Lessons from the Vodafail web site

Lessons from the Vodafail web site

What does it take to get your complaint heard - money or agitation like the Vodafail web site?

Large-scale and very public consumer outpourings such as Vodafail work because they attract the attention of the media and can force a telco into apologising and offering to address the network issues.

It shows that people power if a force to be reckoned with and that companies can almost be brought undone by such bad publicity especially if it brings with it significant customer desertion.

Just last week Vodafail creator Adam Brimo even won the consumer watchdog Choice Consumer Champion Award. Brimo set up the web site in frustration as significant network problems and poor customer service and it just snowballed attracting many thousands of similarly frustrated Vodafone customers. It prompted a class action and a very public apology from CEO Nigel Dews and a class action for redress.

The award recognises Brimo’s tech-savvy activism that ignited the fury of Vodafone customers and no doubt had other telco and ISP CEOs looking on with fear. Brimo has since submitted a report to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) cataloguing the complaints.

A less public route is to use the formal complaint channels such as the Telecommunications  Industry Ombudsman (TIO) dispute resolution service. If all other means have failed, this can be the court of last appeal, but it really only works if there is a significant financial penalty if the telcos cannot resolve problems themselves and keep disgruntled consumers away from the TIO.

Telco consumer advocacy group ACCAN wants to see the TIO strengthened including the option to award compensation to customers where consumer obligations have not been met. It says that industry wide customer service and complaint handling procedures must be improved and hitting telcos through the bottom line is needed as part of the strengthening measures to lower the number of complaints from its high of more than 200,000 in recent years.

These two examples show that there are very different ways to go about getting a problem resolved. Of course another path is to share your complaint with us. But the numerous options for complaints tells us the industry needs reform on customer service.

Is it fair to draw so much attention to telco failures? Add your comment below.

 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  investigator
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
Unboxed: ASUS' Limited Edition ROG ARES II  

Unboxed: ASUS' Limited Edition ROG ARES II

 
Comments: 2
elfalot
7 April 2011
Fair? They should admit it (if only in the slightest) to prevent the people who GIVE THEM MONEY for a service, from doing things like this, not to mention actually preventing and/or fixing things and stopping the situation from getting so bad that they need this sort of attention.

So, its not just fair it's outright justified!


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Lessons from the Vodafail web site?
What does it take to get your complaint heard - money or agitation like the Vodafail web site?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
petergaskin
7 April 2011
You shouldnt have to go to the lengths of Vodafail to get your point across, but what are the options?
Who can afford to take a telco or isp to court? Once you get on the court merry go round, you are likely to win the war but lose the battle. So the first court says you won your case, and awards compensation and costs - hopefully. So the loser appeals the decision and the case goes to teh next level of court. Of course the costs of fighting the case rise. you win again, but the lsoer isnt prepared to accept the first 2 court decisions, so they appeal again. Suddenly you are faced with a 420,000 legal bill to continue fighting the case. if you lose, you face a legal bill of $400,000 from the ISP or telco.
If you decide you cant continue fighting the case, then you lose. And you will be asked to pay the telco or Isp costs.
Our legal system has no relevance for the average consumer. thsu we have to find new ways to fight Isdps and telcos.
Ultimately Government agencies fining Telcos and Isps are the only way of keeping them honest.
it costs real money to provide real customer service, and this bites in to the bonuses that executives can earn.
So you target customer service at the top 20% of your customers and forget the rest. it is the 20/80 rule of business - 20% of customers provide 80% of profits. Businesses have been running according to this rule for nearly 20 years now. So I am not sure if bussinesses will be prepared to break the 20/80 rule...
Its all about senior executives and top management and their precious bonuses.. Nothing to do with shareholders or or customers.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Competitions

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag! 

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag!

Win a Defiance prize pack and join the fight now!
 

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1637

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads