Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome

Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome

Extension to stop ad networks tracking browsers

A privacy expert at Stanford University has released a Do Not Track extension for Google's Chrome browser, which could help end-users avoid being followed by some behavioural advertising companies.

The Do Not Track header is a technology and policy programme designed to allow consumers to opt out of tracking used by targeted advertising networks, but until now there had been no way of adding the feature to Chrome.

“The Chrome extension I developed adds the Do Not Track header (DNT: 1) to HTTP requests,” privacy specialist Jonathan Mayer said. “All the other major browsers have had a Do Not Track option for quite some time - this extension allows Chrome users to finally take advantage of Do Not Track.”

Although Google does include privacy options that retain opt-out cookies when a user deletes general browsing cookies, it has come under fire from privacy advocates for not implementing Do Not Track, even though the technology remains in its early stages.

“Google has steadfastly refused to add the feature to Chrome,” Mayer said. “Google's position has been heavily criticised by advocates, academics, and policy makers - including the FTC.”

Mayer was able to complete the tool after Google released a non-experimental version of the Chrome WebRequest API, which allows extensions to do much more to protect user security and privacy.

The scheme still has its shortcomings, however, and one of the criticisms is that advertisers are not legally required to take any notice of the presence of a Do Not Track header, which means unscrupulous websites could ignore privacy requests.

“Do Not Track is a preference-signalling mechanism, so yes, websites have to add support for it," Mayer said, adding that additional tools could be used to keep tracking companies honest.

“There was some early criticism of Do Not Track for being unenforceable, but that line has largely faded, partly because researchers have demonstrated again and again how web measurement tools can catch bad actors.”

The blocker is available from the Chrome web store, but Mayer cautioned that the extension requires Chrome 17 or later. For anyone running the default Release build, the extension will not successfully install until late January 2012, he said.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Source: Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing

See more about:  privacy  |  security  |  chrome
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Faster, lighter, more juice: meet 20 new laptops with Intel's new chip 

Faster, lighter, more juice: meet 20 new laptops with Intel's new chip

 
New Apple Mac Pro is insanely powerful and looks insane too 

New Apple Mac Pro is insanely powerful and looks insane too

 
Samsung launches Galaxy Tab 3 

Samsung launches Galaxy Tab 3

 
Apple and Google petitioned to remove 'gay cure' app 

Apple and Google petitioned to remove 'gay cure' app

 
Making the switch: moving from an iPhone to a Galaxy S4 

Making the switch: moving from an iPhone to a Galaxy S4

 
Comments: 6
photohounds
16 January 2012
Good one ...


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome?
Extension to stop ad networks tracking browsers

What do you think? Join the discussion.
davsan
16 January 2012
Firefox already has an extension doing the same thing. It is called Ghostery. It blocks all trackers by choice. For example it has blocked 10 trackers on this site.
photohounds
17 January 2012
Thanks mate, ignorant of this until now, as I (and probably many others) thought 'private' browsing' would be enough. Anyway I've installed Ghostery :)

This tracking a type of CarrierIQ for browsers in a way ... and we know about all the noise THAT is making.

A bunch of Carriers installed it as did and ONE phone maker. Many have now hastily removed it to avoid the impending PR disaster. That phone maker seems to have easily brainwashed its fans into believing only bad old Android had it. Still some people will believe anything. Others are happy to be tracked by their browser.





Edited by photohounds: 17/1/2012 11:26:29 AM
amcmo
17 January 2012
just remember, this is a 'please don't track me', not a 'don't you dare track me'.

It's reliant upon them actually taking notice of your request.
elhombre
17 January 2012
Wouldn't a VPN be more effective?


amcmo wrote:
just remember, this is a 'please don't track me', not a 'don't you dare track me'.

It's reliant upon them actually taking notice of your request.
Eric
29 February 2012
Thanks for sharing good article
Comments have been disabled for this article.
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Microsoft sweetens upgrade deal on Windows 8 and Server 2012
20 Jun 2013
Microsoft is offering up to 15% off the latest versions of Windows, Server and Office for ...
Handy apps: a McAfee app that remembers all your passwords
14 Jun 2013
If you've got 10 passwords you have to remember for web sites, bank accounts, work systems and ...
Small business rallying cry continues before election
13 Jun 2013
Hate paperwork? Find taxes too complicated? Then the organisers of this nation-wide petition ...
Worried about your office being broken into? Here's 12 ways to protect your valuables
7 Jun 2013
My office was broken into not once, but twice. Here are 12 things we learned that you can use to ...
Mobotix MxActivitySensor reduces false alarms from your office IP surveillance cameras
6 Jun 2013
Security system offers a more reliable level of service while it also reduces bandwidth costs.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  17%
 
The PlayStation 4
  29%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  54%
TOTAL VOTES: 1360

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads