Memo to Nokia: time to get a move on

Memo to Nokia: time to get a move on

Opinion: Barry Collins says neither Nokia nor Microsoft can afford to wait until 2012 to deliver Windows Phone 7 handsets

The smartphone market “is now a three-horse race”, declared Nokia CEO Stephen Elop, having just bet his shirt on Windows Phone 7 to catch up with Apple iOS and Google Android. But is Nokia riding one of those three horses?

Nokia’s decision to saddle itself with Microsoft’s mobile OS is a brave and, in my view, correct one. Yet, Nokia’s going to have to get a move on. The company says it will be late 2011 or even early 2012 before we see the first Nokia Windows Phone 7 handset – and neither company can afford to wait that long.

Nokia could have bought itself a little more time had Elop not poured a can of petrol over the rest of the company’s products, then stepped back and lit a match. In a memo that made Gerald Ratner look like a salesman extraordinaire, Elop said Nokia was “standing on a burning platform”, having fallen “years behind” its rivals. “The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that’s close to its experience,” the Nokia boss bemoaned.

It’s going to be at least another nine months before he does. In the meantime, who in their right mind is going to buy a Symbian smartphone?

Not only has the man in charge of the company admitted they’re about as cutting edge as Jimmy Savile, but developers will be leaving the platform in their droves. As Elop himself stated in his excoriating memo: “The battle of devices has now become a war of ecosystems, where ecosystems include not only the hardware and software of the device, but developers, applications....” Elop has effectively put up the “closed” sign until the end of the year.

The wait is equally bad news for Microsoft and Windows Phone 7, which is hardly a juggernaut of momentum right now. Only two million Windows Phone 7 handsets were “shipped” in the operating system’s first three months; Apple sold almost as many (1.7 million) iPhone 4 handsets in its first three days. Meanwhile, Google claims it’s activating 350,000 Android handsets daily. If this really is a three-horse race, Microsoft is several furlongs behind the leaders.

The handset manufacturers that backed Windows Phone 7 from the off are hardly going to be enamoured with the Nokia deal, either. Microsoft is almost certainly offering Nokia – which remains the world’s biggest handset manufacturer, lest we forget – far better terms than it’s offered previous partners such as HTC, Samsung and LG. Although Nokia will pay Microsoft to license Windows Phone 7, billions more dollars will flow the other way in terms of marketing and other “monetary” support, according to Elop.

Windows Phone 7 wobble

Little wonder, then, that those original Windows Phone 7 partners appear to be turning their backs on Microsoft. HTC launched five smartphones and one tablet at Mobile World Congress – all running Android. Samsung announced its Galaxy S II, the successor to the most successful Android handset on the market, while LG’s ground-breaking 3D smartphone is also built on the Google OS. The three companies didn’t announce a single new Windows Phone 7 handset between them. It isn’t only Nokia that has to wait until Christmas for a decent Windows Phone 7 handset, it could be Microsoft and its app developers too.

Does this mean the Nokia and Microsoft marriage is meaningless? Not necessarily. The Nokia/Microsoft alliance won’t harm Apple or Google – they’re already far too well established for the duo to wreak any significant damage.

Instead, the biggest threat is to the company Elop rather cruelly excluded from his three-horse line-up: RIM and its BlackBerry. Neither iOS nor Android has really infiltrated the business space. Nobody is rolling out swathes of iPhones or Galaxy S handsets across their organisation in the way they do with BlackBerrys.

Nokia has impeccable business credentials. From the wonderfully clunky Communicator right up to relatively modern handsets such as the E71, the company has produced some classic corporate devices. Nokia makes superb keyboards, and the battery life of its phones (admittedly, aided by the underpowered Symbian) is measured in days, not the single day afforded by most modern smartphones.

Windows Phone 7 also has plenty to offer business users, including impeccable Exchange integration (provided you don’t use a self-certified SSL certificate) and Office Web Apps. It has a fair few things to sort out – not least email encryption, company-wide remote management, and being able to connect to a hidden SSID – but at least it now has a few months to do so.

If the Nokia/Microsoft partnership can produce a decent selection of business-class handsets – and quickly – they really could be the third runner in the smartphone race, rather than the three-legged horse they’re widely regarded as at the moment.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Source: Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing

See more about:  memo  |  nokia  |  move
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

First Look: MSI Z87 Mpower MAX Motherboard 

First Look: MSI Z87 Mpower MAX Motherboard

 
How to: 15 Excel features  to master your data 

How to: 15 Excel features to master your data

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
What the Battlefield 4 promo art tells us about the game 

What the Battlefield 4 promo art tells us about the game

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Comments: 4
ron3kl
2 May 2011
I have to disagree that the move to Windows Phone 7 is the right one. The reasons are ones you've listed yourself.
First the shipments of WP7 are woeful - even in the December 2010 quarter, Symbian shipped 10 times that of WP7 (30.1 million cw 3.1 million, Canalys.com). What's more, that's still way ahead of Apple (at 16m) and also a significant increase in real terms on Nokia's December 2009 quarter. Symbian may be behind in its user interface but its still selling in significant numbers worldwide, but just not in the USA.
Then, as you've point out, other handset makers do not seem to be all that keen on WP7. Looks like it could be that Nokia abandons one OS with a huge installed user base for a big gamble on another OS that seems less popular, thereby alienating their existing customers in the process.
Just check out the Nokia worldwide developer and user forums to get a sense of the anger at Steve Elop and the move to dump Symbian.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Memo to Nokia: time to get a move on?
Opinion: Barry Collins says neither Nokia nor Microsoft can afford to wait until 2012 to deliver Windows Phone 7 handsets

What do you think? Join the discussion.
DJ...
8 May 2011
Steve Elop os an APple plant. :-)
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
8 May 2011
WP7 is Nokia's only hope ron3kl. You're looking at current figures, but you're conveniently ignoring trends. Symbian based phones are being purchased at a decreasing rate, whilst modern smartphone OSs are becoming more attractive. WP7 matched with a globally recognised brand is probably their best shot. Android would have been a good idea too, but Steve Elop is a an ex MS employee, so I guess that was never on the table. :P
amcmo
9 May 2011
Wouldn't agree with the W7 is the only option.

If Nokia didn't want to go Android, they could have spent the next 12 months doing a MASSIVE upgrade on Symbian, or MeeGo. It's going to take them that long to have any meaningful W7 product out there. Symbian is still a nice O/S, within it's limitations, and could have been made a damn site better. They just squandered the past 3 years mainly sitting on their hands.

I think with W7 they've hitched themselves to a looser. I don't think Nika is necessarily a gonner, there's a HUGE bottom end market in developing countries that gives them some breathing room, but they'd better not waste too mcuh time.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  29%
 
The PlayStation 4
  23%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  48%
TOTAL VOTES: 62

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads