Opinion: Has Apple lost the plot?

Opinion: Has Apple lost the plot?

Music store releases music, prompts worldwide gasps of awe. Has the media lost perspective, or has Apple?

Perhaps you, like me, watched with increasing incredulity as media outlet after media outlet slotted “The Beatles finally on iTunes” onto their front pages yesterday. 

iTunes is a music store, the Beatles is music. These two things go together. Okay, so it’s taken a while and there’s a nice yarn about it, but – really?

Maybe I  just lack perspective – I thought “Green Day for Rock Band!” was excessive, and I’ve been a Green Day fan since 1990. The Beatles entire discography finally being available on iTunes is nice and all, but to me it’s not really front page news. Or at least, it’s not technology news.

I could blame the iTunes-Beatles frenzy on our apparent fixation with all things entertainment. Or even on our fixation with Apple (more on that in a minute). But I actually think there are a few more interesting things going on.

 

All things Apple

Remember in July, when the iPhone 4 antennagate became a big enough issue that Apple decided to do something about it? Apple sent an invite out to journalists to a press conference – business as usual. 

But the press reported on the invite in breathless terms.

Techcrunch, for example, practically hyperventilated in its desire to get the news out even before it got the press conference invite: “Word is breaking that Apple is calling a special press conference on this coming Friday.”

Oh dear. iPhone is the best-selling handset in the US, and this is an issue that would undoubtedly affect lots of people. The press conference is newsworthy, but the invite? The only reason it is newsworthy is in that it gives readers of Techcrunch advance warning to look out for a story about the solution. 

Everything Apple does is snapped up by the media. Apple was completely justified, on that basis, among others, for making a big deal out of The Beatles.  Biggest company in the world now sells biggest band ever! 

 

Size matters

Apple became the largest technology company in the world this year thanks to its triple threat of  iTunes, Mac and iPhone. Mac sales are on the rise, the iPod and iTunes made Apple the owner of the largest music store in the world some time ago, and the iPhone is massive. 

But I get the feeling that Apple hasn’t adjusted to its meteoric rise to top dog status.

Apple still acts as though it’s the niche product, the underdog – the outsider. And that increasingly comes into conflict with its certifiable giant status as a company.

Apple banning Flash wouldn’t be a big deal if it was still a tiny fish in a big pond. Apple’s iPhone 4 antennagate issues would be far less tragicomic if it was speaking to a few iconoclasts, rather than the hoi polloi. Apple announcing that it will have a special press conference would sink into obscurity were it not for the obsessive focus on everything Apple does. Apple has grown, but it hasn’t changed its approach to customers or to the media. 

 

Warning: I know I’m generalising here! Bear with me!

Psychologists tell us that iconoclasts tend to be optimistic and calculate risk but commit to a given path. Traditional Apple users reflect this kind of behaviour – minimising any problems that their systems have (have you seen our previous years' Best Tech survey results?); seeing them as excellent regardless; weighing up the ambiguities and committing to a product. 

Buyers in the mainstream realm are, according to psychologists, more pragmatic. Any problems are amplified by passing on word of mouth complaint, and committing to a brand or product takes longer.

To my mind, some buyers almost seem to turn themselves into iconoclasts by dint of having purchased their first Apple product. Apple sells the image, and they buy it.

But if Apple is used to the first kind of customer, and as a result treat the second type - the mainstream buyers - as though they will minimise problems and commit anyway, it runs the risk of wildly misjudging consumer sentiment. If not right now, then at some point very soon.

In a similar way, Apple's relationship with the media is heading for a fall. Apple's media approach is opaque – Apple doesn’t open itself up to journalists readily, except in very scripted sound bites. While that adds a nice air of mystery for a small company trying to stay relevant, it looks like arrogance from a company the size Apple is now.

Announcing The Beatles on iTunes feeds into this perception. Apple's front page pre-announcement "Tomorrow is just another day. That you'll never forget." has a sense of the grandiose that is vital to a small company, but looks like overkill for a large corporation.

Apple is, again, entirely justified in announcing its Beatles releases, but the media frenzy – while fine in and of itself – enhances the perception of arrogance that I think Apple will have an increasingly hard time managing.

With Apple's hands-off approach to media, and the media’s love of reporting everything it does, it either needs to find some way to downplay its lesser press releases, or face a massive backlash – heck, you can probably consider this article part of it.

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  apple  |  iconoclast  |  mainstream  |  backlash
 
 
Comments: 13
cootified
18 November 2010
I think you mis-understood a lot of things written in this article.

For one, a niche product is the opposite of mass market - it means not everyone has access to it based on their affordability and location.

Two, Apple receives a lot of hype because there is nothing else out there. Period.
You don't see people lining up at stores when the Windows Phone 7 came out or do you see HTC rushing to open a flagship store.
If you employed to report, what do you do?




Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Opinion: Has Apple lost the plot??
Music store releases music, prompts worldwide gasps of awe. Has the media lost perspective, or has Apple?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
Zara_Baxter
18 November 2010
Hi Cootified,

Thanks for your thoughts.

I'm saying that Apple used to be niche, but is no longer, and hasn't gotten used to that.

People did line up for Windows Phone 7 phones. Having said that, I agree with you to a degree - what Apple does well, it does incredibly well. The iPad is, to date, the only real tablet PC - in my opinion. The iPhone is a consummate consumer phone. That doesn't mean that Apple does everything right - I'm giving my thoughts on how Apple can manage the transition from small company to big company better.

You'll find more of my thoughts on Apple on the Mac vs PC article (I'm the Apple user and laptop tester for that feature), among other places.
rubaiyat
18 November 2010
Zara

Apple has never been a small company. Even its darkest days it had multi-billions in the bank. It is just that now it is a much, much bigger company.

If you want to do a well researched article on Apple's less than stellar efforts, I'd happily point you at a good long list.

You can start with their mice, just how they manage to consistently make such sucky pointer devices astonishes me.

The latest iLife '11 is a right load of anal turpitude as well.

I'd love to totally go against the tide and point out just how much of OSX's User Interface breaks Apple's own guidelines. It is one of the great puzzles why when Apple made its system so much harder to use, everybody started swooning over it. Something to do with people not understanding brilliant simplicity, they demand arcane complexity or feel short changed.

rubaiyat
18 November 2010
Just read the article.

Do you understand the meaning of the word "iconoclast"?

You seem to think it has the opposite meaning to those who wish to burn venerated images. ie skeptics and unbelievers
oztabletpc
18 November 2010
"The iPad is, to date, the only real tablet PC - in my opinion." Wow Zara. For the editor of a PC mag that is pretty amazing call, even if it is just your opinion.

I would say best cheap as chips tablet pc, best toy tablet pc, best gaming platform, best itunes fish hook... but seriously "Real" tablet PC. Perhaps you, like most tech journalists haven't used a real tablet pc since 2002. Or may be you're drinking the Apple/Gartner Kool-Aid too.

The kids are on the couch playing games with my iPad (what it's good for, since don't enjoy posing in the Qantas Club lounge), meanwhile I'm getting things done with a real tablet pc.
firewuff
18 November 2010
Has Apple lost the plot? lets look at the evidence

a) Flash is not supported on the platform to the point that it doesn't even ship on the new macbook Airs and when you get the missing plugin message you need to manually install it

b) Apple has dropped support for Java.... yes Java. After insisting on it's own JVM for years which was ALWAYS a full version behind and spruiked the current java version as a "new feature" in 10.6 said Sun can develop it for 10.7 if they want.

c) Completely dropped the Xserve and Promise Raids. The replacement is a 12RU Mac pro with no redundant power supplies or a Mac Mini.... right I'll get my systems group to put that in a server room. This is going to kill off things like Final Cut server and Podcast Producer which produce a lot of the content flowing to iPads and iPhones.

d) There are substantial rumors of 10.7 having an app store and application model closer to the iPad.

e) Apple still claims to be "The most secure platform" despite the last 10.6 update patching over 100 flaws and OSX 10.6 having 4 time more disclosed exploitable flaws than Win 7 in the first 12 month.

With the increasingly close nature of Apple products I wont be surprised to see the platform refuse to run unsigned apps shortly..

Lost the plot? YES.
DJ...
18 November 2010
Everyone seems to be missing the significance of Apple announcing that the Beatles albums are now available on iTunes. 'They' said this would NEVER happen. Apple Music, producers of Beatles albums, have for decades tried to sue Apple Computers (now Apple Inc) for 'stealing' the Apple name. There has always been a beef between these two companies. Now Apple Inc is the largest music store in the World and now THEY have the Beatles in store.. That's NEWS, given the history of Apple Music.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
19 November 2010
DJ... wrote:
Everyone seems to be missing the significance of Apple announcing that the Beatles albums are now available on iTunes. 'They' said this would NEVER happen. Apple Music, producers of Beatles albums, have for decades tried to sue Apple Computers (now Apple Inc) for 'stealing' the Apple name. There has always been a beef between these two companies. Now Apple Inc is the largest music store in the World and now THEY have the Beatles in store.. That's NEWS, given the history of Apple Music.

It's not news, it's was a stupid in-house fight that deserves little attention. If anything, what should be news is how they're trying to flog off lossy copies for more than the CD equivalent!
rubaiyat
19 November 2010
DJ... wrote:
Everyone seems to be missing the significance of Apple announcing that the Beatles albums are now available on iTunes. 'They' said this would NEVER happen. Apple Music, producers of Beatles albums, have for decades tried to sue Apple Computers (now Apple Inc) for 'stealing' the Apple name. There has always been a beef between these two companies. Now Apple Inc is the largest music store in the World and now THEY have the Beatles in store.. That's NEWS, given the history of Apple Music.


They did steal the name. 3 times!

It has always amazed me how they won these lawsuits but never could pin Microsoft.

But then the Beatles could never manipulate the USA government.
dr_nic
19 November 2010
Congrats Zara - it appears you're both pro- and anti-Apple in the same article... according to the comments at least.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
19 November 2010
Yeah, she's really biased! I mean, catering for two extremes by being objective is highly subjective. Or something!
rubaiyat
20 November 2010
More likely just confused.

I am left in the dark by exactly what she meant by iconoclastic users. Does she mean they are blind followers or sceptical independent thinkers.

Anybody's guess.

Also the notion of Apple being a small company! Which only ever existed in Zara's mind share.

I guess they had to be small to originally fit into the proverbial garage, but then that didn't last long. Steve Jobs very quickly got large amounts of venture capital and Apple was the personal computer company from almost inception. Others eventually out grew it when the PC became the established form of personal computer, but even then Apple was only relatively smaller, it was not a small company and continued to grow nearly all its life.

Edited by rubaiyat: 20/11/2010 07:27:54 AM
dawdragon
23 November 2010
Let’s all be honest with ourselves and get back to basics … Apple and Microsoft are newsworthy. Everybody has a view on the pair and the level of polarization triggers emotive stories that help market their products. One employs a “technical” sell the other a “simplicity” sell. Both have a place. Both will always have a range of good and poor stories.

It is the way that these organization compete that makes them newsworthy ... every man (and his dog) wants the scraps that fall on the floor. In this case the scraps are feeding the magazine industry. Enjoy it for all its worth!
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1761

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads