We want this small grey box

We want this small grey box

Intel is adding more fuel to the SSD fire with this SSD 520, which combines Sandforce's top end SATA 6Gbps controller with Intel's years of SSD expertise.

We've been writing about SSDs for as long as there's been buzz about them, which is a while now. But it looks like Intel's SSD 520 family of drives will ratchet up the lure of solid state another notch.

With capacities from 60GB to 480GB, the Intel drives use the Sandforce SF-2281controller, as do drives from Kingston and OCZ. The difference with the 520 is that it has been through Intel's notoriously torturous validation process, which has resulted in firmware changes that just aren't available to the competitors at the moment.

Intel is claiming transfer speeds of more than 500MB/sec for the 520 series, speeds which the mechanical drives in consumer PCs can't match. Though as we've explained in the past, even cheaper SSDs will outrun mechanical hard disks.

Better reliability is a good thing - you can find reports of some SSD users encountering BSODs, often with other models that use the same SF2281 controller as this. What hasn't changed is the price. Intel's press release puts the SSD 520 Series at (for orders of 1,000):

  • 60GB - $149
  • 120GB - $229
  • 180GB - $369
  • 240GB - $509
  • 480GB - $999

We're yet to see street pricing, but as you'd expect, you'll be paying premium for performance. At these prices, if you are waiting for SSDs to become mainstream on desktops, you might be waiting a while. 

 

Also read:

Precious boot speed: Solid State Drives explained

PC Building: State of the SSD

Need for Speed: 10 Solid-State Drives Reviewed

Silent running: An introduction to SSDs

 

 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  ssd  |  intel  |  sandforce  |  520  |  price
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Wozniak calls for an open, programmable iOS 

Wozniak calls for an open, programmable iOS

 
Is this the Samsung Galaxy S3? 

Is this the Samsung Galaxy S3?

 
Paleo-Tech: The HP 300LX Palmtop PC 

Paleo-Tech: The HP 300LX Palmtop PC

 
Expect "hundreds" of Thunderbolt devices, says Intel  

Expect "hundreds" of Thunderbolt devices, says Intel

 
The Android A-List: HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S II 

The Android A-List: HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S II

 
Comments: 4
amcmo
12 February 2012
While they look good on paper, I don't see anything in the spec to make them worth the additional cost over a Crucial or OWC drive.

Both the others use Sandforce. The latest Crucial (being part of Micron) likely use the same flash chips as the Intel. Can't confirm the Flash used in the latest OWC, however we're seeing performance on par with the best.

We sell OWC and Crucial and have access to Intel, though have yet to find a valid reason to pay the additional.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
We want this small grey box?
Intel is adding more fuel to the SSD fire with this SSD 520, which combines Sandforce's top end SATA 6Gbps controller with Intel's years of SSD expertise.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
PeteC
12 February 2012
I thought the M4 use Marvell controller, not Sandforce. ??
amcmo
12 February 2012
Will have to double check, notes on Crucial say Sandforce.

All my kit has OWC.
amcmo
12 February 2012
You are correct - Marvell on the Crucial.

Spec sheet doesn't mention, though I have a press release mentioning the Marvel.

Marvel make a good controller, though prefer Sandforce (as long as an OCZ drive)
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads