Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome

Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome

Extension to stop ad networks tracking browsers

A privacy expert at Stanford University has released a Do Not Track extension for Google's Chrome browser, which could help end-users avoid being followed by some behavioural advertising companies.

The Do Not Track header is a technology and policy programme designed to allow consumers to opt out of tracking used by targeted advertising networks, but until now there had been no way of adding the feature to Chrome.

“The Chrome extension I developed adds the Do Not Track header (DNT: 1) to HTTP requests,” privacy specialist Jonathan Mayer said. “All the other major browsers have had a Do Not Track option for quite some time - this extension allows Chrome users to finally take advantage of Do Not Track.”

Although Google does include privacy options that retain opt-out cookies when a user deletes general browsing cookies, it has come under fire from privacy advocates for not implementing Do Not Track, even though the technology remains in its early stages.

“Google has steadfastly refused to add the feature to Chrome,” Mayer said. “Google's position has been heavily criticised by advocates, academics, and policy makers - including the FTC.”

Mayer was able to complete the tool after Google released a non-experimental version of the Chrome WebRequest API, which allows extensions to do much more to protect user security and privacy.

The scheme still has its shortcomings, however, and one of the criticisms is that advertisers are not legally required to take any notice of the presence of a Do Not Track header, which means unscrupulous websites could ignore privacy requests.

“Do Not Track is a preference-signalling mechanism, so yes, websites have to add support for it," Mayer said, adding that additional tools could be used to keep tracking companies honest.

“There was some early criticism of Do Not Track for being unenforceable, but that line has largely faded, partly because researchers have demonstrated again and again how web measurement tools can catch bad actors.”

The blocker is available from the Chrome web store, but Mayer cautioned that the extension requires Chrome 17 or later. For anyone running the default Release build, the extension will not successfully install until late January 2012, he said.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Source: Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing

See more about:  privacy  |  security  |  chrome
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday 

Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday

 
Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN 

Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN

 
Microsoft to pricing inquiry - we charge big bucks because we can 

Microsoft to pricing inquiry - we charge big bucks because we can

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Comments: 6
photohounds
16 January 2012
Good one ...


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Privacy expert adds "Do Not Track" to Google Chrome?
Extension to stop ad networks tracking browsers

What do you think? Join the discussion.
davsan
16 January 2012
Firefox already has an extension doing the same thing. It is called Ghostery. It blocks all trackers by choice. For example it has blocked 10 trackers on this site.
photohounds
17 January 2012
Thanks mate, ignorant of this until now, as I (and probably many others) thought 'private' browsing' would be enough. Anyway I've installed Ghostery :)

This tracking a type of CarrierIQ for browsers in a way ... and we know about all the noise THAT is making.

A bunch of Carriers installed it as did and ONE phone maker. Many have now hastily removed it to avoid the impending PR disaster. That phone maker seems to have easily brainwashed its fans into believing only bad old Android had it. Still some people will believe anything. Others are happy to be tracked by their browser.





Edited by photohounds: 17/1/2012 11:26:29 AM
amcmo
17 January 2012
just remember, this is a 'please don't track me', not a 'don't you dare track me'.

It's reliant upon them actually taking notice of your request.
elhombre
17 January 2012
Wouldn't a VPN be more effective?


amcmo wrote:
just remember, this is a 'please don't track me', not a 'don't you dare track me'.

It's reliant upon them actually taking notice of your request.
Eric
29 February 2012
Thanks for sharing good article
Comments have been disabled for this article.
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Federal Budget 2013: So what are you going to be required to pay?
15 May 2013
Opinion: Want a handy summary of the 2013 federal budget? Here is one by Newcastle accountants ...
Architects: another profession on the list of people using Evernote
10 May 2013
Yes, apparently the hugely popular Evernote note-syncing app is also being used by people who ...
In Brisbane? Setting up a business?
10 May 2013
Too embarrassed to ask even the most basic questions? Here's your chance to find out about ...
Worried about staff losing the office keys?
8 May 2013
Here's an interesting idea: a system which lets you assign a digital office "key" to your ...
Need a LOT more storage?
7 May 2013
Do you have multiple offices or servers? Are your systems requiring so much storage your IT ...

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 1719

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads