search technology reviews, news, features, group tests
Popular Searches:   video , dell , dvd
 |  Register
 |  Newsletters  | 
Sitemap  |  RSS
RSS
Monday November 23, 2009 6:26 AM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Australia's clean feed: Yes or no?
Australia's clean feed: Yes or no?
NEWS

Australia's clean feed: Yes or no?

by William Maher  on Mar 2, 2009
"NO! The Minster is flip flopping, scope creepying does not seem to have a > idea what the ploicy real is - Can't even answer questions from the senate estimates or even in Parlimeant (only those ..."
 
By all reports the Internet filtering trial is going ahead, but the Government's effort to filter ISP traffic is looking less and less popular.

One wonders what Senator Conroy's team thinks of the increasingly negative comments being heaped on their efforts to give Australia's Internet pipes a good going over with a bucket of Virtual Domestos.

It's not as if the Broadband Minister isn't doing anything else to stem the tide of criminal activity threatening kids online - in the latest plank in the $125.8 campaign, university researchers are looking into technical and behavioural measures children and parents can use to protect themselves from Internet predators.

Despite all this, the Government still can't seem to shake the belief that their Internet filtering proposal is going to do very bad things to the Internet in Australia.

The latest news that may have anti-clean feed advocates wondering if the whole thing will just be canned, is that the Opposition and Greens have been joined by another politicial protester against the idea.

The Opposition isn't opposed to tests themselves, but it's not exactly providing the endorsement the Government needs.

Throwing their voice into the mix is the Whirlpool site, which has published results of its 2008 Australian Broadband Survey. Whirlpool's news? That only 2% of Labor voters supported the filtering at the time of voting, so the Government has "no mandate" for filtering.

So far, various Australian ISPs have responded to the plans with skepticism. Mind you, if you think ISPs/Governments will never start policing what goes on via your Internet connection, it's already happening overseas here, and here.

 

Email a Friend Email this
Print Page Print this
Tweet This Tweet this
Feedback Send us your tips


Ads by Google

Comments: 2
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Reece
Mar 2, 2009 9:48 PM
"Despite all this, the Government still can't seem to shake the belief that their Internet filtering proposal is going to do very bad things to the Internet in Australia." One doesn't really have anything to do with the other. Some one please correct me if I am wrong (as i often am) but Sen. Conjob still has not clarified what he means by 'other unwanted material'. It would be beyond nievity for Conroy to say that he can not see the implications of leaving such an open back door to a secret list.
If i was part of a loud minority group, those 3 words would be music to my holier than thou ears.. Other Unwanted Material. Of all the subversive ways i could help the majority out there that arn't even aware they need my help, this would have to rate in my top 10.
Again if i am incorrect, let me know. Until then, it's time to come out Senator, or should I say come clean..


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Australia's clean feed: Yes or no??
By all reports the Internet filtering trial is going ahead, but the Government's effort to filter ISP traffic is looking less and less popular.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
mordie
Mar 2, 2009 10:53 PM
NO! The Minster is flip flopping, scope creepying does not seem to have a > idea what the ploicy real is - Can't even answer questions from the senate estimates or even in Parlimeant (only those that a feed to him by his own party - Dorethy Dixies (sp?) style)..

We have no meaning to what "unwanted content" is!
We have no oversight or appeal system to the ACMA Blacklist which is to be the manadatory filter.
We have no idea if they will add to the ACMA list behind the scenes and make more than CP sites banned - Political or otherwise.
The clean feed was orignally opt-in before the election and

The Minuister should be sacked for his incompetance in this whole affair - Even to the point of having one of his staffers Try and bull a well respected Network engineer into slience by writing to his Employer and a Group he is involved. (That alone should be enough to through him out!)... The minister has been ignoring industry advise.

The trial is not imparcial at all and using unknown ISPs with little numbers home user clients. Even one is a conflict of intersting in the CEO just happens to be on the committee behind the filter. That ISP been Webshield - This ISP ALREADY USES A FLITER.

only known isp is iprimus ... but considering their parents shares prices are 2 cent and been that for awhile gawd knows how long they will be around.

The Trial is a con to get the results the minister wants ... He's in bed with the ACL and other minority Lobby groups and it's a major concern...


Login or register to submit a comment.
 

Top Stories

Box battle: Telstra takes on TiVo and Foxtel with T-Box trial in Melbourne
It's not quite Foxtel IQ and it's isn't TiVo either. The T-Box lets Telstra users watch movies and TV from the Bigpond site, as well as record and watch digital TV
 
5 More Free Linux Apps You Can't Do Without
More digital Swiss Army knife software, including Linux utilities and tools that are so useful you won't know how you ever did without them
 
Microsoft delivers Office 2010 public beta
Vendor details editions for Office 2010 along with application virtualisation for testing.
 


 
Intel
 
 
LogMeIn
 
 
Amazing Dell Coupons now available
 
Discover Apple