Kogan offers Australia's cheapest LED TV - but does cheap mean nasty?

Kogan offers Australia's cheapest LED TV - but does cheap mean nasty?

Do you get what you pay for when it comes to dirt-cheap televisions? Adam Turner breaks down the key features to look for, and explains that the most important factor is not on the spec list

Do you get what you pay for when it comes to dirt-cheap televisions? Aussie online retailer Kogan Technologies has once more thrown down the gauntlet to old world retailers such as Harvey Norman. Kogan claims to offer Australia’s cheapest LED TV - a 16-inch 720p model with built-in PVR for a mere $159. Also on offer is Australia’s only LED TV with built-in Blu-ray - a 32-inch 1080p model with Blu-ray Player and PVR for $749.

So how do you know whether these televisions are any good if you can’t walk into the store and see for yourself? That’s the risk of shopping online sight-unseen, you’re taking a bit of a gamble.

Of course many people just walk into a store with a tape measure and buy the biggest television they can afford. Perhaps they’re swayed by the store assistant’s suggestions, often steered towards sets which offer the biggest profit margin and have the colour cranked up to catch your eye. No offence, but if this sounds like you then you may as well save your money and buy online from stores such as Kogan.

If you’re a discerning shopper with an eye for picture quality, you can start by taking a look at the spec sheet. When looking at LCDs, the key things to consider are

- Screen size; How big is too big? If you can’t sit at least twice the screen size away from a television, it’s probably too big for the room.

- Backlighting technology; CCFL or LED? Side/Edge-lit or Back/Matrix Lit? LED matrix-lit offers a great LCD picture, in part thanks to impressive brightness and contrast.

- Refresh rate; 50, 100 or 200Hz? Don’t settle for 50Hz on anything bigger than 32-inches. 100Hz will suffice if you’re on a budget.

- Resolution; You’ll struggle to tell 720p from 1080p unless your screen is bigger than 32 inches.

- Tuners; Consider high-def digital tuners mandatory.

- Inputs - look for at least two HDMI inputs.

Beyond the spec sheet
Of course you can’t judge a television by the spec sheet alone. All the LCD panels come from the same handful of factories, but that doesn’t mean all televisions are equal.

Back-end video processing is the secret sauce when it comes to television, and that relies on the manufacturer’s expertise. Most televisions can make a perfect picture look good, but the true test of a television is how well it handles a less than perfect picture. Remember, for the foreseeable future, most of what you watch won’t be in 1080p. How does a television handle upscaling, pixelation and motion blur? Does it suffer from black crush, with the darkest shades of grey all appearing black so you lose details in the shadows?

This is when you need to trust your eyes. You’re taking a gamble when buying sight-unseen, forcing you to rely on reputation and reviews (by both journalists and customers). When you buy a brand-name television in a store, sometimes you’re paying for picture video processing. But sometimes - as Ruslan Kogan is fond of pointing out - you’re just paying for the name, along with overheads such as marketing and retail costs.

So are Kogan’s televisions junk? It’s impossible to say for sure unless you’ve seen one, which I haven’t.

In terms of bang for your buck they're unlikely to be worse than some of the junk I've seen on the shelves selling for a lot more. If you’re a bargain hunter you’ll probably be satisfied, but when it comes to high-end televisions I suspect you still get what you pay for.

 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  kogan  |  tv
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Most pirated movies of 2011 

Most pirated movies of 2011

 
Auto tech: Top 5 cars of 2012 

Auto tech: Top 5 cars of 2012

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 ads take a dig at Apple 

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 ads take a dig at Apple

 
Top ten password cracking techniques 

Top ten password cracking techniques

 
Why do we still pay for home phones? 

Why do we still pay for home phones?

 
Comments: 13
SteveB
21 January 2011
We go to read this article to see if Kogan TV's are cheap and nasty, and what do we read....."""So are Kogan’s televisions junk? It’s impossible to say for sure unless you’ve seen one, which I haven’t."""
What a waist of time "Adam Turner". We view these articles to read what a so call expert has to say about a product, and this "clown" Adam Turner, hasn't even tested the product he is commenting on. Tell him go go back and count paper clips, he obviously dose that job better.



Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Kogan offers Australia's cheapest LED TV - but does cheap mean nasty? ?
Do you get what you pay for when it comes to dirt-cheap televisions? Adam Turner breaks down the key features to look for, and explains that the most important factor is not on the spec list

What do you think? Join the discussion.
Anji
21 January 2011
SteveB is stating the obvious. what a total waste of an article. I do read all these articles (via email links) for information. this one says nothing.

I have bought Kogan TV and for what i paid its brilliant. A small 16inch LCD with DVD for the bedroom..And...I based the buying decision on articles I have read from Online magazines such as this one...

So to the Editors..when you place aa article teaser in the emails please make sure that there is a point to be made...otherwise a waste of time
Rallygreg
21 January 2011
Read the whole article only to be let down by a reviewer that isn't reviewing anything.
sparhawk2
21 January 2011
You've got to be joking. How can you write a review about something you haven't even reviewed. Absolutely useless article with no real information. I expect better than this from PC & Tech Authority. Hopefully the author didn't receive payment for this one.
et_tu_brute
21 January 2011
Gee Mt. Tiurner. Thanks for helping me save some money.... by not buying a magazine with an areticle about a product that hasn't been reviewed. There's also the issue of 5 minutes of my time wasted forever too!
rubaiyat
22 January 2011
I gather the "waist of time" is what nerds get from sitting in front of their computers/TVs eating junk food day in day out.
ziggyzap
23 January 2011
The article states: Screen size; How big is too big? If you can’t sit at least twice the screen size away from a television, it’s probably too big for the room.

This sort of antiquated reasoning may have applied to the old CRT 620 line TVs, because if you sat too close, the resolution was so rotten that you could see the lines.

With the sort of 1080p type resolution from modern LCD and plasma screens, you can't see the pixels even at a range of a metre, so this rule does not apply, especially when one is trying to create a home theatre environment.

Go to the movies and even from the back seats, the screen edge-to-edge angle of view is no less than 60 degrees. So to achieve the same situation in a lounge room home theatre setup, for a viewing distance of 2 metres, the edge-to-edge screen width would have to be around 2.5 metres and there is no flat screen TV available.

Therefore there is no such thing as a high resolution flat screen TV that is too big, because even the biggest one is not big enough to give you the same theatre experience as the movies.

It's time to ditch all this olde-worlde thinking.
rubaiyat
23 January 2011
…and everyone knows that the fat TV screen in the fat TV room in the fat house of the fat people using the resources of a small power station, on all the time with no-one watching, is the epitome of modern quality lifestyle because it emulates the modern small, tacky cinemas smelling of popcorn bought in buckets the size of cement mixers with people talking at the back or on their phones, so you can barely make out the endless ads despite they are at ear drum shattering volume.

Sophisticated executive types know quality is best measured with a tape measure, and has lots of loud noises and explosions.

Who are these wankers who say you should see the Mona Lisa in the Louvre?

I've seen plenty bigger paintings. It's barely bigger than an iPad! And it's just some bird with all her clothes on, just sitting there, not even running away from an explosion! Not even in 3D!

Huh! Leonard da Vinci! Genius? More like a big fat loser!
Slatts
23 January 2011
Da Vinci was an innovator.

If he were alive today, I'm sure he would use any and all tech available.

La Gioconda would probably have tasteful tats and discrete piercings....

Hum.. may have overdone the oxymoron's there..

rubaiyat wrote:
I gather the "waist of time" is what nerds get from sitting in front of their computers/TVs eating junk food day in day out.


I resent that. My wife sees to it that I eat only healthy food.

I won't dignify the "waist" slur.

Still, if anonymously belittling others in forums helps you feel better about yourself, that's fine.

Better that than having you walking into a post office with a gun..

rubaiyat
23 January 2011
Hey Slatts,

Nice of you to stand up for the spag munching dago poofter!

There, was the bouncing ball big enough for you to notice?
Slatts
23 January 2011
rubaiyat wrote:
Hey Slatts,

Nice of you to stand up for the spag munching dago poofter!

There, was the bouncing ball big enough for you to notice?


Some of my best mates are spag munching dago poofter!

How can I stay cranky at an avatar like that?

Seriously though, you don't have to carry on like a certified prick to make a comment.

Everyone who reads the stuff on this forum knows you have stuff to offer. Try keeping it down to a dull roar.

I also agree that the TV arms race and the perceived need to aircondition every habitable space to a temperature at which raw meat won't spoil has lead to the need for more and bigger power stations.

This contributes more CO2 and CFCs to the atmosphere, at the same time causing the sedentary population to become acclimatised to 18C at 50%RH and therefore unable to leave there house on more than 5 days in a given year. (decreasing by about 0.2 days per year)

I don't argue with your message, just your delivery.

Oh, and by the way, did you know that 87.63% of all quoted statistics are made up on the spot?



rubaiyat
24 January 2011
…and the remaining 18.37% are sarcasm, my weapon of choice.

In case you were wondering, the 5% discrepancy is being held in the Cayman Islands. To help find a cure for innumeracy. ;)
ory_zm
24 January 2011
Is it just me or lately this site has been starting to fill up with content with no content? seems like sometimes they are only trying to make it look full.. really disappointing!
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  25%
 
The PlayStation 4
  29%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  46%
TOTAL VOTES: 114

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads