Announcement: a new winner of an A.C.Ryan Playon!HD mini

Announcement: a new winner of an A.C.Ryan Playon!HD mini

We braced ourselves for a lively discussion when we asked you to tell us whether Internet piracy is wrong. Read on to find who won the media player…

Recently we've been running a competition to win a shiny new A.C.Ryan Playon!HD mini, kindly supplied by the excellent people at A.C.Ryan. The player is valued at $139, and is a very handy device to have in your lounge room, if you're keen on watching that hard drive full of 1080p video files on your TV.

To win, we asked you to tell us about an incredibly common pastime for Internet users, but one that is still mired in controversy and legal issues - Internet piracy. While most of the debate surrounds the legalities, we wanted you to give us some insight into your attitudes. Do you think Internet piracy is wrong and why, or why not.

The answers were many and varied. A common theme, and one we hear all the time, is that Australian TV networks (or movie distributors) make it hard to watch your favourite shows - shows are on too late, or not at all.

As Jaker1993 pointed out, broadcast shows in Australia at the same time as they're shown overseas, and you might solve the problem. 

One of the few to take a hard line reading of the law was farel, who criticised the "self-justification" of those who pirate. "We can't have an economy if theft is normalised as a private liberty," he said.

There were many who blamed the copyright owners and content distributors for the problem, but also a few who questioned this line of argument. Like Slatts, who called on pirates to "Just stop kidding yourself about how it's the producers or distributors fault that you're forced to steal it. You were doing fine without the stuff before someone spent hours/ days/ weeks... whatever to produce and you'll not be more than inconvenienced to continue to live without it."

Another to defend the rights of copyright holders was rubaiyat, and credit to Cyberglitch for pointing out that Steam is an effective model for giving users a taste before they buy.

With so many comments, choosing a winner was difficult. In the end we chose Paul K, whose post pointed out the uncertainty over "who I hurt" that has clouded the issue, despite his opinion that "taking something without paying for it is wrong".

Thanks to everyone who took part, and stay tuned for news of other competitions in the future.

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  competition
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
A real archer on the accuracy of in-game bow-shooting 

A real archer on the accuracy of in-game bow-shooting

 
Unboxed: Thermaltake Chaser A41 

Unboxed: Thermaltake Chaser A41

 
Unboxed: ASUS' Limited Edition ROG ARES II  

Unboxed: ASUS' Limited Edition ROG ARES II

 
Unboxed: Apple's latest 27in iMac 

Unboxed: Apple's latest 27in iMac

 
Comments: 4
Sputnik
27 May 2011
Can you publish the winning comment here?


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Announcement: a new winner of an A.C.Ryan Playon!HD mini?
We braced ourselves for a lively discussion when we asked you to tell us whether Internet piracy is wrong. Read on to find who won the media player…

What do you think? Join the discussion.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
27 May 2011
Sputnik wrote:
Can you publish the winning comment here?

http://www.pcauthority.com.au/forums/yaf_postst53414_Win-this-ACRyan-PlayonHD-mini-movie-streamer-tell-us-why-or-why-not-Internet-piracy-is-wrong.aspx


Also, congrats Paul! :)
Paul K
27 May 2011
I believe that most people accept that taking something without paying for it is wrong. But there is wrong like knocking over an elderly person and taking their money or the wrong everyone does occasionally, which doesn't seem to harm anyone.

I could do things the right way, wait for my show to come onto TV, be sure to be home and watching it at that time (hoping there is nothing else on another channel that I might like to watch. It will take me an hour to watch 42minutes of the TV show (because of ads). If i miss an episode, I can hope that they repeat it sometime in the future, or pay a large amount of money to buy the DVD set, to watch the episode(s) i missed.

Or I could do it the wrong way, I could click one button on a torrent website (or automate the download with rss feeds and no need for even 1 click), and have it appear in my media centre (running media browser) with cast list & a description of the episode. I will be watching it within hours of the US broadcast (and not months behind, if it is ever shown here).

The question of who I hurt is a bit grey. If it was transmitted here, free to air, I could have watched it for free. The feeling is, I wouldn't have paid before, why should I pay now?

I constantly hear reports about the billions of dollars that movie studios are losing to piracy, but they seem to be earning larger profits each year. That’s hard to understand, if they are losing so much money, why are they making more money?

Since method 2 satisfies everything I want, it is easy to find a justification to continue doing exactly what I find easiest. That's human nature.

The solution is somewhere in the middle. I would happily pay all the costs of distribution of the movie (my internet connection) to avoid ads, and up to 50c an episode if it was convenient to use, required no propriety software and I could play it on any PC in the house, my ipad and android phone. If it was a show I enjoyed, I would be willing to pay considerably more to ensure it was not cancelled (like Firefly). While I would not demand that pilots be free, I expect it would be good marketing to do so.

I might even be willing to buy in to a TV show before it was made. I like the concept, I know shows that the director and writers have made before (and love them), and am willing to become an investor for $100 for the 1st season. For that $100 I own the season, and if it does well (demand is high, and it earns well) I get a dividend back.

These days TV must be on demand, it’s what the customer wants. If the studios won’t give us that, people will continue to use alternates.
Paul K
27 May 2011
And thank you for the prize.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  26%
 
The PlayStation 4
  30%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  44%
TOTAL VOTES: 123

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads