Real world testing: How do generic headphones sound compared to Apple and bigger brands?

Real world testing: How do generic headphones sound compared to Apple and bigger brands?

There's a thriving market in third-party headphones intended to replace those that come with portable players. But will you hear a significant difference if you invest?

To find out which headphones were rated to have the best quality, we played our judges the same selection of clips used in the previous test, but now invited them to listen with four different pairs of headphones and rate the quality once again. For a fair comparison, we used the same player throughout this test - the Cowon iAudio S9, a device with a relatively neutral tone.

The headphones we used included those that came with our cheap generic player and the familiar white earbuds that accompany the iPod nano.

We also invited our judges to try a pair of Sony MDR-EX300 in-ear headphones, available online for around $65, and a top-end Sennheiser IE8 pair, with an eye-watering retail price of around $550.

The judges weren't given any information about the headphones, and tested them in random order.

click to view full size image
                                            Click on image for larger size

The results

Almost every listener found the cheap generic headphones unsatisfactory. Time and again we heard words such as "weak" and "tinny", and 18 out of our 20 judges felt they were either the worst or second worst of the bunch.

The iPod headphones received a more ambivalent reception: a few judges hated their sound, but most found it merely average.
The third-party headphones were much more enthusiastically received.

The Sony and Sennheiser models polled near-identical scores overall, each taking top marks from 11 judges (including four first-place ties).

The Sony headphones were generally agreed to give a "loud, powerful sound", and many people also praised their ability to exclude external noise, thanks to a design that penetrates deeply into the ear canal.

The $550 Sennheiser units created a more refined impression: our judges described their tone in terms such as "rich" and "pure", with one commenting that they were the only pair that didn't sound like they were "struggling" with the detail in the music.

click to view full size image
                                Headphones rated: click on image for larger size

Conclusions

People may disagree over media players, but it seems that almost everyone can appreciate the difference between bog-standard in-box headphones and decent third-party replacements. That applies most obviously to the generic headphones, but even pricey high-end players often come with mediocre headphones.

The good news is that you don't need to spend the earth to upgrade. The Sennheisers may take the audiophile crown, but our respondents' scores indicate that they'd be just as happy with the pumping Sony units costing one sixth of the price.

See more about:  headphones  |  sound  |  mp3  |  music  |  apple  |  sony  |  generic  |  sennheiser
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Is 5G WiFi the most confusing term of 2012? 

Is 5G WiFi the most confusing term of 2012?

 
Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III 

Aussies last in line for Galaxy S III

 
Review: Kobo Touch 

Review: Kobo Touch

 
Samsung: Apple ripped off 2001: A Space Odyssey 

Samsung: Apple ripped off 2001: A Space Odyssey

 
Tech deals: Harvey Norman to offload HP TouchPads for $98 

Tech deals: Harvey Norman to offload HP TouchPads for $98

 
Comments: 3
PaytonLiu
18 March 2010
Yeah, definately 3rd parties are way better than those come with the player. My most favourite brand is Sennheiser, then Sony (got its Hi-Fi one).

Those default earphones or headphones really downgrade your player's performance, I rarely see players that come with good ones.


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Real world testing: How do generic headphones sound compared to Apple and bigger brands??
There's a thriving market in third-party headphones intended to replace those that come with portable players. But will you hear a significant difference if you invest?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
18 March 2010
Neither Sony, Sennheiser or Apple make 'high end' headphones. Ultimate Ears, Etymotic, HiFiMan and Vsonic are where the quality lies. Sennheiser and Sony are ok (but expensive for what they offer). Apple's not much better than generic.
whitlocm
22 June 2011
On the money there Cyb3rGlitch. Laughed when the title of the story was "How do generic headphones sound compared to Apple and bigger brands?". Yer those $5 generic headphones painted white and branded Apple don't have anything to offer a discerning consumer. Maybe harsh on the Senn's (own the HD650's), but totally agree otherwise. Simple rule, but seems too complicated for the human species a) do research, b) listen for yourself, & c) don't just buy something cause every other idiot does.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1759

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads