HDMI and its stupid labelling requirements

HDMI and its stupid labelling requirements

HDMI cabling is already an area in which confusion drives people to spend more than they need to. But official naming guidelines which ban version numbering make things even more messy

In many ways HDMI has revolutionized the way we connect devices. By unifying video and audio into a single cable manufacturers have been able to make their products easier to setup than ever before. Until recently there hasn't actually been much difference in HDMI cables. Price and packaging are definitely factors in deciding between different products, but this is changing with the introduction of HDMI 1.4.

Although by the 1st of January 2012 manufacturers of products with HDMI ports won't actually be able to call HDMI 1.4 by its real name. In fact, come November 18 this year those selling cables won't be able to use HDMI 1.4 or HDMI 1.3 to delineate between different products. Instead cables that support version 1.4 of the HDMI standard will have to use one of five different labels.

The specifics are outlined in a 38 page document on the HDMI website. At the most basic level cables are split into 'Standard' and 'High Speed' versions. Standard cables are tested to support video up to 720p/1080i. High Speed cables on the other hand are tested to 1080p resolution. Within these categories come the inevitable subcategories. Standard is split three ways into Standard HDMI Cable, Standard HDMI Cable with Ethernet and Standard Automotive HDMI cable. High Speed Cables come in two versions - High Speed HDMI Cable and High Speed HDMI Cable with Ethernet.

Not only do the regulations cover the actual naming of cables, they also quite specifically state what can and can't be used to describe supported features. For example, High Speed HDMI cables support resolutions up to cinema-quality, known as 4K. Products can only be labeled with the term 4K if they support a resolution above the standard 4K. Despite the fact that 4K x 2K is used in engineering (and the resolution supported by Youtube) and technical documents it cannot be used on HDMI related packaging. So we wonder whether this Panasonic cable from our labs, which sports 4K2K on the box is violating the agreement?

xxxx
This cable from Panasonic complies with the labelling guidelines, except it uses the term 4k2k instead of the sanctioned 4k.

Because HDMI is a proprietary technology that can only be used under license, these terms are going to become more and more common. One of the primary benefits of HDMI was the reduction in cable complexity, but this system just makes things confusing. Ultimately the aim of these guidelines are to make things easier for the consumer, but it will also cause a new level of confusion.

Take this Belkin Standard Speed cable for example. Despite the fact that the HDMI website outlines that Standard Speed is capable of 720p/1080i Belkin's cable says 1080P on the front (the reality is that all the HDMI cables we have encountered, even the ones that cost $10 and come in a Ziploc bag, support 1080P). 

Not only that, the high speed cable is labelled as perfect for high definition games consoles. This is in spite of the fact that the Xbox 360 and PS3 have been out for nearly five and four years respectively, well before the High Speed HDMI specification came into effect.

 

click to view full size image
Belkin is also complying with the labelling recommendations, although if it is capable of 1080P the standard cable should work fine with game consoles and (non-3D) Blu-Ray players.

Ultimately we will all have to learn to live with this overtly complex naming scheme. In reality it not only causes confusion, it also makes things tough to write about. The vernacular when talking with technology companies and engineers revolves around HDMI 1.3 and 1.4 but from a marketing perspective these terms cannot be used. Add to this the fact that the HDMI organisation keeps the specifics of its specifications secret and translation between version numbering and marketing speak is nigh on impossible.  

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  hdmi  |  cabling  |  14
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

In Pictures: Corning's NBN cable manufacturing facility 

In Pictures: Corning's NBN cable manufacturing facility

 
Steve Wozniak slams Aussie tech prices 

Steve Wozniak slams Aussie tech prices

 
Sony World Photography Awards 2012: Nature, Wildlife and the Environment 

Sony World Photography Awards 2012: Nature, Wildlife and the Environment

 
Opinion: the Samsung Galaxy S3 is what the iPhone 4S should have been 

Opinion: the Samsung Galaxy S3 is what the iPhone 4S should have been

 
Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III 

Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III

 
Comments: 5
davo77
29 July 2010
Now up to 70% of Australians now do not have a recording device in their homes (oztam poll) due to the complexity of modern recording devices. How is this going to make the take up rate of HD devices better, sheer madness!


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
HDMI and its stupid labelling requirements?
HDMI cabling is already an area in which confusion drives people to spend more than they need to. But official naming guidelines which ban version numbering make things even more messy

What do you think? Join the discussion.
petergaskin
29 July 2010
Still have one vcr, one hd ana logue/dvd recorder and windows media centre. Thats 3 seperate recording devices.
The real problem is the price of getting a modern recording system.
Then as I need to be able to watch the proghram in 2 different rooms, then I am stuffed. The same problem exists with modern recording devices.
The cheap vcr had far more going for it than we wish to admit.
At the moment my long term solution is either 2 tivos, one for each room plus netwoerking dongles, or 2 telstra t-boxes - unable to find out how it would work, or trying to find 2 reasonable quality set top boxes that allow me to record onto external hard drives.
I will put up with my current solutions for the next 3 years - until all broadcasts are in digital only, then I have to swallow hard and pay big cash.
2 vcrs = $450, 2 tivos = $1400 + dongles or 2 telstra t-boxes -if I can get them to do what I want. Still looking for decent set top boxes that will actually record hd and sd digital.
Confusion reigns supreme! - it has nothing to do with hdmis!
Dinks-c
30 July 2010
Really what is so difficult about using optical cable to the amplifier and DVI to the TV. For those that don't wish to use an amplifier, given that the speakers in most TV's are well.....ok, then just use RCA to connect the set top box of their choice to the TV.

My friends and I that have various large format TV's all use variations of this in their home setups, and are perfectly happy. Some that have added new gear and then tried HMDI have preferred and switched back to the DVI/optical choice as it gives them flexibility saved them enough money they could afford a couple of new Blu-Ray movies.
photohounds
6 July 2011
Cables and phone chargers - a rip-off Recipe:

. Get something that costs a dollar or so to make
. Put it in a fancy packet emblazoned with buzzwords
. Mark it up between 500% and 10000%

The consumer gets little (nothing?) for their outlay. I too, use DVI thanks very much.
I get to keep much of my hard-earned and my rights to use my equipment as I see fit as well..
vidtek
28 March 2012
Photohounds is spot on here. I don't agree with some of his posts, but he is correct here.
DVI will give as good a result to the average punter as HDMI without the aggro of all the hoops HDMI puts consumers through. I've been a TV Engineer for 45 years and as long as the average joe can see a picture that's vaguely acceptable he'll be happy with his biggest loser or other numpty pleb shows.
The main problems I now encounter are digital vs analogue, at least with analogue if you get a signal drop-out you'll still be able to watch the end of the show albeit a bit snowy. With digital you have no chance, once the threshold drops below a certain level, that's it chum. With analogue, you switch a fluro on and you get the odd sparkly, with digital and low signal conditions the same interference wipes out your picture often with a sudden squawk that hurts the eardrums.
Tony
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads