The DoJ said in a brief published late last week that the decision against Jammie Thomas-Rasset was not excessive, and should serve as an example to deter others from downloading music illegally.
"The federal copyright statute, enacted by the First Congress and subject to numerous revisions since that time, has consistently authorised the awarding of statutory damages to ensure significant monetary awards in copyright infringement lawsuits that will make copyright owners whole and deter further infringement," wrote the DoJ.
"This historical approach is followed in the current version of the Copyright Act's statutory damages provision: it provides compensation to copyright owners who have to invest resources into protecting property that is often unquantifiable in value, and deters those infringing parties who think they will go undetected in committing this serious public wrong."
The DoJ filing was part of the ongoing battle between Thomas-Rasset and Capital Records. Thomas-Rasset was fined $224,000 in 2007 for downloading and sharing 12 song files on Kazaa. Following an appeal, a new jury awarded the US$1.92m decision. A new appeal is underway.
The filing will disappoint those who were expecting the DoJ to be more sympathetic to consumers and downloaders under the Obama administration, which has shown promise for copyright reform with moves such as opening web sites under the Creative Commons licence.
The White House sided more recently with copyright holders, however.