search technology reviews, news, features, group tests
Popular Searches:   windows , asus ,
 |  Register
 |  Newsletters  | 
Sitemap  |  RSS
RSS
Sunday November 8, 2009 8:09 PM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Intel pro-tip: replace PCs within 3 years to keep costs down
Intel pro-tip: replace PCs within 3 years to keep costs down
NEWS

Intel pro-tip: replace PCs within 3 years to keep costs down

by Zara Baxter  on Jun 26, 2009
Tags: intel | business
"What a load of crock! The business I work for has computers up to 21 years old. Our network software barely copes with XP and would collapse with Vista - totally. What about the increased costs of ..."
 
Although many SMBs are facing incredibly tough times, a new study suggests that waiting to refresh your PC fleet will cost you more money than it saves

With small and medium businesses facing difficult times, and wanting to save money wherever possible, many businesses have been hanging onto old PCs rather replacing them.

The large cost of a new PC can be a daunting expenditure when cash flow is lower than usual. Some 43% of medium businesses and 26% of small businesses say that waiting longer before replacing a PC is one of the strategies they are using to keep costs down during the economic downturn.

But a study from Techaisle shows that small to medium businesses trying to extend PC lives beyond 3 years face more virus attacks and system failures as well as higher maintenance costs.

The study shows that computers more than three years old have 28-58% more virus incidents per year than computers that are less than three years old.

As well as more incidents, there's an onflow effect for productivity as computer downtime to deal with the viruses increases. Techaisle's study shows that notebooks over three years old have 22% more downtime, while older desktops have 23% more downtime than newer systems as a result of virus infections.

But viruses aren't the only problem that older computers suffer from. Older PCs also face more system failures.

"Pushing past warranty period [older systems] are more likely to see power supply failures, networking failures, hard drive failures, and have to deal with the consequences of the downtime from that," said Robert Crooke, VP for Intel's Business Client Group.

Some 49% of SMB see power supply failure on systems older than three years, for example, and 33% experience a hard drive failure on an older system.

Older systems also have increased maintenance costs, averaging $545 per computer per year for small businesses and $709 for medium businesses. That's compared to a cost in the first year of $126.

These increased costs, together with the additional downtime, mean that upgrading within three years can keep overall spend down. New systems often cost only slightly more than a single year's maintenance cost and expenditure can be recouped quickly.

"Buying a new PC improves security and reduces maintenance costs, provides a better user experience and they can pay that back within a year," Crooke said.

Techaisle's study suggests that businesses will see 23% reductions in downtime for a new PC compared to systems over three years.

"If you are looking to save money in the downturn and emerge stronger, you're better off replacing within 3 years," Said Crooke.

Gigabyte and Asus have both announced new motherboards that deliver specific benefits to SMB's, including VPro technology, Intel's IT Director dashboard software - which ensures that antivirus and firewall software is running as well as monitoring PCs for problems - and energy saving technology.

 

Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments: 2
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Eromanga
Jun 29, 2009 4:07 PM
I really need it explained to me that if you have two PCs with the same upadated anti virus software installed on them why the one which is older will suffer more.


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Intel pro-tip: replace PCs within 3 years to keep costs down?
Although many SMBs are facing incredibly tough times, a new study suggests that waiting to refresh your PC fleet will cost you more money than it saves

What do you think? Join the discussion.
petergaskin
Jun 29, 2009 7:58 PM
What a load of crock! The business I work for has computers up to 21 years old. Our network software barely copes with XP and would collapse with Vista - totally. What about the increased costs of training every time you introduce a new system. What about the costs of changing your network system to ensure compatibility.
A home computer will generally last 4 years+, so why shouldn't a business pc last at least 4 years.
Where I worked, our new server broke down after only 4 weeks - it required an all day Sunday to get the new server back up and running. A pc thats only 4 weeks old is just as likely to break down as a 4 year old pc.
each business must compare the cost of upgrading - and new software - ms office is very expensive to replace every 3 years - with the expected maintenance costs of retaining your pc for another year.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

New York launches antitrust investigation into Intel
The New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo has announced it is launching an anti-trust investigation into Intel after allegations that the chip giant abused its market position.
 
5 More Free PC Apps You Can't Do Without
More digital Swiss Army knife software, including utilities and tools that are so useful you won't know how you ever did without them
 
Movie tech: The science behind the film 2012
The Mayan prophecy might be counting down, but the science behind the new film 2012 might leave a few people confused. We look at what the film got right and what is best left to conspiracy theorists.
 


 
LogMeIn
 
 
HP
 
 
Amazing Dell Coupons now available