Apple fights Motorola, BlackBerry and Nokia for nano SIM standard

Apple fights Motorola, BlackBerry and Nokia for nano SIM standard

The nano-SIM will be a third smaller than the already tiny micro-SIM currently used in the iPhone

Apple has pitted itself against Motorola, BlackBerry and Nokia, all of whom are concerned over the control that Apple could have over upcoming nano-SIM card technology.

The FT reports the nano-SIM will be 30% smaller than the already tiny micro-SIM currently used in the iPhone, Motorola RAZR and the Nokia Lumia 800, and Apple is pushing to standardise a drawer-like housing for the card itself.

 

Image source: Giesecke & Devrient (G&D)

The nano-SIM will be approximately 12mm x 9mm, according to Giesecke & Devrient. They estimate the SIMs are 30% smaller than the micro-SIM and almsot 60% smaller than many SIMs in use around the world.

In doing so, other manufacturers will still be able to use Apple's design under license, but fear that Apple will end up owning all of the patents – something that is unlikely too well with the other mobile giants.

Nokia believes its own proposal has significant technical advantages but the final outcome won't be decided till next week. Either way the technology has the potential to result thinner phones, though it won't make swapping phones any easier.

This article originally appeared at Stuff.tv

Source: Copyright © Stuff.tv

See more about:  apple  |  nano  |  sim  |  blackberry  |  nokia  |  motorola
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia 

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia

 
Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
New Kira Ultrabook is a stylish, aspirational gem, according to Toshiba 

New Kira Ultrabook is a stylish, aspirational gem, according to Toshiba

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
Comments: 7
dbareis
22 March 2012
Hope it doesn't break anything putting it in the wrong way...


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Apple fights Motorola, BlackBerry and Nokia for nano SIM standard?
The nano-SIM will be a third smaller than the already tiny micro-SIM currently used in the iPhone

What do you think? Join the discussion.
photohounds
22 March 2012
I'd think Moto and Nok know a bit more about implementing phone design standards than someone with apple's me-only approach.

Heaven help everyone if gouging apple ever get to set a standard as important as this will become.

This should be a group effort - no patents no proprietary bullsh1t.
cootified
22 March 2012
Considering Nokia and Motorola used the same SIM sizes for more than 10 years without progress, I hardly think its Apple that doesn't know what they're doing.
The iPhone revolutionised the mobile industry for the exact same reason - no progress.

Same with the tablet market, hence the iPad has been seemed to be "revolutional" when it is only the meanigful progress to what tablet PCs should have been by now.
Santa
22 March 2012
Having just installed a micro sim into my new iPad3Gen 😁..... I think it is quite small enough! Honesty, I hardly think a 30% reduction on this will allow for "thinner phones". After all, "thin-ness" is governed by thickness not surface area! For gods sake ... Any smaller than micro and what are we supposed to do? Use tweezers?
Also, I don't really think phones need to get any thinner, well not until they install them as implants ( and I really doubt that size will have a sim slot )!
photohounds
22 March 2012
Really? What's actually 'wrong' with the current micro-sim???

'Revolutionised' - Oh yeah? It just shows when SOME discovered smart phones (late). These devices were beginning to flourish well before ICopyPrada-form-factor surfaced.

I had web access, hyper-linking to telephone numbers, easy cut-n-paste, word, spreadsheets (useless on a puny screen, better on a 4.8 incher), multitasking etc. well before apple greased their way onto the gravy train on the BACK of the work of others.

What SEMINAL work did they do?

Exactly Santa - tell me WHY do SIMs need to be so small you need tweezers?
So apple can revolutionise us into their wallets????

Time for a charade - Three words - initials FO and A. Because PRETENDING is NOT innovation.
pidasms
23 March 2012
My Samsung Galaxy S2 is actually thinner than an iphone, and it uses a full size SIM Smart phones are getting larger not smaller eg HTCs new 4G phone has a .5" screen, the rumoured Galaxy S3 a 4.8" and the Galaxy Note a 5" screen. Who needs a smaller SIM except those who want to make it difficult to swap phones? If I travel and want to put a new SIM in the phone i really want then t be all the same size, I also want my, my wifes, my sisters SIMs to be all the same size so we can swap them about when we want to use up some excess credit.Anyway neither I nor my wife care about "thin" phones, we have both got aftermarket 2600mAh batteries in with new larger back cover, so the phones actually last a full day of heavy use away from the charger (thats up to 12 hours using GPS for tracking, photos, emailing or MMS the photos, web browsing and media player on for hours). The supplied batteries with all these smartphones die after 4hrs of this, so who said the current smartphones are revolutionary? My old non touchscreen smart phone lasted 3 days of heavy use on a charge!
photohounds
24 March 2012
That IS a downside of bigger screens --- consumption.

There's a measured correlation between screen size and data usage. Easy to see, use it for MORE :)
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  0%
 
The PlayStation 4
  0%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  0%
TOTAL VOTES: 0

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads