search technology reviews, news, features, group tests
Popular Searches:   video , dvd , dell
 |  Register
 |  Newsletters  | 
Sitemap  |  RSS
RSS
Sunday November 22, 2009 6:49 PM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Rudd's New NBN: Five upsides, five downsides
Rudd's New NBN: Five upsides, five downsides
NEWS

Rudd's New NBN: Five upsides, five downsides

by Alex Kidman  on Apr 8, 2009
Tags: NBN | broadband | Telstra | fibre | ftth
"That is also true. But I'd rather have wired than wireless, there's enough shit going through the air as it is. Not to mention latencies. We'll have to wait and see."
 
Kevin Rudd's announcement yesterday that, in effect, the winner of the NBN process was nobody was something of a jaw-dropping moment. Should broadband users be overjoyed by the NBN, or cautiously wary?

The announcement that the Government would instead invest $43 billion in a FTTH network was even more jaw dropping. But what are the real upsides, and for that matter, the downsides?

Five reasons to be optimistic:

  • 1) Promised speed increases: Up to 100Mbit, and potentially even faster again in the future.
  • 2) An open, wholesale network: Sales competition should be pretty fierce, which can only be good for customers.
  • 3) Telcos working together: Even Telstra's saying this will be a good thing -- and it'll be easier to get the NBN off the ground with Telstra than without it
  • 4) Jobs, Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: The promise of jobs -- in building, implementation and maintenance -- can only be a good thing.
  • 5) Starting this year: Tasmania this year, so it's claimed. Covering the broadband blackspots first is clever strategy.

Five reasons to be pessimistic:

  • 1) Political hurdles: Special interests. Opposition. Just plain political meddling. Anyone think that's not going to happen?
  • 2) A motza of money: $43 billion, and then similar private investment -- if it can be found.
  • 3) Eight years to complete: Eight years is a long, long time in broadband.
  • 4) Government owned: Can anyone say "mandatory filter"?
  • 5) Not Government owned: But they're also planning to sell it off after 5 years. Did failing to separate Telstra before selling it really work out?
Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments: 9
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
mordie
Apr 8, 2009 12:02 PM
Another down : new easy way to introduce Mandatory filtering / censorship on the sly....They could bypass the senate and just stick it in the build...


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Rudd's New NBN: Five upsides, five downsides?
Kevin Rudd's announcement yesterday that, in effect, the winner of the NBN process was nobody was something of a jaw-dropping moment. Should broadband users be overjoyed by the NBN, or cautiously wary?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
gnome
Apr 8, 2009 1:42 PM
Eight years to complete is not long in relation to the size of the project. The FTTP concept allows great flexibility for future scalability. And from a defence aspect, an all-fibre network is the most secure.
Faustino
Apr 9, 2009 7:23 PM
The only justification for massive government-funded infrastructure funding is that it will provide greater community benefits than any alternative use of resources, including tax cuts (the "opportunity cost"). The attempt at a $4.7bn intervention with private sector operators failed to generate a viable response. Given the rushed $43bn plan, I can't believe that any cost-benefit analysis or economic modelling was done, and if it were it would surely show very negative returns.

In the longer term, we will be paying higher interest and tax rates for years as a result of Rudd's "stimulus packages", with consequent slower growth in employment and incomes. This will be further exacerbated by the NBN, not to mention the IR changes and ETS. At a time when the government should be showing restraint, it continues to "splash-the-cash." We'll all pay for it, some might get negligible benefits from NBN, but at massive cost.

The economically-destructive Whitlam government increased the size of government by 16 per cent over two years. Rudd has increased it by more than 20 per cent in a year, even without the NBN. There's no joy for techies or anyone else in this announcement.

Note: I'm a former economic policy adviser once recruited by Kevin Rudd.
Lost-Benji
Apr 10, 2009 7:36 AM
The governemet should have never sold off Telecom (telstra) and they know it. By rolling out a wholesale only Fiber to customer system, it will allow government controlled compition that will allow way better positive compititon and eliminate the current monopoly that Telstra and Optus have on the infrastructure.

Telstra and Optus are both very greedy and have allot of short-comings.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Apr 10, 2009 12:35 PM
Lost-Benji wrote:
The governemet should have never sold off Telecom (telstra) and they know it. By rolling out a wholesale only Fiber to customer system, it will allow government controlled compition that will allow way better positive compititon and eliminate the current monopoly that Telstra and Optus have on the infrastructure.

Telstra and Optus are both very greedy and have allot of short-comings.

Too bad they're selling it off once it's done.
malai5
Apr 10, 2009 6:10 PM
Cybe, you know that what Governments say is not to be relied upon.
Who knows, "buying back the farm" might be just the ticket for re-election when the time comes.
All the "we will sell it later" rhetoric means is , we will cover our bases with those who wish to have a go at us for being spendthrifts at this time.

So, whether the New Government Broadband system is ever sold off, is in the lap of the gods.

Cheers

Malai5
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Apr 10, 2009 6:13 PM
True. It's an epic waste of money anyhow. What we need is more quota, rather than speed. Essentually we'll pay a premium to waste our puny quota allowances in a fraction of the time. It's great for future-proofing, but completely impractical at this point in time.
malai5
Apr 10, 2009 7:27 PM
"Future Proofing"???

It's going to take at least 8 years to roll it all out and sure it will be a great Fibre Optical system, BUT, who says that in 8 years time WiFi will not be so much better.
No matter how you cut it, cables, even if they are Fibre Optic do have physical limits, WiFi does not. At this time, with the cutting edge of sending power through the "air" to charge batteries etc, what is to say that the scope for upping the through put of WiFi isn't just a nano byte away.

Yes, an investment for the future, but a future that may turn out to be our present situation, sitting on an outdated system.

Cheers

Malai5
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Apr 10, 2009 7:29 PM
That is also true. But I'd rather have wired than wireless, there's enough shit going through the air as it is. Not to mention latencies. We'll have to wait and see.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

Box battle: Telstra takes on TiVo and Foxtel with T-Box trial in Melbourne
It's not quite Foxtel IQ and it's isn't TiVo either. The T-Box lets Telstra users watch movies and TV from the Bigpond site, as well as record and watch digital TV
 
5 More Free Linux Apps You Can't Do Without
More digital Swiss Army knife software, including Linux utilities and tools that are so useful you won't know how you ever did without them
 
Microsoft delivers Office 2010 public beta
Vendor details editions for Office 2010 along with application virtualisation for testing.
 


 
Intel
 
 
LogMeIn
 
 
Amazing Dell Coupons now available
 
Discover Apple