avast! brings gratis AV protection to OS X with avast! Free Antivirus for Mac beta

avast! brings gratis AV protection to OS X with avast! Free Antivirus for Mac beta

Mac owners have long been notoriously smug about the lack of viruses for their chosen operating system, but it is far from true to say that viruses do not exist for OS X.

In reality, the platform has simply been of little interest to virus writers and coders of malicious software, but recent news stories have highlighted the fact that Mac are just as vulnerable as other computers. avast! Free Antivirus for Mac is – and there’s a clue in the name – a free antivirus tools for Mac, and a new beta version has just been released.

Coming from a well-respected name such as avast! you would be right to expect great things from the application, and things certainly bode well. Although there is a memory resident virus scanner that is constantly on the lookout for potential viruses, on-demand scanning is available. If you want to be thorough you can opt to scan your entire system, but you can also perform custom scans or check only in your Home folder. Individual files can be scanned by dragging them onto a special drop zone in the corner of the application window.

Additional protection is provided by three different ‘shields’. The Web Shield is used to ensure that the web sites you visit and the files you download are free from viruses. This involves re-configuring your network settings (this is done automatically) and the application even warns that this could lead to problems, but in our tests everything continued to work smoothly.

Of course, viruses are not always delivered via web sites; emails can also be the source of infected files. The Mail Shield monitors IMAP and POP3 email accounts and stops any infected files that are detected dead in their tracks. Finishing off the package is the File Shield which checks to ensure that the files and applications you are working have not been maliciously modified.

Even with all of the shields activated, avast! did not seem to impact greatly on system performance. Automatic updates are supposed to ensure protection against all of the latest threats, but not updates were released while we were testing the software.

You can find out more and download a copy of the software by paying a visit to the avast! Free Antivirus for Mac beta review page.

This article originally appeared at softwarecrew.co.uk

Source: Copyright Software Crew

See more about:  av  |  avast  |  beta  |  mac  |  osx  |  protection  |  security  |  virus
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Photos: Google's Project Glass 

Photos: Google's Project Glass

 
In Pictures: (Almost) Live from Mars 

In Pictures: (Almost) Live from Mars

 
In Pictures: Amazing tech projects from Microsoft's Imagine Cup  

In Pictures: Amazing tech projects from Microsoft's Imagine Cup

 
Timeline: Supercomputing 

Timeline: Supercomputing

 
In pictures: Vocus lays cross-harbour fibre 

In pictures: Vocus lays cross-harbour fibre

 
Comments: 4
magnus
27 May 2011
Sophos released a free antivirus for OSX some time ago.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
avast! brings gratis AV protection to OS X with avast! Free Antivirus for Mac beta?
Mac owners have long been notoriously smug about the lack of viruses for their chosen operating system, but it is far from true to say that viruses do not exist for OS X.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
DJ...
28 May 2011
"In reality, the platform has simply been of little interest to virus writers and coders of malicious software, but recent news stories have highlighted the fact that Mac are just as vulnerable as other computers."

What evidence is there for this statement? Yes, Macs are vulnerable but no where near "as vulnerable as other computers". I think every Windows user would know someone who has been affected by Windows malware, but I can't think of anyone I know who has been affected by Mac malware. And can anyone name a Mac virus in the wild?

MacDefender, the latest 'tragedy' to hit the Mac world, is not a virus, it's a trojan and uses social engineering to be run initially anyway. And it certainly hasn't affected the Mac community the same way as some Windows malware where it is sometimes estimated that 10% of all users have been affected. Windows malware has brought down companies' systems for hours if not days, never heard of even one instance of that happening in the Mac world.

So to say that "Mac are just as vulnerable as other computers" is just scare mongering by people using a second rate operating system. Although the statement could be true when comparing MacOSX to Linux where neither have been overly affected.

How about PC&Tech Authority doing a proper comparison between Windows and MacOSX and look at how Windows exposes users to a single point of failure in the "registry" whereas MacOSX doesn't. Why do Windows users have to reload all of their applications when they re-install their operating system to clear malware, but Mac uses don't have to reload applications? There are heaps of reasons why MacOSX is better than Windows, besides being more user friendly and easier to use.

And these Mac anti-virus programs, where is the list of Mac viruses they detect or is it that they detect Windows viruses that may be passing through a Mac? How about PC&Tech do an internal investigation into one of these programs to see exactly what it is they detect and give a comparative result on the number of Mac viruses versus Windows viruses that these "Mac" programs detect? Does any anti-malware programs for a PC detect and destroy MacOSX malware, or are they too busy detecting Windows malware to bother?
rubaiyat
28 May 2011
How about PC&Tech simply prints a list of all known viruses for MacOSX and Windows.

Quickly doing the maths, based on the following data:

Symantec reported 1,122,311 viruses detected by the end of 2008

Lets assume smallest legible 6 on 7pt type with a 3 col. 57p standard magazine layout:

No. Virus reported 2008 / No Col / Entries per column

1,122,311 / 3 / 91

= 4111 Magazine Pages

Total thickness of the magazine = 247mm*

The Vol 2 addendum to cover 2008-2011 would probably be equal size.

Of the two 25cm thick publications, all known Mac viruses (in 2011) would be approx. the last 2 cm of the last column on the last page of vol 2.

NB That the Mac malware is not actually viruses but are instead trojans, and pretty feeble ones at that.

It raises the interesting question: "Is there really any other software, to speak of, on Windows other than malware?"

The bulk of software on Windows appears to be malicious, which says something about the people who use the platform.


* Calibre 90gsm A2 stock = 0.12mm, 2 pages per sheet.

Edited by rubaiyat: 30/5/2011 09:16:47 AM
DJ...
1 June 2011
Thanks Rubalyat. Sort of puts the claim "recent news stories have highlighted the fact that Mac are just as vulnerable as other computers." into perspective. A bit like saying that an ant is the same as an elephant because they are both animals.

But then these "news stories" probably appeared in PC magazines which write mostly about nothera warped reality called Windows. :-)
Comments have been disabled for this article.
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Federal Budget 2013: So what are you going to be required to pay?
15 May 2013
Opinion: Want a handy summary of the 2013 federal budget? Here is one by Newcastle accountants ...
Architects: another profession on the list of people using Evernote
10 May 2013
Yes, apparently the hugely popular Evernote note-syncing app is also being used by people who ...
In Brisbane? Setting up a business?
10 May 2013
Too embarrassed to ask even the most basic questions? Here's your chance to find out about ...
Worried about staff losing the office keys?
8 May 2013
Here's an interesting idea: a system which lets you assign a digital office "key" to your ...
Need a LOT more storage?
7 May 2013
Do you have multiple offices or servers? Are your systems requiring so much storage your IT ...

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 1727

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads