Thunderbolt - more than a funky name

Thunderbolt - more than a funky name

Intel has announced that its Light Peak technology now has a name, and is already appearing on the new Macbook Pros. But just what does this new tech entail?

When Intel demoed its Light Peak technology last year it blew many a mind. Building upon years of work in Silicon Photonics (semiconductor based lasers) it delivered a massive 100Gbps throughput over a single optical cable. Since then all sorts of rumours about Lights Peak have landed, from it being designed at Apple’s behest to it losing the laser part in its initial, much earlier than expected, deployment.

It turns out that the rumours were indeed true. For Intel has just announced that the technology once known as Light Peak has landed. Now called Thunderbolt, it can be found on Apple’s new range of Macbook Pros, and only there, as it has also been revealed that the technology will be exclusive to Apple until 2012.

The rumours about the switch from optical to copper are also true. Thunderbolt uses standard copper cabling, which means that a lot of the sheer awesomeness of Light Peak is gone. There is a limit of 3m to cabling, where optical effectively has no limits, and the maximum throughput has dropped tenfold to 10Gbps – still impressive but only double that of USB 3.

What really is ingenious is Apple and Intel deciding to pair Thunderbolt with Displayport, which is finally getting traction outside of Apple products (and is ironically being spearheaded by Intel’s main competitor, AMD). The latest Displayport specification allows for the daisy chaining of monitors, and surprise, surprise Thunderbolt is also designed for daisy chaining. A single Thunderbolt port can run up to six devices, including two monitors.

 

Double the throughput of USB 3.0, but exclusive to Apple till 2012.

Part of the inherent flexibility of Thunderbolt comes from its PCI-Express origins. Both technologies were developed by Intel, and while PCI-Express is the de-facto PC interconnect on both Intel and AMD systems, Thunderbolt actually requires the use of an Intel chip to work (we have asked Intel for some clarification on whether Thunderbolt will be possible on non-Intel systems and are awaiting an answer). This chip takes both x4 PCI-Express and Displayport signals and combines them into a single stream. This stream is then decoded by an Intel chip on the other end of the cable and split back into PCI-Express and/or Displayport.

There are many advantages to this, the biggest of which is that because the computer sees Thunderbolt devices as PCI-Express ones there is no need for special interface drivers like there is with USB. It also ensures future scalability of the technology – PCI-Express’ Lane based construction was designed from the ground up to scale as bandwidth needs increase simply through the addition of more lanes.

It is important to also note that this isn’t the death knell for USB. Thunderbolt is targeted at devices with high bandwidth needs – an external hard drive, for example, is still limited by the speed at which its platters spin, and USB 3 has more than enough bandwidth for it. The only Thunderbolt peripheral announced so far is Lacie’s Little Big Disk, which uses raided SSDs in order to deliver the kind of speeds promised by the technology.

We have asked a few more questions of Intel and will be checking out the new Macbook Pros later today. Until actual peripherals hit the market though we will have no real idea of how Thunderbolt will perform in the real world.

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  thunderbolt  |  apple  |  intel
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Opinion: On the inherent stupidity of declaring a winner in the next generation console wars. 

Opinion: On the inherent stupidity of declaring a winner in the next generation console wars.

 
Photos: Samsung's Aussie Galaxy S4 launch 

Photos: Samsung's Aussie Galaxy S4 launch

 
80+ Silver Power Supply Units set to be the new normal. 

80+ Silver Power Supply Units set to be the new normal.

 
Watch the Samsung Galaxy S4 launch 

Watch the Samsung Galaxy S4 launch

 
First Impressions: Tomb Raider on PC 

First Impressions: Tomb Raider on PC

 
Comments: 11
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
25 February 2011
'Light Peak' was a much better name. Thunderbolt sounds so... well, corny.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Thunderbolt - more than a funky name?
Intel has announced that its Light Peak technology now has a name, and is already appearing on the new Macbook Pros. But just what does this new tech entail?

What do you think? Join the discussion.
rubaiyat
25 February 2011
Agreed. Although we can claim an Aussie connection:

http://www.halenet.com.au/~jvbryant/thunderb.html

Flash Dick has a certain ring to it.

Any other suggestions? :)
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
25 February 2011
Flash Dick Female Connector, Flash Dick Male Connector

I can see that catching on.
petergaskin
25 February 2011
Interesting that Intel has introduced Sandy Bridge with thunderbolt is a sure sign of desperation on Intel's part. Surely people remember that the initial batches of Sandy bridge motherboards had a design flaw!
What is confusing is the fact that Intel intends to eventually include USB3 on their motherboards.
The big question is - why give a better product to Apple? Why not give the smae support to pc users?
Where is intel actually heading - no thuderbolt for pcs until next year?
anthonyqld
25 February 2011
And by giving it exclusive to Apple means no devices will support it. Great move Intel. Apple has a very small market share, so what kind of company will make devices for such a small userbase.
rubaiyat
25 February 2011
Intel is giving it to Apple, because they designed it in collaboration. As I understand it Apple gave it to Intel as a design proposal. For a start it uses the same connector as Apple’s Mini DisplayPort.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/26/exclusive-apple-dictated-light-peak-creation-to-intel-could-be/

Who would give it to PC manufacturers who are still sticking VGA and PS/2 ports on their machines?

Who better to give it to than the one company all the others copy?
kevin_watters
26 February 2011
Nice idea, but I am sure it will go the way of the firewire 800 port on the back of my Mac... never used !
rubaiyat
26 February 2011
Get a FW800 external HD and you certainly will appreciate that FW port.

So much faster and smoother than USB 2.0.

I haven't used USB 3.0 so don't know if that has totally fixed what was wrong with the previous version. But it looks like USB 3.0 may end up a forgotten blip on the technological radar if Thunderbolt takes off.

Peter
petergaskin
26 February 2011
By the time we see thunderbolt for pcs, usb 3 will be strongly in place. Despite intel's decision not to support usb 3 at this moment, motherboard manufacturers have decided in many cases to provide a third party usb3 controller device on their new motherboards. So usb 3 will be more than just a flash in the pan!
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
26 February 2011
rubaiyat wrote:
Intel is giving it to Apple, because they designed it in collaboration. As I understand it Apple gave it to Intel as a design proposal. For a start it uses the same connector as Apple’s Mini DisplayPort.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/26/exclusive-apple-dictated-light-peak-creation-to-intel-could-be/

Who would give it to PC manufacturers who are still sticking VGA and PS/2 ports on their machines?

Who better to give it to than the one company all the others copy?


Intel didn't give anything to Apple. There is no exclusive here. Any manufacturer is free to implement the technology. They just chose not to waste resources doing so because there will be very little products utilising it for a while yet. Remember DisplayPort? Only recently have a significant portion of peripherals taken advantage of it. Here's a recent source of information: http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/intel-refutes-apple-exclusivity-for-thunderbolt-i-o-lacie-and-p/

PC manufacturers rarely use VGA. Some laptops still have VGA connections because that's the interface many projectors use. PS/2 ports are on many motherboards because they can - you're free to use the array of USB 3.0 ports that all modern motherboards feature.

Thunderbolt serves a different purpose to USB. One does not replace the other. Intel themselves have said this. While the expensive Thunderbolt technology works well for applications such as RAID array storage and streaming heavy loads of data, USB 3.0 is cheap, backwards compatible, sufficiently fast for most applications (4.8Gb/s isn't exactly slow), and easily expansible via hubs. Most people don't even need USB 3.0, at this point Thunderbolt is a luxury. eSATA is common these days, which is plenty for external backup solutions for the average consumer. On the other hand, displays can either use DisplayPort or dual-link DVI.

Thunderbolt has its place, for sure. It's designed for specific uses, not as a general solution like USB. Will PC manufacturers implement it? More than likely, at an appropriate time. Much like Firewire, the main circle of users who will actually care are those working with video.
rubaiyat
27 February 2011
Didn't say Intel is giving the technology to Apple exclusively.

Manufacturers are jumping on Thunderbolt already, for obvious reasons:

Quote:
Once we were approached [by Intel] about this, it was a no-brainer,” Promise product manager Billy Harrison told Macworld. “The performance, with 10 Gigabits, dual channel, bidirectional…that’s extremely appealing.


There is also the prospect of a single hub for all devices. Nice!

We don't know the price yet, but USB 3.0 costs more than USB 2.0 and doesn't get the eternal mating call of the PC User, "It's too expensive!"

I was thinking about this today as I went to the local agricultural show, how people's brains 'work'.

We are perpetually told by consumers, politicians and reviewers, amongst others, what we 'can't afford'. Apparently $5 ice creams and $6 Pluto Pups, and piles of junk in show bags, aren't amongst those things 'out of our reach'



Edited by rubaiyat: 27/2/2011 05:05:21 AM
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  17%
 
The PlayStation 4
  29%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  54%
TOTAL VOTES: 1305

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads