«
FEATURE
AMD Barcelona
""It’s the first chip design in recent years to sport both the now-familiar level 2 cache – with 512MB per core " I think it should be 512kb."
Related Articles
Latest Features
Putting AMD’s constant claims of investment protection to the test, we were keen to upgrade an Opteron NEC WA2510 workstation from its twin dual-core Opterons up to a pair of our test 1.8GHz 2346HE quad-core Barcelona parts, making for an eight-core workstation. AMD has made much of the fact that the new processors protect investment by being physically and thermally compatible with older second-generation Socket F CPUs, claiming on numerous occasions that existing systems would be upgradable to the new parts with nothing more than a BIOS update.
 |
| The test results below were achieved by directly changing combinations of old and new Opterons in the same system. |
Compatible or not?
That may be true in the majority of cases, but certainly not all of them: the Tyan S2927 board in our three-month-old workstation doesn’t support the dual-power planes of Barcelona. The message here is not to make any assumptions and only consider switching out the CPUs in existing systems if you have a specific compatibility assurance for the motherboard model you own. So, unable to use the WA2510, Boston supplied us with a Barcelona-compatible rack-server system for testing (see opposite).
In terms of performance, Barcelona delivers no great surprises. To compare it core-for-core with the previous generation, we installed two dual-core Opteron 2214 CPUs in the Boston server, benchmarked and power-tested the system, and then replaced the two dual-core chips with just one of our test quad-core Barcelona parts. From the results, it seems that the new L3 cache isn’t doing Barcelona’s architecture many favours; the single quad-core Barcelona system came out slower in every test than the twin dual-core setup, including our multiple applications and multithreaded 3D tests. The clock-speed differential (1.8GHz against 2.2GHz), is a big factor in the old Opterons’ favour, of course, but we’d have hoped the new architecture would have closed the gap to a greater extent.
Power efficiency
When it comes to performance per Watt, the story continues to be interesting and far from clear cut. The 95W TDP (thermal design power) of the dual-core 2214 looks very hefty in comparison to the 55W of the 2346HE, and when you look at TDP per core it’s even clearer: 47.5W per core for the old part, compared to a mere 13.75W per core for the new. Monitoring power consumption during our 3ds Max test render – an extremely efficient user of all available cores – we were able to derive a performance-per-Watt factor from average power consumption in relation to the time taken to render the first frame.
Although the power consumption of the system fitted with a single Barcelona is lower than the twin dual-core setup, the raw performance deficit means that the old setup is more efficient, with a performance-per-Watt factor of 4.38 to the Barcelona’s 2.54. In other words, even though the system with a single Barcelona fitted uses less power, the longer time taken to complete the test means it used more energy overall.
The situation does change when it comes to a more realistic scenario, though. We directly replaced the two dual-core Opterons with two quad-core Barcelonas, taking the Boston system from its previous maximum of four cores up to a new complement of eight. In this configuration, the Barcelona Opterons thrash the old-generation parts in highly threaded code, for instance giving a 33-second time to first frame in our render test in comparison to 48 seconds with the old processors. And, true to AMD’s promise, the total platform power consumption didn’t rise, with our Supermicro test rig consuming around 210W during testing in both configurations. The good news on the power front continues, since the idle power of the new parts is lower than the old: the Boston system consumed 157W at idle populated with a pair of 2214s, but only around 138W with a pair of 2346HEs. That’s effectively four extra cores for free as far as power is concerned.
So the initial message for Barcelona is mixed: as far as power consumption goes, processor-for-processor replacement will certainly increase efficiency and performance-per-Watt. We’re a little underwhelmed by its absolute performance levels, though, and that’s before we’ve pitted it against comparably priced Intel Xeon parts. In our next round of benchmarks, we’ll pit the two against each other and also test their virtualisation credentials: an area that both sides claim is the ideal scenario for their server parts.
Copyright © 2009 Dennis Publishing
«
Comments
Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
If you're looking to buy an Apple product then this Friday is your lucky day, with Apple planning a "Black Friday" discount frenzy.
New broadband plans from Telstra with bigger download quotas are welcome, though you'll still find better value with the competition
TiVo have doubled their drive capacity, introduced IPTV capabilities, vast amounts of new content and better home networking options. But can the marketplace handle another content provider?