search technology reviews, news, features, group tests
Popular Searches:   video , dell , dvd
 |  Register
 |  Newsletters  | 
Sitemap  |  RSS
RSS
Tuesday November 24, 2009 2:14 AM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Top 10 technologies that burnt early adopters
Top 10 technologies that burnt early adopters
«
NEWS

Top 10 technologies that burnt early adopters

by Daniel Long  on May 1, 2009
Tags: hddvd | bluray | winme | sinclair | umd | psp | atari | zip | apple | mac | ibm | pcjr | c64 | gizmondo
"http://www.tarjeta-r4-ds.es Nintendo R4"
 

The top 5 early adopter products that fizzled:


5)   Atari Jaguar


click to view full size imageReleased:

1993

Promoted as:

Five processors, 3 chips and 64 bits of gaming power. How could it go possibly go wrong? Released around the same time as the Sega Genesis (Megadrive) and SNES, Atari had put $3million into marketing the Jaguar, thereby banking everything on its success.

What actually happened:

Put simply, the Jaguar was the console that sunk Atari. Sensing an opportunity in the market, Atari cancelled their 32bit 'Panther ' and pushed ahead with releasing the Jaguar to stores in 1993. Thanks to a number of well documented hardware bugs, including problems with the system's memory controller, very few games were actually released; but mainly because nobody bought the damn thing and because game developers weren't going to risk going belly-up with a non-rating console.

Atari CEO Samuel Trammel famously admitted that the Sony Playstation was more powerful than the Jaguar, one of those special CEO moments reserved for the Darwin awards. Even the 64bit system, which the Jaguar supposedly ran on, was accused by critics for being misleading. It technically ran on two separate 32bit chips - each running parallel.  

Atari almost released a VR headset in a last ditch effort to save face, but it was too late - the company was effectively pronounced dead in the water because of plummeting sales. In 1995, the Sony Playstation was released, effectively killing off any last hopes of an Atari revival.   

click to view full size image
Is this the worst controller ever?
In 1996, the Jaguar was done for and so was Atari; they were taken over by hard drive manufacturer, JD Storage the same year.

How early adopters got burnt:

Ouch. If you had paid $250 for a fifth generation console and it only played a handful of mediocre games, you'd of wished you had followed the kid next door's advice and purchased a Sega or a Super Nintendo. 

Matters weren't made any better by a complex 15 button controller that had game players envying the simplicity of the Super NES gamepad. When the PSP rolled around, it was an entire game changer and the Jaguar was a distant memory for gamers.


The entire brand was laid to rest just 3 years after the console release, making this a spectacular miss and a real waste of money for the people who rushed out to buy one in the early days of 93.

click to view full size imageSuccessor:

Sony Playstation. Need we say more?

Runner-up:

Nintendo Virtual Boy. Arguably a bigger flop than the Jaguar, Nintendo were lucky that this epic failure didn't plunge them into bankruptcy.  Only 14 games were ever produced and the VR headset  encouraged motion sickness and eyestrain.

And, because of a shortage of decent priced blue and red LEDs in the mid 90s, the games were strictly red and black. Could you imagine anything worse? Strangely enough, nobody cares about virtual reality 14 years later. Not surprising really.


4) Gizmondo


Released:

2005

Promoted as:

A 'revolutionary' handheld gaming device featuring GPS technology, Nvidia 3D graphics, Bluetooth, SMS and JPG camera.

What actually happened:

The events surrounding Gizmondo would make for a very entertaining film. The rise and fall this company is spectacular:  convicted drug trafficker Gizmondo executive Stefan Eriksson became known famously for smashing rare, expensive Ferraris and courting exotic supermodels.

Ericksson's criminal ties and involvement in the company overshadowed the poorly received handset that critics panned upon release. Poorly marketed, hardly advertised and with dwindling sales, manufacturer Tiger Telematics were forced into receivership after just one year of release.

click to view full size image
All the attractive ladies in the world wasn't going to help this failed handheld
How early adopters got burnt:

We have to admit that back in 2005, the lure of GPS, Bluetooth and 3D graphics on a handheld sounded pretty sweet. But for customers who paid the $400 asking price, many of them would of been pretty annoyed to learn that the device would only ever play a total of 8 (yes, 8!) games.

Succeeded by:

Gizmondo 2.  No we're not kidding - they're still trying to release a sequel to the world's worst selling handheld.  After missing its 2008 release schedule, the device is now aiming for 2009, but we doubt this will pull a phoenix and rise from the ashes.



click to view full size imageRunner up:
 

Gameboy Micro. The inability to play original GameBoy games (and Gameboy colour catridges) on the GB Micro made this a big no-no in Donkey Kong land and a handheld fizzler for Nintendo.


3)    IBM PCjr

Released:

1984

Promoted as:

IBM's 'Green Dragon' (as it was internally known) came in two distinct models, a US$699, 64k model and a more expensive US$1299 model packed with 128K of RAM. It also featured a speedy 4.77Mhz 8088 Intel CPU.  Ahh, those were the days.

What actually happened:

A massive failure, that's what.  Compatibility issues with IBM PC software titles rocked the PCjr, a function it was supposed to serve without question.  Due to memory problems, and non-standard expansion ports, the IBM branded PC shared little relation to other IBM computers : most customers bought the PCjr under this proviso and were ultimately mislead.

How early adopters got burnt:

Picture this: You just paid US$1299 for a computer that had very few software titles and was severely hampered by a cheap looking 64 key chiclet keyboard that made normal typing almost impossible.

click to view full size imageTo make matters even crazier, the keyboard was controlled by an old school wireless protocol (line of sight), so it would only work under optimum circumstances.  Useless expansion ports made life equally tough. But it could have been worse; you might of purchased the Apple III the same year and wasted another US$7000 on a another stinker.

Succeeded by:

IBM PS/1 in 1990.  Although, it can be argued that the popularity of the Commodore 64 dealt the real death blow to the IBM jr in the mid 1980's.  

click to view full size imageRunner up:

NeXT computer.  After Steve Jobs left Apple in 1985, he created the NeXT computer with a goal to make it his new baby.  With over US$250 million in development costs, the expensive UNIX powered machine (US$6000) failed to work with any software titles and was a huge financial disaster for the short lived company - although Tim Berners- Lee somehow managed to design the World Wide Web using it.

 


2)   Sinclair C5 electric vehicle


click to view full size imageReleased:

1985

Promoted as:

A sexy alternative to petrol guzzlers.  Inventor-genius Clive Sinclair had already achieved a level of success with the pocket calculator and digital watch (not to mention his early pioneering work in the computer business with the Sinclair PC).

With the C5, Sinclair envisioned a utopian people mover that required few age limits (over 14), no licence or registration to drive. Best of all, it was electric and operated by a simple push button starter.  This was the future of driving according to this famous ad.

What actually happened:

Due to its unusual size and design profile, the C5 was derided and made fun of, becoming a financial disaster for its inventor. The company quickly went bankrupt less than 10 months after its launch in 1985. 

More so, the roofless pod design of the C5 made it a poor choice for regular use in the UK, famous for its inclement weather.  Cold weather severely undercut the battery life, long hills hurt the motor and because of the C5's low size - traffic visibility was determined to be a constant threat. 

Urban legends hounded the design of the motor; many believed it was made from a washing machine motor, because of its association with Italian manufacturer, Polymotor.

How early adopters got burnt:

Apart from the listed design and motor faults, we imagine that regular service and spare parts would have been a little tricky to access when the company was as good as dead in the same year it was launched. Less than 17000 were ultimately sold, before the plug was pulled.

Succeeded by:

The EV1 (by General Motors). That electric vehicle didn't get too far either, come to think of it.

click to view full size imageRunner -up:

DeLorean DMC -12. We're proud as punch to drop a Back to the Future reference in our feature, but just a little misty-eyed to see this work of automobile art relegated to a footnote in scrap heap history. 

After being cleared of federal drug trafficking by the FBI, founder John DeLorean eventually saw his Northern Ireland based business sucked into a financial black hole.  Less than 9000 were ever produced.

The only way to get one today is through collectors and occasionally on eBay.  Although it's too bad if you dropped US$29,000 big ones back in the early 80's - we doubt the service warranty would get you far.


1)   Apple III


click to view full size imageReleased:  

1984

Promoted as:  

Apple's finest creation since the Apple II computer.

What actually happened:

The Apple III was littered with hardware bugs - namely overheating issues and crammed components.  Lacking a cooling fan, memory chips would randomly pop out and motherboards would warp.

The price of the machine was incredibly expensive and it was a total financial disaster for Apple. Over 14000 were eventually replaced by Apple.

click to view full size image
PB's offered more junk than a scrapyard
How early adopters got burnt:

Think about it: You paid almost US$8000 for a computer in 1984 (almost a year's wage for some  people then), for a machine that overheated and broke down regularly.  To make matters worse, software for the machine were strictly limited to just a few titles. This was not the sexy iPod era of Apple. This was the 'Oh my god, I can't believe I just wasted money on an Apple' era. Things were going so well for Steve Jobs and then he had to do this.... No wonder the following year in 1985; although his NeXT PC was just as badly recieved and a bigger disaster.

Succeeded by:

Apple III Plus.  We're not sure the naming of this was a good idea, considering what came before it.

Runner up:

Packard Bell PC's.   Known to have more faults than an Indian tech support line, the PB machines were famous for being seriously junky.

«
Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments: 15
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
avoidz
May 1, 2009 8:28 PM
"Clive Sinclair had already achieved a level of success with the pocket calculator and digital watch."

You forgot to mention the fact that Sir Clive Sinclair invented the home computer market and started many well-known programmers' careers in the UK with the Sinclair Spectrum 48K. Credit where credit is due.


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Top 10 technologies that burnt early adopters?
Do you remember Windows ME, the Sinclair C5, Zip disks or the Apple III? Early adopters usually pride themselves with getting the finest tech products first, but sometimes being first isn’t always best.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
DL
May 1, 2009 8:47 PM
Yes, that's very true. Thanks for the good point.
DL
May 1, 2009 8:51 PM
I should of added that; He was a pioneer of the early PC market no doubt and thats where he largely gained much of his money to fund his electric car dream.

It was sad that he never got another chance; he had a 4 person electric sedan planned as a follow-up to the C5, with 100 miles range. For 1985, that was like a time machine. After he realised the falicy of the C5's small size, he wanted to make something like a real car. Although he never found backers for it unfortunately.
succourfish
May 4, 2009 1:24 PM
Hey Daniel, thanks for the story. Very interesting. Minor points though: In the stories on the Iomega Zip Disc and the Atari Jaguar you used the word "supposably". Supposedly you meant to use the word "supposedly". Also you probably meant "derided" when you used the word "derived" in the Sinclair electric vehicle story. Otherwise excellent. Cheers.
Slatts
May 5, 2009 1:02 PM
succourfish wrote:
Hey Daniel, thanks for the story. Very interesting. Minor points though: In the stories on the Iomega Zip Disc and the Atari Jaguar you used the word "supposably". Supposedly you meant to use the word "supposedly". Also you probably meant "derided" when you used the word "derived" in the Sinclair electric vehicle story. Otherwise excellent. Cheers.


Has anyone seem where I put my pedant spray?](*,)
gnome
May 6, 2009 2:37 PM
And Pommy weather may be "incumbent", but it's usually inclement. . .
LionMage
May 19, 2009 10:29 AM
Fun article, but man, some really spotty research. Where to begin?

About the Motorola ROKR: Actually, the 100 song limit was NOT a bug, so it's misleading to chalk that up to "buggy firmware." No, sadly, this was by Apple's insistence. Product segmentation and differentiation. I should also point out that the Motorola SLVR had iTunes software, so the original ROKR wasn't the only phone from Motorola to sport iTunes. (The SLVR was released substantially later than the ROKR. It improved some of the problems with the ROKR, but it still had the 100 song limit and a horridly slow USB 1.0 interface.)

Windows ME: Actually, Windows 2000 was contemporaneous with Windows ME. Windows 2000 was a successor to Windows NT 4.x, not to Windows ME, as it was based upon NT technology (as opposed to ME, which was basically a redressed Windows 98).

UMD movies: Strangely enough, at least here in the States, there are some movies still being released in UMD format. I know, I know, everybody keeps telling us that the format is dead, dead, dead, but somehow my fiancee keeps finding new titles at the local electronics store. As in, movies released after UMD video was supposedly killed off. Some of those might be the result of contracts being gradually run out. And my fiancee would be one of those people who uses her PSP more for videos and music than for games; at least Sony lets you side-load your own video onto memory stick, so you can add your own content.

Atari Jaguar: Actually, there was one 64-bit chip in the Jaguar. The two stars on that platform were the Tom and Jerry chips. Tom was the 64-bit chip and handled graphics (and was intended to be the primary processor, which never worked in practice, because developers preferred to port code to the one chip they had a C compiler for -- the lowly 68000 processor, which Atari apparently intended as an I/O processor). I guess only 2 functional blocks of Tom were technically 64-bit (the blitter and the "object processor"). Jerry was the 32-bit chip, and was for sound processing.

Comments about NeXT: "failed to work with any software titles"? That's a stretch. While it may not have been a hugely successful platform in its day, many major software packages were available for it (including FrameMaker, several Adobe packages -- I'm pretty sure Illustrator and Photoshop were there, especially since the Display PostScript model made Illustrator an easy port). More importantly, the software development on the NeXT OS (NeXTStep, later OpenStep) was really simple and powerful, making it popular with academics and software developers. And banks. Lots of banks liked the NeXT hardware and software. MIT and Carnegie Mellon University had tons of these. Tim Berners-Lee chose to do his development under NeXT for precisely the reason that it was a great development environment. No, really. Stop acting so shocked! Besides, it's a UNIX, so pure POSIX code will port anywhere. John Carmack did all of the Quake and Doom development under NeXTStep, and much of the level design for id Software games was done on NeXT boxes until Carmack switched them away from NeXT.

Maybe "failed to work with any software titles" would make more sense if you meant titles released for other platforms, but that's expecting compatibility with other systems when you have a significantly different hardware and software architecture.

Also, the US$6000 figure is a little out of whack when you consider that many students were buying relatively affordable "pizza box" NeXT workstations for less than half that. Back in those days, that was considered an acceptable price to pay for a serious computer, and about what a student could expect to pay for a Mac or a Dell PC.

Also, you're forgetting that NeXT never died out. It was acquired by Apple, which paved the way for Steve Jobs' return, and NeXTStep, later OpenStep, became the foundation of Mac OS X by way of the Rhapsody project at Apple. (I actually tried Rhapsody on an old PowerMac 7300. It ran sluggishly, and it resembled NeXTStep more than the OS X we all know today, but that's how the ball got rolling.) This was at the time when Apple desperately needed a new OS and was shopping around after their Copland project imploded.

So I think your claims that NeXT was poorly received are kind of inaccurate, considering that Jobs got the last laugh and the technology is now in every single Mac sold today. They just needed to drop the two super-expensive technologies that made the OS so expensive to license (Display PostScript code was licensed from Adobe, and Pantone color matching was embedded in the OS).
zalpha
May 21, 2009 6:45 AM
About Windows ME:
Both timelines, the original article's and the commenter, are incorrect.

Windows 2000 was release on February 17th, 2000. ME was released on September 14th, 2000.

Official reasons why they released the two OSes back to back vary, but from a personal perspective (I was working as a professional computer tech at the time), the issue was pretty clear. Although Windows 2000 was a superior OS to 98, Microsoft's attempt to force all users into the NT kernel was an unmitigated disaster. Untold numbers of users lost critical data as the OS tried to "upgrade" the file system. Possibly billions of dollars of software were rendered unusable, as few applications purchased for 98 would run on 2000. In the end, ME was released well before it was ready to try and "save face" for Microsoft. Instead, ME took the spotlight off of the Windows 2000 fiasco, allowing Microsoft time to fix the problems while the world suffered under ME.

When Microsoft tried, once again, to migrate everyone to NT with Windows XP, they had worked the problems out (for the most part) and things went much more smoothly.
BigGingerYeti
May 21, 2009 11:57 PM
Great article! Crazy thing is, I bought my first computer in 2000, a Vaio laptop which had Me pre-installed. I never had any trouble with it!
Peter Manser
Jun 19, 2009 6:49 PM
I am surprised that Betamax video tape recorders didn't rate a mention in this article. They were at least as much of a fiasco as HD DVDs, though of course it was a bit further back in time.

And what about super-8 movie cameras? Perhaps they were outside the computer industry though.
Slatts
Jun 19, 2009 8:29 PM
Peter Manser wrote:
I am surprised that Betamax video tape recorders didn't rate a mention in this article. They were at least as much of a fiasco as HD DVDs, though of course it was a bit further back in time.

And what about super-8 movie cameras? Perhaps they were outside the computer industry though.

Betamax was technologically superior to VHS. VHS was marketed better.

Super-8 film was great in its day but died out with the advent of video cameras. In much the same way that chemical film cameras are being replaced by digital cameras.
totoaus
Jun 21, 2009 6:03 PM
I recall hearing about all of these products except for Gizmondo and Jaguar, and think they were all innovative products with good prospects.
As has been commented, the much maligned ME was released for the reasons the article stated, but as I recall: as a long sought upgrade for the home market, while the NT variants place was for business and secure applications. NT security was simply not for the home market and I used it extensively in several workplaces, but only at home to build my skills for work.
No one has commented on the ZIP disk, and forget that it was a large capacity floppy disk, in the days before USB drives, external HDDs and so on. I still have a 100 MB ZIP drive and 12 or so cartridges, although they don't get used. At the time, they were the only product allowing me to carry my data files around (many of which were to big for a floppy, when CD-RW technlogy was not available widely enough). They were more robust than 3.5 inch floppies and had enough capacity that I only needed 2 (1 each for work & personal). Yes, I had a few failures, but the beat flopies hands down, and I know of one small business that was still using the venerable 100 MB ZIP disk for backups of accounting/POS software until it closed in 2007. Zip isn't really dead, it just fills a small niche very well.
marks960
Jul 1, 2009 2:43 AM
http://www.nintendo.com
r4-nintendo.com have the best array of M3 real cards, R4 ds cards, R4 dsi cards and the NEW Acekards 2 downloads we hope you take pleasure in using this site whilst getting only the best for your DS!
marks960
Jul 1, 2009 2:46 AM
http://www.r4-card.com

r4-card.com have the hottest selection of R4 DS cards, R4 DSi cards, M3 real cards, and the NEW Acekard 2 downloads. We hope you benefit greatly from using this site whilst getting truly the easiest media enhancers you could ever imagine having for your DS console!
marks960
Jul 1, 2009 2:46 AM
http://www.tarjeta-r4-ds.es

Nintendo R4
Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

Telstra confirm 30Mbit national network plan - but don't mention the NBN
Telstra has completed the 100Mbit upgrade to their Melbourne cable network and are next planning to get 30Mbit speeds into the rest of the country; but first they'll need to dispel those endless NBN comparisons
 
Red Hat updates with Fedora 12
Red Hat has released the latest version of its Fedora open source operating system and has added new video, virtualisation and networking support..
 
Picking the perfect home entertainment box: Movie downloads come to the Xbox 360
Unmetered download agreements are next the battleground as games consoles follow the Apple TV's lead to support movie download services.
 


 
Intel
 
 
LogMeIn
 
 
Amazing Dell Coupons now available
 
Discover Apple