Why you shouldn't get excited about PCI-Express 3.0 support

Why you shouldn't get excited about PCI-Express 3.0 support

Motherboards from ASRock, Gigabyte and MSI are touting support for PCI-E 3.0. But is it all just excited marketing?

Back at Computex 2011, MSI proudly pointed out that one of its motherboards, the Z68A-GD80 (G3), supported PCI-Express 3.0. Then last Friday ASROCK dropped by our offices and gave us a glimpse at an engineering sample of its upcoming high end Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 board. Nestled among the distinctive gold capacitors on this board were a couple of tiny NXP chips, which add PCI-E 3.0 support to the motherboard.

Then Friday afternoon ended with an announcement from Gigabyte of its new gaming board, the Z68 based G1.Sniper 2. We’d seen this board when it was tagged Z68-Gaming back at Computex, but Gigabyte had held one thing back in its early descriptions of the product –  support for PCI-Express 3.0.

Seeing as three out of the four main motherboard manufacturers are supporting PCI-Express 3.0 it seemed high time to have a look at what the benefits are. After some digging and chatting with industry figures it might surprise you to know that the current benefits of PCI-Express 3.0 are absolutely zero. In fact, if you pair one of these boards with their intended ‘Sandy Bridge’ second gen Core CPUs you won’t ever have PCI-Express 3.0 running.

The reason behind this is that, thanks to the move of traditional chipset features onto modern CPUs, the all-important high bandwidth PCI-Express graphics lanes tie directly into the CPU. There are PCI-Express lanes that run into the Z68 chipset on the motherboard, but these are used for lesser means, where bandwidth isn’t critical. These are devices like networking controllers, PCI-E SSDs and the like.

In a Z68 chipset for example, there are eight PCI-Express lanes available. Some of these get used by the motherboard to attach USB 3 or SATA 6GBps controller chips, while others drive the smaller PCI-E connectors on the motherboard. A Sandy Bridge CPU controls a further 16 lanes, which can operate one graphics card at full x16 speed or two cards at x8 speeds.

This allows the best possible communication between GPU and CPU but it also means that the PCI-Express connection is inexorably tied to the CPU. This means that, despite the fact motherboards are now shipping with PCI-E 3.0 support, we won’t actually see any of these slots running at PCI-E 3.0 speeds until the launch of Intel’s ‘Ivy Bridge’ CPUs next year.

Even then PCI-E 3.0 will only come into its own when graphics cards support it as well. Once you have both CPU and graphics card support you’ll be able to tap into the effectively doubled bandwidth of the latest PCI-Express specification, but for now support is only there as a future proofing attempt by motherboard manufacturers.

In other words, it is nice to have, but would only be considered an essential buy if you planned to upgrade your CPU when Ivy Bridge and the new generation graphics hardware hits the market sometime next year. Because Ivy Bridge is the 22nm process shrink of Sandy Bridge and not a new architecture, one doubts that there will be the kind of huge performance jump that would make upgrading from the current range of Intel Core CPUs worthwhile. 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  pciexpress  |  motherboard  |  pcbuilder  |  pcbuilding
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday 

Samsung Galaxy S4 hits Australia this Saturday

 
Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN 

Preparing for the future - How the evolution of the PC highlights the importance of the NBN

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 officially unveiled - yes, it makes phone calls too 

Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 officially unveiled - yes, it makes phone calls too

 
Comments: 1
Nato
8 August 2011
Nice to have when ivy bridge does come out for the mainstream platform, I myself wont be bothering with the 1155 socket stuff, No one as yet has any performance results on the 'real' new platform being the new 2011 socket cpu's. They may be based on the 'sandy bridge' arcitecture but no one knows for sure what intel has lerking in the dark. Im hoping they beef up the single core performance myself cause thats what i need more for warcraft :) 4 cores and extreme to say the least in 25 man raids at max settings. My i7 930 at 3.6ghz still cant do more than 15fps when doing onyixa 25 when the welps come out. Thats an extreme example but needed if u want the 10 sec acheivment :)
I hope amds 'bulldozer' is really good to bring down the prices as they both are set for release about the same time. As for pci-e 3 it wont make a difference for what in need the computer for.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Why you shouldn't get excited about PCI-Express 3.0 support?
Motherboards from ASRock, Gigabyte and MSI are touting support for PCI-E 3.0. But is it all just excited marketing?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 1719

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads