Samsung to Apple: hand over iPad 3 and iPhone 5

Samsung to Apple: hand over iPad 3 and iPhone 5

The recent court battle between Samsung and Apple has taken another interesting turn, with Samsung demanding that Apple hand over commercial samples of both the iPhone 5 and iPad 3.

The ongoing court battle between Samsung and Apple has taken another interesting turn, with Samsung demanding that Apple hand over commercial samples of both the iPhone 5 and iPad 3.

Photo showdown: iPad 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v

The company filed a motion on Friday asking Apple to turn over the iPhone 5 and iPad 3 as part of the discovery process. (Apple is currently in the process of suing Samsung for numerous patent violations stemming from the sale of the Samsung Galaxy S smartphone and Samsung Galaxy Tab.)

"Samsung is entitled to samples of the next generation iPhone and iPad, as well as those products’ packaging and packaging inserts, in order to prepare its defense against any preliminary injunction motion brought against Samsung by Apple for trademark or trade dress infringement," the motion explains.

Which tablet? Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 vs Apple iPad

In other words, Samsung wants to assess any similarities between Apple's future products and its own, so that its lawyers can prepare for any future lawsuits.

Last week, Apple asked the court to order Samsung to hand over samples of various Galaxy products, including the Galaxy Tab 8.9 and Galaxy S II - so this latest move can be viewed as something of a counter-attack. Indeed, the motion makes reference to "fundamental fairness”; arguing that Apple should be required to give up its future products too.

Of course, neither the iPhone 5 or iPad 3 have officially been announced by Apple at the time of writing - the motion is based on “internet reports” and “Apple’s past practice.”

You can check out a PDF of the full motion here.

Apple issued Samsung with a lawsuit in April, in which it accused its rival of 'slavishly' copying its phone and tablet designs.

“Instead of pursuing independent product development, Samsung has chosen to slavishly copy Apple’s innovative technology, distinctive user interfaces, and elegant and distinctive product and packaging design,” the suit argued. We'll keep you posted with future developments.

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  samsung  |  apple  |  ipad  |  galaxy  |  tab  |  phones  |  mobilecomputing
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Photos: Samsung's Aussie Galaxy S4 launch 

Photos: Samsung's Aussie Galaxy S4 launch

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
Comments: 13
PeteC
30 May 2011
This article would fit in the 1st of April edition.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Samsung to Apple: hand over iPad 3 and iPhone 5?
The recent court battle between Samsung and Apple has taken another interesting turn, with Samsung demanding that Apple hand over commercial samples of both the iPhone 5 and iPad 3.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
photohounds
30 May 2011


Agree,

Especially since Samsung made tablets three YEARS before Apple did:
http://www.samsung.com/uk/business/b2b/products/notebooks/ultra_mobile/q1_ultra.htm

AND:

The iPhone LOOKS like a close imitation of LG's award-winning 'PRADA' phone.
http://www.mad4mobilephones.com/lg-apple-iphone-is-a-prada-phone-copy/478/

Methinks the lady doth protest too much ...
and April 1 should be the release dates for all new hardware.
That way if it's cr*p, they can say "it was a joke" :)


amcmo
30 May 2011
It's a tit-for-tat that most commentators suggest they have little chance of success.

Somewhere down the track, I'm certain they'll swap a few patents and kiss and make up, (after all who wants to totally piss off a $6B and growing customer) though comment out of Intel suggests they'd love to make the most of the spat and start manufacturing Apple branded semi's, POSSIBLY even ARM processor, though that's not their preferred option.

Photohounds, no one accused Apple of copying that Samsung dog of a device. Remember Microsoft have been peddling the Tablet concept for even longer.

Regardless of what side of the MS/Android/Apple fence you stand on, everyone has to admit it took Apple to release a tablet that people actually wanted/could use. Whether they maintain that lead is open to discussion.

Edited by amcmo: 30/5/2011 03:11:48 PM
rubaiyat
30 May 2011
My god you're right.

Apple had a wide choice of triangles, rhomboids, pentangles and sheriff stars to work with, it seems beyond a co-incidence that the iPhone ended up the same shape as Samsung's Prada.

Mind you Samsung could be sued by PGH. I've seen a wide range of bricks that adopted the long rectangular shape going back to at least the 90's. Though to give Samsung its due it reduced the amount of self-harm by most of its users.

After the previous model took a few ears off, rounding the edges and corners was a stroke of genius!

Edited by rubaiyat: 30/5/2011 06:50:12 PM
cootified
1 June 2011
Wow, this sounds like it will go on for a while.
Still, I don't think Apple's 25-billion-per-quarter revenue will be affected.
skarpethinn
28 October 2011
One can hope that now that Jobs is dead, some of the vitriol is gone from Apple's vindictive pursuit of competitors, & these ridiculous battles can settle into something a little more amenable.

But it's Apple, so probably not....
rubaiyat
28 October 2011
I'm curious. Is there nothing that Apple patents that it should defend? If not, why bother with patents?

The competition obviously saves massive amounts of money on not having designers and not putting in the hard yards of developing new markets.

All they need to do is have Apple do the work for them then rip everything off whilst simultaneously slagging Apple for being different.

Then we can go back to the comfortable mediocrity where nobody breaks ranks and dishes out the same rubbish for decade after decade.

When Microsoft first blocked the GUI developed by Apple, then ripped it off, it stopped progress in the computer industry for almost a decade and a half. Not something I look forward to again and not something Apple is going to fall for yet again if it can avoid it.

Let me get this clear, it is not about the nonsense claims of trying to patent rectangular screened devices. None of the many judges around the world who have ruled in Apple's favor have thought so either.
skarpethinn
31 October 2011
So we are talking about the same Apple that wanted to patent the 'i' prefix yes?

My answer to that is to use your very own question: why bother with patents? The sole - yes, SOLE and ONLY - purpose of patents and copyrighting is to make money. Look for a "breach of patent" on a product or idea that failed, & see if there's any legal hooha raised about it.

"Protecting intellectual property" is a load-of-shit statement, used solely to legitimise an argument that is essentially all about greed. "Open market" is another, & so is "free enterprise."
rubaiyat
1 November 2011
Don't be an idiot.

Apple did not "patent" the i prefix, get your terms right.

As part of brand registration it is possible to register distinctive names associated with certain products otherwise we'd all be going to the generics section of the supermarket to pick up a bottle of Veuve Clicquot bottled by Coca Cola in their Bathurst fizzy water plant.

Don't forget that IBM tried to appropriate the term PC for their line of Personal Computers.

All companies are forced to protect their brands or lose them. It may seem draconian at times because they are forced to pursue all the guerrilla copies all the time. Once one gets away with it and establishes a precedence you can kiss all your expensive marketing and brand development goodbye.
amcmo
1 November 2011
Skarpethinn

I cannot believe you are seriously suggesting IP protection is a load of shit!

What is all about greed are companies who wait for a market leader to spend months or even years and $millions developing a market changing product, then rush out rip off copies designed solely ride the coattails f he company that invested all the time and money.

Ignoring the current Apple Samsungbstoush, there are enough examples out there of rip off merchants copying the hardware, or a play on the established name to ride a market at minimal cost.
skarpethinn
1 November 2011
yes, amcmo, and there always will be, regardless of the restrictions of legislation, or how harsh the laws may get.

Doesn't make the fundaments of the idea any less flawed.

i'm not even going to dignify rubaiyat with answer. "Veuve Clicquot bottled by Coca Cola"? Seriously? That is your retort?

Edited by skarpethinn: 1/11/2011 08:32:17 PM
rubaiyat
2 November 2011
Yes, and if you don't understand the process there isn't any way to discuss it intelligently with you.

You are a bar room lawyer who can't get your head around the principles, but won't let that stop you trying to get your mouth around it.
skarpethinn
2 November 2011
two thumbs up!!
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Competitions

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag! 

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag!

Win a Defiance prize pack and join the fight now!
 

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1634

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads