Pale Moon 4 is a speed-optimized version of Firefox 4

Pale Moon 4 is a speed-optimized version of Firefox 4

Pale Moon 4 offers a stripped down version of Firefox that is optimised for speed and efficiency.

In the web browser wars, it has long been the case that two names crop up again and again – Internet Explorer and Firefox. In more recent years, alternatives such as Opera and Chrome have entered the fray, but it is still these two names that get mentioned most frequently.

Where Firefox differs from Microsoft’s web browser is in the fact that it is open source, which means that anyone is free to work with the code behind the app. This is precisely how Pale Moon came into being, offering a stripped down version of Firefox that is optimised for speed and efficiency.

As Pale Moon is based on the latest Firefox 4 code, it is possible to take advantage of all of the latest features and enhancements that have been included, while eliminating superfluous features that, for most people, serve little purpose other than using up value system resources. The idea behind Pale Moon stemmed from the fact that Firefox has been designed for maximum compatibility with as wide a range of computer, and this includes very old systems.

By cutting out support for older systems, Pale Moon works with an optimized code base that takes full advantage of modern processor instruction sets. The idea of features being removed from a browser may seem like a step in the wrong directions, but when you consider that it is features such as accessibility options, parental controls, crash reporting, and ActiveX support that have been stripped out, it is easy to see that only things that are superfluous to most people’s requirements have been removed.

In practice all of this means that you can take full advantage of all of the latest features of Firefox, while benefitting from enhance performance. This is particularly noticeable on sites that make heavy use of scripting, but in general use you will undoubtedly notice that a large proportion of page load faster and that the browser feel generally more responsive.

In terms of general look and feel, Pale Moon is virtually indistinguishable from Firefox. As it uses the same basic code base, the browser looks and operates in an identical fashion, and making the switch from one browser to the other involves no learning curve whatsoever. If you have become used to customising Firefox with Personas, this can still be achieved in Pale Moon, leaving you free to sit back and reap the speed benefits.

There are two versions of Pale Moon available, each relating to different release branches of Firefox. Pale Moon 3.6.15 is the last version to follow the 3.x branch of the Firefox release schedule, while Pale Moon 4.0 is the optimized version of Firefox 4. There are standardportable and experimental x64 versions available.

You can find out more and download a copy of this browser by paying a visit to the Pale Moon Review page.

This article originally appeared at softwarecrew.co.uk

Source: Copyright Software Crew

See more about:  browser  |  chrome  |  firefox  |  ie  |  internet  |  opera  |  software  |  web
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
New list of soon-to-be NBN-enabled suburbs released 

New list of soon-to-be NBN-enabled suburbs released

 
Best Android apps this week 

Best Android apps this week

 
Unboxed: Oculus Rift Developers Kit 

Unboxed: Oculus Rift Developers Kit

 
50 Essential Online Services 

50 Essential Online Services

 
Comments: 3
Slatts
9 April 2011
I started playing with pale moon last night.

It seem to be faster than FF4.0 and unlike when I loaded ff4 it didn't find all my bookmarks from previous versions.

Perhaps some of the chrome users here might like to have a look and see how it performs in their estimation?

Cyb3r?...




Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Pale Moon 4 is a speed-optimized version of Firefox 4?
Pale Moon 4 offers a stripped down version of Firefox that is optimised for speed and efficiency.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
9 April 2011
Chrome still renders faster from what my limited testing shows. The main reason I use Chrome is because of the intuitive omnibar, the speed is a plus.
Slatts
10 April 2011
.:Cyb3rGlitch:. wrote:
Chrome still renders faster from what my limited testing shows. The main reason I use Chrome is because of the intuitive omnibar, the speed is a plus.


Fair enough. And I still use Firefox because I've got it set up how I like it.

As for the bookmarks, passwords etc., I've set up my sync account now in Pale moon and all that is now available.

For those who aren't familiar with sync, it lives in the tools menu and allows you to keep an encrypted copy of your user names, passwords, preferences, history and tabs.

When you set up sync, it generates a 26 character key that, with your user name and password, allows you to access your info from any device that's running Firefox 4 or Pale moon 4.

I don't remember seeing it in FF3 though I could be wrong about that...

Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Competitions

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag! 

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag!

Win a Defiance prize pack and join the fight now!
 

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1650

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads