Thursday November 20, 2008 10:26 PM AEST
Skip Navigation LinksPC Authority > News > Nasa needs US$1bn to protect Earth from asteroids

Search News

Nasa needs US$1bn to protect Earth from asteroids

Mar 8, 2007
 | 2 Comments 
Tags: Nasa | $1bn | protect | Earth | asteroids
Congress says it's too much.
Nasa scientists have warned that it will cost too much money to track potentially dangerous asteroids and comets which could threaten the Earth.

In a report previewed by a Planetary Defence Conference in Washington on Monday, officials said it would cost about US$1bn to find and track around 90 per cent of the estimated 20,000 potentially hazardous near earth objects (NEOs) by 2020.

"We know what to do, we just don't have the money," said Simon Worden, director of Nasa's Ames Research Centre.

The report follows a request from US Congress in 2005 for Nasa to create a plan to find, track and possibly deflect the most dangerous NEOs.

Nasa already tracks some of the largest space debris, of at least 1,000m in diameter, but hopes to track smaller objects down to a diameter of 140m which are still large enough to cause major devastation.

These NEOs pose a significant threat even if they do not collide directly with the planet. If they were to touch the planet's atmosphere, the shockwaves created by explosions from the heat could still be catastrophic.

Nasa has offered three possible solutions. The first is to create a ground telescope dedicated to the job of hunting and tracking asteroids. This would work in conjunction with other agencies' telescopes and cost around US$800m.

The second, but most expensive, option is to launch a space infrared telescope dedicated to the job costing an estimated US$1bn.

The third, and cheapest, option would be to use existing telescopes from agencies around the world at a cost of around US$300m.

Unfortunately the White House has rejected the proposals, deeming them all too costly.

"The decision of the agency is that we just cannot do anything about it right now," said Nasa programme scientist Lindley Johnson.

Ads by Google

Comments: 2
gypsyman27
Jul 28, 2008 11:03 AM
The whitehouse said this is too costly?! I knew those people were short on brainpower but this is absurd. How can we put a price tag on keeping our planet safe? It's not like we have another that we can use as a backup! Beam me up Scotty, there are no intelligent leaders in the most powerful of nations of the earth!


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Nasa needs US$1bn to protect Earth from asteroids?
Congress says it's too much.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
Jim.Dude
Jul 28, 2008 11:31 PM
Two points.

1. We're more likely to die from a worldwide epidemic of some blood or airborne pathogen.
2. We're more likely to die from an insurgent who was never fed properly because we spend all our money on bombs and war and not on peace and bikinis.

And:
3. Ever notice how NASA always finds something really new and exciting at exactly the same time it's budget comes up for review!?
Login or register to submit a comment.


Post a review to WIN $3000 worth of tech prizes - Register now!
 
 
PC Authority Lifestyle - Home Cinema

PC Authority Magazine

Issue: 133 | December, 2008

Australia's premier computer magazine, PC Authority gives you the facts, opinions and insight to make informed PC and tech purchasing decisions.


PC Authority Magazine