The CG9 is the smallest camcorder on test and uses the same pistol-grip design as the larger Sanyo VPC-HD700 and HD1000 models on page 80. Unlike the HD700’s natural ergonomic feel, though, the CG9 is so small it can feel awkward to use for those with larger hands. Instead of the controls resting conveniently under the thumb, they lie further towards the palm, annoyingly just out of reach.

Aside from this slight inconvenience when trying to shoot, the camera is very portable and can easily fit in a trouser pocket, besides weighing just 200g.
The CG9 is as easy to use as it is to transport, featuring little in the way of physical controls, though various settings can be changed via the menu. The only frustration we encountered while using the device (aside from the ergonomics) was that the battery has to be removed to charge it, which requires unclipping a plastic side panel.

The CG9 is the cheapest camcorder in our test, so it was no surprise that it struggled in our quality tests. A paltry 40MB of internal storage is included, so you have to rely almost exclusively on SD cards for storage.

Although it is capable of capturing stills at an impressive 9.1 megapixels, its 640 x 480 video resolution is the lowest here. And while it has a reasonably large 1/2.33in sensor, the footage it captured was unimpressive. Images appeared grainy, and the lack of resolution failed to provide enough clarity to make images stand out. Even the high-res stills were poor, with images noisy and over-compressed.

Attempting to use the zoom stretched the CG9’s image stabilisation to, and beyond, its limits, especially at the huge 60x digital maximum. Low-light conditions led to more problems, with the automatic white balance adding a strange hue to rooms. High levels of noise were visible in dark scenes.

Due to the poor footage quality, and the lack of internal storage, the CG9 is best suited to short bursts for the web. But it’s expensive for a web footage camera, and stills fail to impress, so it’s hard to recommend on any front.