search technology reviews, news, features, group tests
Popular Searches:   video , dvd , dell
 |  Register
 |  Newsletters  | 
Sitemap  |  RSS
RSS
Sunday November 22, 2009 8:10 PM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Stepping up to a DSLR camera, part 1: The megapixel myth
Stepping up to a DSLR camera, part 1: The megapixel myth
NEWS

Stepping up to a DSLR camera, part 1: The megapixel myth

by William Maher  on Aug 11, 2009
Tags: dslr | camera
More pixels doesn't necessarily mean better image quality.To better understand why some cameras take better pictures than others, you need to look at the image sensor itself.

In the latest issue of PC Authority, on sale now at your local newsagency, is a complete guide to understanding camera technologies, including the following advice about a common marketing tool - megapixels:

One of the biggest benefits, and often misunderstood, aspects of upgrading from a cheap point and shoot digital camera is better image quality.

If you want to take the sort of photos you see in photo competitions, or that are good enough for a wedding album or to blow up and hang on your wall, then a DSLR or some of the other better quality cameras available will help you achieve things that are more difficult using a compact.

With many cameras offering at least 12MP, most people have more than enough resolution (unless you're shooting professionally) - the game has moved on.

Megapixel-count determines resolution, but it tells you nothing about the quality of the resolution. More megapixels means the picture can be viewed or printed with greater detail at larger sizes. It won't tell you anything about the exposure, sharpness, colours, and introduction of noise.

More important is the size of the sensor and something called "pixel pitch". Cramming more megapixels into a smaller sensor means smaller pixels and the sensor won't be as sensitive at low light levels. Increase the sizes of the sensor, the theory goes, and you provide more room for larger photoreceptive pixels, which translates into more light sensitivity and less noise when shooting at higher ISOs.

Canon EOS 1000D: The image sensor on even a budget DSLRlike this is much larger ( 22.2 x 14.8 mm) than most powerzoom fixed lens cameras - like the similarly-priced Canon PowerShot SX1 IS (1/2.3 inch)


A DSLR like the Canon EOS 1000D and a power zoom like the Canon PowerShot SX1 IS mightn't be drastically different in size or price, but inside the 1000D is a bigger APS-C sensor compared with the 1 / 2.3in sensor in the SX 1. This mightn't necessarily matter when shooting in sunny daylight, but when you go indoors, the light sensitivity and ISO capabilities of the DSLR will open up more creative options.

There is a trick used to combat noise on cameras with smaller sensors. It's called noise reduction, but the tradeoff is reduced image detail, which can be noticeable as smearing or blurring of the image. Keep this in mind when you see sub-$500 cameras with settings as high as ISO 3200.

Also see our Group Test of 11 Digital SLR Cameras

 

Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

Box battle: Telstra takes on TiVo and Foxtel with T-Box trial in Melbourne
It's not quite Foxtel IQ and it's isn't TiVo either. The T-Box lets Telstra users watch movies and TV from the Bigpond site, as well as record and watch digital TV
 
5 More Free Linux Apps You Can't Do Without
More digital Swiss Army knife software, including Linux utilities and tools that are so useful you won't know how you ever did without them
 
Microsoft delivers Office 2010 public beta
Vendor details editions for Office 2010 along with application virtualisation for testing.
 


 
Intel
 
 
LogMeIn
 
 
Amazing Dell Coupons now available
 
Discover Apple