Opinion: Microsoft should make its own Windows 8 PCs

Opinion: Microsoft should make its own Windows 8 PCs

It's time for Microsoft to start making PCs, argues Nicole Kobie. Read her argument.

The PC world is stumbling, and if it falls it’s going to bring Microsoft tumbling down with it. But there’s a solution: it’s time for Microsoft to start making PCs.

The tech world is moving towards tablets and apps, and that could cause trouble for Microsoft in the long run. At the moment, more than nine in ten computers run Windows, but sales of PCs are essentially flat, while sales of smartphones, tablets and Macs are skyrocketing, posting growth well above traditional PCs for 22 consecutive quarters.

That all adds up to a stagnating market for Microsoft’s core software business, and it’s already starting to show, with its latest round of results showing weak PC sales were hurting Windows. Microsoft must do something.

Lining up to buy toasters

 

Intel already is. After failing to convince tablet and smartphone makers to use its Atom chips, Intel doled out $300 million to encourage manufacturers to create Ultrabooks – essentially, a PC version of Apple’s MacBook Air – to draw consumer attention away from the Apple Store. PCs have become commoditised appliances, and nobody lines up to buy toasters (until Apple releases the iToast, that is).

While cheap, boring PCs certainly have their place, their tight profit margins mean that manufacturers also need to compete at the high-end of the market to remain in the black. And who better to do that than Microsoft?

While starting a PC business might seem insane given the state of the market, Microsoft isn’t starting from scratch. It already has a hugely successful PC hardware business in the form of the Xbox – which is a PC in all but name. Yes, there were “red ring of death” issues early on, but that bit of hardware has helped the entertainment division contribute $9 billion in quarterly revenue, and proves the public will happily buy made-by-Microsoft hardware.

Friends and enemies

 

If Microsoft can’t ramp up its own manufacturing plant, it doesn’t have to. Microsoft’s latest round of results show it’s sitting on a US$57 billion mountain of cash. It could easily buy a PC maker; it might even be enough to tempt HP to change its mind about selling its PC business.

Regardless of how it’s made, a Microsoft PC has the potential to anger existing partners. But what’s Dell or Asus going to do: start running Ubuntu instead? Lovely as the Linux OS has become, OEMs are as locked into Windows as they’ve ever been. As long as Microsoft plays nicely with licensing fees, there’s no reason why they should lose out – quite the opposite if it drives consumer spending back to the PC market.

The vertical integration that works for Apple may not work for Microsoft, but it’s worth noting that Google certainly looks keen to follow the Mac-maker’s lead. First, there’s Google’s surprise purchase of Motorola, giving the web firm its own smartphones and tablets. And while its Chromebooks are made by Samsung and Acer, they are heavily Google-branded.

Bricks and mortar

 

Perhaps surprisingly, given the move to online shopping, retail stores are critical to Apple’s success. According to a retail report, Apple Stores are some of the most successful retail premises in the US, selling US$5,626 per square foot annually – more than posh jewellers Tiffany & Co. Microsoft stores already exist overseas; it’s time they had a bit more on the shelves.

Plus, as Microsoft stated at the launch of Windows 8, it believes every device should have a touchscreen – what better way to push that vision than to make touch laptops and all-in-ones itself? Apple defined the tablet market with the iPad; Microsoft could very well do the same with touch PCs.

This year's arrival of Windows 8 gives Microsoft the perfect opportunity to break into the hardware market. Instead of unveiling the new OS on a Dell, Asus or Acer, imagine if Microsoft unveiled the new OS perfectly optimised on its own slick Ultrabook, tablet or all-in-one PC. Is it too fantastic to picture people queuing around the corner to get into the Microsoft Store?

Have an opinion? Share it below.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Source: Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing

See more about:  opinion  |  microsoft  |  windows  |  pc
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Best Android apps this week 

Best Android apps this week

 
First Look: MSI Z87 Mpower MAX Motherboard 

First Look: MSI Z87 Mpower MAX Motherboard

 
Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Comments: 14
Dale61
4 January 2012
It will never happen! There is alreay enough hardware out there that struggles with MS software, so MS will then have to build pc's that only use proven hardware, and hardware that they are happy to use. Maybe they should release software that is compatible with existing hardware first, then consider what other options that may have.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Opinion: Microsoft should make its own Windows 8 PCs?
It's time for Microsoft to start making PCs, argues Nicole Kobie. Read her argument.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
happyo
4 January 2012
I would love it if MS did this, i would be in the queue for the new stuff, for to long MS has tried to be everything to everyone. its time that MS released its own purpose built hardware. Apple once let others build there hardware and supplied the OS like MS does and the result nearly killed apple, imagin how great windows could be if it was purpose built for its hardware like Mac OS.
Aslo Dale61 before knocking Microsoft compatible software go and see if anyone one else releases software that is better compatible, see how well Mac OS runs on $10 network card or Linux on a NVidia X1234 supper dupper video card.

the time has come for Microsoft to Build its own hardware thus raising the bar for other manafactures to aspire to. the same way Apple has with smart phones.
DJ...
4 January 2012
If MS start manufacturing hardware then they will be able to better integrate the hardware with their software. This would enable them to protect their hardware business by controlling their software releases. Great idea, but typical of Microsoft they would be again following in the footsteps of Apple. :-)

This seems very counter to the argument that PCs are better than Macs because there are many manufacturers offering competitive options to people.
PsychoNavigator
4 January 2012
*Disclaimer: This article was written by a macfag.
ory_zm
4 January 2012
Why a macfag? I'm a PC boy through and through and I think it's not a bad idea.

To all the other commentors, nobody says it has to be exclusive. They can build a machine with their own hardware with a Windows version that is optimised to run on that hardware and at the same time keep selling the current versions of Windows that are highly compatible. It would almost be like having the cake and eating it but who cares? win win for everyone.
petergaskin
4 January 2012
Given that MS are rather generous with the specs rerquired to run various versions of their operating systems, why do you think MS could actually build hardware that would actually utilise there operating systems? I had a pc with standard specs to run XP -250 ram and 40gb hard drive. This was probably close to doubnle the minimum specs to run XP. Yet over time, the pc died - just could not handle running XP. From experience I know that you need at least 500 ram to run XP - 4 times the minimum spec!
Also, pcs are made for different jobs - ie the specs for a gaming pc is much different to that of a pc to be used in encoding hd video.
Therefore, MS woudl have to build a range of pcs that will work for a given job.
notagain
4 January 2012
Nicole Kobie, i hear somw stupid unresearched ideas but yours takes the fruitcake.
What your saying is tha all the other manufacturers make hardware that is not compatible and isn't optimised to run windows.
Gigabyte, Seagate, Asus and all the others don't know how to make their products work efficiently. Nicole Kobie go and write some fantasy girly novels.
oscarcharliezulu
4 January 2012
My understanding is that the Xbox hw business runs at a loss, so while revenues are high, it LOSES money. They make it on sw and Xbox live. Also great way to push your partners to android on the desktop. Truly idiotic opinion. Time to innovate rather than cannibalise your own ecosystem. I agree, go and write some fantasy or kids books. Or go read arstechnica or allthingsd if your lacking a worthwhile idea.
oscarcharliezulu
4 January 2012
My understanding is that the Xbox hw business runs at a loss, so while revenues are high, it LOSES money. They make it on sw and Xbox live. Also great way to push your partners to android on the desktop. Truly idiotic opinion. Time to innovate rather than cannibalise your own ecosystem. I agree, go and write some fantasy or kids books. Or go read arstechnica or allthingsd if your lacking a worthwhile idea.
Freddie
4 January 2012
Geez, guys! Perhaps you didn't get the subject of this article - as happyo & ory_zm has already pointed out: M$ could (as Apple has already done) commission hardware to run Win8 efficiently. (Refer also to linux custom build.) For the rest of the hardware out there, they throw in all the other drivers they can. Perhaps they may consider a 'customisation' phase.
However, imo Apple always have had hardware dedicated to their OS, so why could M$ not do the same?
notagain: noise > null
Rwjones.medowie@gmail.com
5 January 2012
I have a PC, IPAD, and an Android phone and I love them all. Microsoft's antitrust issues in the past could be an issue in moving to make its own hardware. Microsoft have established a lot of industry partnerships that should be fostered not broken. Bad move to make own hardwarwe if you ask me.
The biggest problem I see with Windows is Software costs. You pay to much for software on a PC. I can get quite functional APPS on the apple store for $10.00 for my IPAD (mind manager apps for example) that would cost hundreds for a PC. This is wrong. Apple have its MAC store which is also cheaper in comparison to PC software.
Microsoft should establish its APP store and compete with Apple and Google by providing competative pricing for PC Users.
I dont think the PC is quite dead yet - there are many complex things you cant do on an IPAD which you can do on a MAC or PC and I dont ever see this gap being easily filled by Tablets until we have a technology leap in voice recognition.
photohounds
5 January 2012
Apple only started to license others to make hardware WHEN it was already on its knees. It was a reaction to the runaway success of Windows 95. (no I didn't understand W95's success at the time, either, but Gates &co . certainly seemed to)

This licensing may have been poorly managed by Apple, but it did not CAUSE the majority of the problems at the fruit shop.

Apple had fallen into the trap of making too many similar models that confused potential buyers. (note their phones and tablets have NO real diversity and this may be partly as a result of having once had too many models.
They stopped licensing system 7 in 1997 with the introduction of system 8.

Nicole, do you think M$ will feel pressured to do this just because doing that has enabled apple to come back from near bankruptcy, or because you've written this article?

M$ are NOT on their knees as far as I can see.
Windows PCs everywhere in large business. In reality they'd probably be better off with linux and a few good sysadmins than macs. Linux takes care of much of the 'back office' already without the great unwashed ever being aware ...

Perhaps Apple, channelling through their prophet, have already 'magically' divined the 'correct size' for all gadget appliances and do not need diversity. When one suggests something would work better bigger or smaller, depending on need the fans imply that 'we already HAVE the right size' - why you wanna change it, boy. (sounds more convincing with a southern accent :) )


.

Edited by photohounds: 6/1/2012 11:13:10 PM
glanjacksonn
6 January 2012
If MS alpha accomplishment accouterments again they will be able to bigger accommodate the accouterments with their software.They can body a apparatus with their own accouterments with a Windows adaptation that is optimised to run on that accouterments and at the aforementioned time accumulate affairs the accepted versions of Windows that are awful compatible.
photohounds
6 January 2012
Apple has become the McDonalds of computing in some non-edible ways.

Their business models contain many similarities - some glaring ones:

. Limited menu
. Lots of hype and 'mystique' for what is a simple product.
. Seemed somewhat 'unconventional' to others until they made a go of it.
. Product is made exactly the same from unit to unit so the user experience is "replicable" and cheap to support. "It works THIS way ... not how you want it"

Not sure how the fact that McDonalds sells hot apple pies that contain no apple, fits in to the model, but there you have it ...

Does that make iphones and their tablets "SMALL Macs"??? Ooh McDonalds - better watch the core! They might spot someone new to sue for daring to use "Mac" as a product name.


"The folks up the street all carrying their bling, I see this girl unpack her iThing.
Then I get it "wham" as clear as day, my pulse begins to hammer when I hear a voice say:
These boys have got this down ... there oughta be one of these in every town"

Apologies to MK.


.


Edited by photohounds: 14/1/2012 09:11:05 PM
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  23%
 
The PlayStation 4
  30%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  47%
TOTAL VOTES: 168

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads