Analyst slams Isuppli for Moore's Law death prediction

Analyst slams Isuppli for Moore's Law death prediction

An Isuppli reportpredicting the death of Moore's Law by 2014 has analysts close to Intel breaking out in hives.

"Don't believe the idiots writing these things," we were told by an industry insider after asking him whether he thought Isuppli's view that high costs of semiconductor manufacturing equipment would kill off Moore's Law in just five years was accurate.

In a statement, Isuppli's director and chief analyst, Len Jelinek yesterday suggested that "The usable limit for semiconductor process technology will be reached when chip process geometries shrink to be smaller than 20 nanometers (nm), to 18nm nodes" and that "at those nodes, the industry will start getting to the point where semiconductor manufacturing tools are too expensive to depreciate with volume production, [that is], their costs will be so high, that the value of their lifetime productivity can never justify it."

But according to In-Stat's chief technology strategist, Jim McGregor, a lot of companies are facing financial difficulty at the moment due to over expansion in the industry and the general economy, and this "has nothing to do with this argument."

McGregor told the INQ, "even Gordon Moore has predicted the end of Moore's Law twice, but he was wrong both times." Reassuring indeed.

According to McGregor, Moore's Law - the observation that the number of transistors that can be placed on an integrated circuit doubles roughly every two years - is "a key fundamental driver of the industry from an economics perspective." Future challenges, says McGregor emphatically, will most likely be down to technology issues rather than equipment costs, so Isuppli is spouting nonsense.

Indeed, every new technology goes over some road-bumps, especially involving start-up costs, but these tend to drop rapidly once moved into regular production. "EUV [extreme ultraviolet] will likely be the next significant technology to go through this cycle," McGregor told us.

McGregor did concede that the lifecycle of certain technologies is being extended by firms who are in some cases choosing not to migrate to every new process node, but he maintained new process tech is still the key driver of small design geometries, including memory density, logic density, power consumption, etc.

"Moore's Law also improves the cost per device and per wafer," added McGregor, who also noted that "the industry has and will continue to go through changes because of some of the cost issues." These include the formation of process development alliances, like IBM's alliances, the transition to foundry manufacturing, and design for manufacturing techniques like computational lithography.

"Many people have predicted the end of Moore's Law and they have all been wrong," sighed McGregor. The same apparently goes for those foolhardy enough to attempt to predict changes in the dynamics of the semiconductor industry.

"There have always been challenges to the semiconductor technology roadmap, but for every obstacle, the industry has developed a solution and that will continue as long as we are talking about the hundreds of billion of dollars in revenue that are generated every year," he concluded.

 

 

Source: theinquirer.net (c) 2010 Incisive Media

See more about:  intel  |  cpu  |  moores  |  law  |  business
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia 

Telstra supports International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia

 
Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
Comments: 2
Nato
18 June 2009
Yeah it wont stop for a fair while id say, i do think at the moment it has slowed down in the last year for sure. My poor old amd 4800x2 that gets 2000 cpu score in 3dmark06 released 05/05 is still waiting to be doubled in performance 4 years later, I know the transistor count is meant to double every 18 months but performance seems to have taken a back seat. The intel e8600 gets 3100 cpu in 3d06 so im hoping the new i5 duel cores blow my socks off with over 4k. I think the better the cores the better comp will run with games since the new i7 running a single or duel core game aint worth the extra $$$ at all. Its all about FPS in games and the latest quads are not cutting the mustard for an 2009 spec comp. A new computer should be better in every way, not just better when using new multi-threaded applications


Comment made about the PC Authority article:
Analyst slams Isuppli for Moore's Law death prediction ?
An Isuppli reportpredicting the death of Moore's Law by 2014 has analysts close to Intel breaking out in hives.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
Hobo_Joe
18 June 2009
I think it's kind of hard to draw that conclusion. You still have to take into account that most games these days still aren't being created with support for multiple CPU cores.

To an extent, the software has to keep up with the hardware. How can you get the most out of a Quad-Core CPU if the software doesn't know what to do with it?
If games started being designed for multiple cores then I think you'd notice an improvement.
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Poll

Which side are you choosing in the new console wars?



or View results
The Xbox One
  23%
 
The PlayStation 4
  31%
 
A console? Good Lord no - PC for me thanks!
  46%
TOTAL VOTES: 152

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads