ISPs rerouting search traffic for cash

ISPs rerouting search traffic for cash

EFF report claims ISPs are craftily profiting from searches made by their users.

Several US ISPs have been rerouting product searches via a third-party proxy to sell the data, researchers claim.

Researchers first noticed the odd redirections at the DNS level earlier this year, but have now uncovered exactly what is happening to the traffic.

According to a report from the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF) and research company ICSI Networking, a firm called Paxfire uses proxies to "selectively siphon search requests", redirecting them via third-party affiliate marketing programmes.

"When the user initiates searches for specific keywords from the browser's URL bar or search bar, the proxy no longer relays the query to the intended search engine, but instead redirects the browser's request through affiliate networks, as the equivalent of a click on advertisements," the EFF explained in a blog post co-authored with ICSI.

"Using the names of popular websites, we have so far identified 170 brand-related keywords that trigger redirections via affiliate programs and result either on the brands' sites or on search assistance pages unrelated to the intended search engine results page."

Some of the brand names include Apple, Dell, Groupon, and the Wall Street Journal, the EFF said, adding "the purpose appears to be monetisation of users' searches".

Paxfire

We couldn't reach Paxfire at the time of publishing, but the company's website said it offers "look-up services", in software, hardware and hosted variations.

Essentially, it's an error rerouting service, so if users type in an incorrect URL it redirects them to a search page. "More specifically, when an end-user types an invalid URL in the address bar of his browser — either a keyword such as 'books' or a mistype such as 'www.amazoooo,cm' — Paxfire can return a standard search results page that will generate revenue for the network operator when an end-user clicks on a paid link," it says on its website.

"Some of our customers literally generate millions of dollars a year using the Paxfire Look-up Service," the company claims.

However, the EFF report said Paxfire has added to that service. "Paxfire's product also includes an optional, unadvertised, and more alarming feature that drastically expands Paxfire's window into users' traffic," the EFF said. "Instead of activating only upon error, this product redirects the customers' entire web search traffic destined for Yahoo, Bing, and sometimes Google, to a small number of separate web traffic proxies."

We're still waiting to hear back from Microsoft and Google, and couldn't reach Yahoo. Virgin Media said it doesn't use Paxfire, and we're still waiting to hear back from BT.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Source: Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing

See more about:  isps  |  rerouting  |  search  |  traffic  |  cash  |  securitysoftware
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia 

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia

 
Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday 

Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday

 
Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN 

Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN

 
Comments: 9
photohounds
8 August 2011
Oh no AM, better ban ISPs - they are using data for their own purposes! Of course the clowd newbie wont do that, eh?


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
ISPs rerouting search traffic for cash?
EFF report claims ISPs are craftily profiting from searches made by their users.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
amcmo
8 August 2011
When have I even said ban Google for it's underhanded practices? - Just be aware of them and treat everything from them with several grains of the preverbial. We choose not to give them any more of our data than absolutely necessary, and we won't be hosting any confidential info on anyone's cloud!

The courts will no doubt rule on whether they have abused market dominance or any other activities that may be illegal.

photohounds
8 August 2011
Well you seemed to imply that the Big G were the only evil empire out there when it came to data. I have said all along that none are squeaky clean and that their abuses roughly equate to the amount of our data they possess.

Those with the most data, have the most opportunity. I join you in choosing to back up my data (other than inconsequential stuff) somewhere more secure thanks.

I have several offsite backup locations - a hangover from being an operator in a backup-mad data environment, I expect. Mind you we have lost NO data on the platform I administered, in at least 25 years.

I don't think offsite backups are paranoia, we don't even need the bad guys to give us grief, the hardware conspires to fail and lose it all :(
amcmo
8 August 2011
I use Google as the example because of their supposed 'no evil' motto, while reality often seems opposite.

I trust no-one with any commercial interest 100%. Just degree's of mis-trust.

Other's not to trust - I worked with OS/2 around the time that MS put the knife in that particular back.
photohounds
8 August 2011
Coorporations that misrepresent their true aims - ubiquitous rather than unique :)

Funny, I was just talking about playing with OS/2 in a Vm this morning (have server & client versions). Great OS for the time, I think the best technically, but commercially a disaster.

Was it arrogance or that nuns advert that killed it?

:)
amcmo
8 August 2011
It was the knife in the back!

IBM couldn't get it ironed out fast enough to respond to the treachery. Once running and tweaked it was more stable than Windows, with better memory management.

18-20 3 1/4 inch floppy's for all features from memory! I think we threw ours out in a cleanup of the dungeon recently.
ory_zm
8 August 2011
Dodo redirects search in the FireFox address bar to a Yahoo search, not sure if they make money out of it. I have tried to "Opt Out" a few times but keep getting it, it's quite a pain!
Slatts
9 August 2011
ory_zm wrote:
Dodo redirects search in the FireFox address bar to a Yahoo search, not sure if they make money out of it. I have tried to "Opt Out" a few times but keep getting it, it's quite a pain!


Your next option would be to opt out of Dodo.

I can't remember ever hearing anything good about them other than cheap (as in nasty).

ory_zm
9 August 2011
Slatts wrote:
ory_zm wrote:
Dodo redirects search in the FireFox address bar to a Yahoo search, not sure if they make money out of it. I have tried to "Opt Out" a few times but keep getting it, it's quite a pain!


Your next option would be to opt out of Dodo.

I can't remember ever hearing anything good about them other than cheap (as in nasty).



I'm actually 100% happy with what I'm getting from them: Unlimited ADSL 2+ for $59.90, their service is actually pretty good. My beef is with Telstra (who services the line) and says that "anything over 1.5Mbps is acceptable" I was even told "you should be glad you can even get ADSL" and that's with me living within the Perth CBD area...
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  24%
 
The PlayStation 4
  30%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  45%
TOTAL VOTES: 141

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads