Federal Court overturns Samsung Galaxy Tab injunction

Federal Court overturns Samsung Galaxy Tab injunction

Appeal heads to High Court.

The Federal Court of Australia has unanimously overturned an interlocutory injunction against Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet, with Apple ordered to pay costs of the appeal.

But Justice Lindsay Foster, who handed down the judgment today on behalf of the Full Bench, granted Apple an extension on the judgment until 4pm Friday this week, by which time the iPad maker intends to apply for leave to appeal before the High Court.

The Full Bench ordered the initial injunction against the sale of the tablet to be "immediately discharged".

The successful appeal will allow Samsung to launch the Australian version of the tablet within seven days.

However, the stay granted by Justice Foster will prevent Samsung from officially launching the product before the High Court considers Apple's leave to appeal.

"Samsung Electronics Australia is pleased with today’s unanimous decision by the Federal Court to lift the preliminary injunction on sales of the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1," the company said in a statement. "We believe the ruling clearly affirms that Apple’s legal claims lack merit. "

Samsung is still likely to launch the device despite earlier claims that injunctions past mid-October would significantly reduce the tablet's commercial life.

As part of the judgment, Samsung will be required to take account of each Galaxy Tab 10.1 imported, kept, and sold, as well of associated material including applications sold by Samsung until further notice, in order to keep a track of potential damages owed to Apple before a final hearing.

An Apple spokeswoman refused to comment on the case.

Apple's lead barrister Stephen Burley SC sought to make a stay of orders until Monday, allowing Apple to speak with US headquarters and formulate an appeal to the High Court.

"As I understand it the High Court has no fixed procedure to deal with an urgent application such as this," Burley said. "By Friday we'd be in a position to make that application."

Samsung lead barrister Peter Chalk opposed the short stay of orders, claiming it would "simply prolong the injustice that has already been held against Samsung".

"Any stay no matter, how short, given the pendency of the Christmas trading period would continue to cause substantial injustice and hardship to Samsung," he said.

Justice Foster agreed to the extension until Friday, providing Apple some hope that the injunction could continue against the Galaxy tablet.

"Mr Burley I think you should understand what's open for your clients to come back to us on that stay," Justice Foster said.

"If you wish to extend that stay you'll have to do that in the High Court."

Update: Apple has won a victory at the High Court, with the Samsung Galaxy Tab ban extended until at least December 9. In other words, you might need to start looking elsewhere for that tablet-based Christmas gift... 

Source: Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.

See more about:  samsung  |  apple  |  applevstheworld  |  litigation  |  galaxy tab 101
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Faster, lighter, more juice: meet 20 new laptops with Intel's new chip 

Faster, lighter, more juice: meet 20 new laptops with Intel's new chip

 
New Apple Mac Pro is insanely powerful and looks insane too 

New Apple Mac Pro is insanely powerful and looks insane too

 
Best Android apps this week 

Best Android apps this week

 
Apple and Google petitioned to remove 'gay cure' app 

Apple and Google petitioned to remove 'gay cure' app

 
Making the switch: moving from an iPhone to a Galaxy S4 

Making the switch: moving from an iPhone to a Galaxy S4

 
Comments: 8
FostWare
30 November 2011
Do Apple employ engineers or just lawyers these days?


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Federal Court overturns Samsung Galaxy Tab injunction?
Appeal heads to High Court.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
amcmo
30 November 2011
More lawyers smiling all the way to the bank.

Let's see what Friday brings. (even more lawyers smiling etc)
photohounds
30 November 2011
A unanimous decision by the full bench to throw the claim out doesn't bode well for a High Court reversal, but truth IS sometimes stranger than fiction. These judges must have all had their GLASSES on!

Yes, the lawyers will be smiling. That seems to be the ONLY result of having almost unlimited legal funds.

There are REAL cases waiting and this idiocy simply clogs the court system and denies other PEOPLE their bite at justice, talis qualis.
gnome
30 November 2011

If Apple diverted the millions they now give the lawyers into product development, they really would have a world-beating range.

Probably less fun without the builtin fireworks, though; and then it's tough to think of all those poor lawyers down to their last billion.
amcmo
30 November 2011
It's not a decision to throw the case out entirely. The Injunction has been lifted, however there are still steps in the process. Of course it is stayed until Friday for a potential Apple appeal to the High Court.

Samsung have been ordered to keep extremely detailed sales records while it continues (if Apple proceed) against the possibility of having to pay damages to Apple on final judgement.

Again, time will tell. More rich lawyers, we know that much.
photohounds
30 November 2011
AM, common knowledge that overseas trips and a new Porsche every other year cost big money ... how ELSE could they support those habits without someone's unlimited legal fund?

So Samsung will probably have the 'old' model to sell from Friday, and a 'new' one (that gets around the BS) is already shipping as I understand it ... at $199 even I'd find a use for old one as a super, 'walk-around' music server remote control. The Sammy has a HD format screen that mimics the Music server's desktop.

As a straight pic viewer an ipad would suit just as well.

I'm looking into doing a home brew phase/freq 'perfecter'. Ever have anything to do with DEQX which seems to do all that without the home brew?



leebaldock
5 December 2011
So does this mean the first Judge that made the ruling to stop sales of the Samsung should be fired for incompetence? Or be held liable for the lost sales revenue. I think so. Make a fuckup and you should be held accountable.
amcmo
5 December 2011
The case hasn't been thrown out. Only the injunction was lifted, however Samsung were ordered to keep comprehensive records. In the event the case (set for March?) goes agaimst Samsung they would have to pay penalties based on units sold.

Of course the High Court has re-instated the injunction for another week.

So at this stage, no suggestion of incompetance, just differing interpretation, which is not unusual. He may yet be found to be correct, who knows.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  17%
 
The PlayStation 4
  29%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  54%
TOTAL VOTES: 1325

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads