?
So .... it is acceptable for Apple to try to weasel on royalties that enable its phone business? Instead it tries to pay what IT wants to pay (a pittance), for someone ELSE'S ingenuity.

See the difference?

I don't make billions off other people's hard work. I buy what I need and if I percieve a lack of value, I simply buy elsewhere - as do most people.

Double standards personified ...
amcmo
13 February 2012
Photo,

Apple have not weaseled as you put it.

They have consistently offered to pay FRAND royalites (Moto refused them).

Where there has been dispute, they've either defended if they felt in a strong position, or agreed to pay where they felt there might be substance.

Apple make billions off their own hard work (and their workers)

Just minor point, show me an Apple product that is overpriced, apart from possibly the Pro.

Everyone else seems to struggle to meet the same price points (or have to give product away to try get market share).
photohounds
13 February 2012
True, Apple gouge far less in the last 18 months. They used to.
I've said for ages that the stuff is good quality.

The fact remains that if you don't see the "apple light" and prefer an alternative, there's something "wrong". Apple offering to pay what suits them isn't the same as paying what something's WORTH.

Flimsy apple patents are being used in a (thankfully failing) attempt to EXCLUDE ALL competition and gain a monopoly share. Poor diddums, someone else is doing what apple do, this time with REAL patents and it's "just not fair"? Waaaaaah!


Unlike some, I'm just not religious about electronics. If Sam makes so-so models of whatever I'm interested in (HDDS for example) I'll go else where in a flash because I'm not the card carrying Sammy fan boy as you you allege. RIP Hitachi HDDs, by the way.

Sam's gear is good and value (no, not looking for "cheap" thanks). I don't want to pay more than a thing is worth because it possesses some mystical powers or has a well movie-exposed logo! I don't congregate with other Sammy users in a product love-fest like the religious fora of some brands.

Are there in fact, Sammy love-fest fora??? Other than this one :)

Just like we're told there's "something wrong" with Australians because we "cannot understand" a carbon tax. Many see it for what it mainly is - a wealth-redistributing mechanism. Practically - If we rewarded companies who prove to do the right thing with tax rebates - great. Too much paperwork? No problem, no rebate.

amcmo
14 February 2012
It's not a matter of people seeing or not seeing the Apple Light as you put it.

Choice is good, when based on one's own work (as opposed to slavish copy).

For a reasonable number of years, the supposed Apple Tax has been in naysayer's minds more than in fact.

When the alternative is increasingly being shown to be based on stolen idea's there is a problem.

More commentators are coming to the conclusion that the decision to 'go after Apple' (more than just in phones) was made while Google had a director at Apple If true that is about as low as you get.

As for paying what a patent is worth, there is a consensus, and 2.5% as demanded by Googarola is considered obscene and at a level that will kill competition. Apple offered a level in line with figures charged to other companies.

As for Apple's patent claims failing HTC have lost on one, and as Google have left that in ICS I'd see them copping one there unless they can bully Apple into handing it over as seems their strategy.
photohounds
15 February 2012
Apple built on the work or others - they ALL do.
The copy thing is a phurphy beyond what ALL companies do in the ordinary course of staying in business.

Theirs are often the best known examples of this or that (due to massive advertising blitz, (itoons is GREAT for peddling the idea that something is 'invented' or 'magical') not for having 'invented' a particular thing.

Time to get off that religious soap box, the itune is wearing a bit thin and has always been full of holes.
rubaiyat
15 February 2012
Total and utter twaddle.

Something that is immediately obvious to those who have had no previous experience of Macs or Apple products is just how different they are. The only con is that so many people were lied to for so long that they are only belatedly coming to try Apple's products and are only now realising what they are missing out on.

The more they experience it the more they want:

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/mobiles/iphone-halo-launches-apple-into-stratosphere-20120215-1t546.html

Even the last hold outs, Big Business is well and truly coming around, through absolutely no effort by Apple, because so many senior people in companies now use Apple products the old fear, uncertainty and doubt thrown up by their IT departments is being shown for what it is. White lipped fear at being sidelined.
photohounds
15 February 2012
iTune number 897762

Environmental record - the most humourous lyric in this particular iteration of the company song.

Publishing rule #1
NEVER upset advertisers, APPEASE them.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads