Opinion: The PC is far from dead

Opinion: The PC is far from dead

The PC is far from dead, it's just in sleep mode, argues Barry Collins.

IBM, HP, Apple, even our own Jon Honeyball: the list of people queuing up to wallop another nail into the PC’s coffin is growing. I realise as a writer for PC & Tech Authority I may sound like a turkey trade union leader voting to abolish Christmas, but they’re all – in my rarely humble opinion – wrong.

First, let’s start by deconstructing what the naysayers mean by a “post- PC era”. In the case of the late Steve Jobs, he seemed to be arguing that the PC will no longer be the primary device for accessing the internet at home.  I couldn’t agree more.

Drivers and patches

With hindsight, it seems ludicrous that, for the best part of 15 years, people like my dad have had to install poorly coded drivers, download huge patches and pay annual protection money to antivirus firms, for a PC that takes two or three minutes to boot up, just so he can browse the web and read his emails. Compare that to the iPad experience: press the power button, swish the screen lock, dab the Safari logo, and you’re browsing the net in seconds.

For people like my dad it’s a no-brainer; for me it is too. The money I had mentally set aside for my triennial home laptop refresh has instead been lavished on an iPad 2, so I can benefit from instant-on browsing, read the electronic version of the SMH without having to brave the shops on a Saturday morning, and divert the kids from committing hara-kiri on long car journeys.

Does that mean my laptop will soon be joining the PlayStation 2 and the George Foreman grill in my loft?  Does it hell.

Heavy lifting

For starters, I have to work for a living (those iPad 2s don’t pay for themselves, no matter what the more conspiracy minded commenters on the PC & Tech Authority website may think). Even if you could find a tablet keyboard that didn’t want to make you chew your eyebrows off in despair, you’d have to be insane to want to work full-time on a device with no file system (at least in the case of iOS), no access to company servers, and where “multitasking” means working in one app at a time. It’s only when you’re forced away from Microsoft Word and Outlook that you realise how irreplaceable they are: try to search for the email with the Excel spreadsheet your boss sent you last month using the iPad mail client. Go on, I dare you.

Then we come to all the other things we do with our PCs, such as digital photography and video. Yes, there are some superb photo-editing apps on tablets, some of which – such as Snapseed on iOS – can even handle the RAW files DSLR owners shoot. But there’s nothing to match the fine level of editing control offered by Photoshop Elements, let alone Lightroom or full-blown Photoshop. You won’t find a tablet with sufficient processing grunt and storage to edit HD video, let alone the software to do so.

Data warehouse

 

And what are we supposed to do with the hundreds of gigabytes, if not terabytes, of photos, videos and documents stored on our hard disks? Where are we going to keep it all? “Turns out that the cloud, in the shape of internet-hosted and provisioned services, is just fine at taking on that role for you,” argues Jon Honeyball. It’s rare that I disagree with Jon, but on this occasion he’s talking out of his Thunderbolt ports. Spotify is a wonderful service (if you live in a country where it works), but it’s only a substitute for your music collection if you don’t like The Beatles, Oasis or the gazillions of other artists not affiliated with the company. And you’d have to live somewhere with ubiquitous broadband/3G, which pretty much rules out Australia.

Neither will the typical broadband connection cope with full-scale migration of data to the cloud. I have 212GB of photos, music and other files I’d like to keep stored on my PC, all backed up to hard disk. If I were to follow Jon’s suggestion and shove this all into the cloud, at my maximum ADSL upload speed of 0.6Mbits/sec (I can’t get cable), it would take more than a month of solid uploading. In which time I’d have burst my ISP’s datacap four times over, and had to pay a company such as SugarSync $25 (or $250 for the year) to look after all my data. And as I established last month, trusting a single cloud company is folly, so you’ll want that data duplicated at twice the cost. $600 a year to replace a $100 hard disk? No thanks.

The PC isn’t dead to me, nor to the tens of thousands of programmers, enthusiasts and tinkerers who read this magazine. It isn’t even dead to my dad. It might not be flavour of the month, but force me to choose between my PC and my iPad, and I know which I’d keep.

 

Source: Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.

See more about:  pcbuilder  |  tablets  |  opinion  |  cloud
 
 

Readers of this article also read...

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled 

Toshiba's new 2013 laptops unveiled

 
Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H 

Exclusive First Look: Gigabyte's Z87X-UD3H

 
Best Android apps this week 

Best Android apps this week

 
Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone" 

Unboxed: LG's Optimus G "Superphone"

 
Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war 

Google's new Chromebook Pixel bests MacBook Pro in the ppi war

 
Comments: 9
Haratu
20 October 2011
I totally agree, cloud based systems are useless when you need to rely on a fast running machine. If you have a family you have perhaps 4 people using the internet at once. If they are all using cloud computing then you need an excellent infastructure in place with good speeds and bandwidth. And this is just if there is a connection. There is also the issue of what to do if the connection is unavailable, on roaming, or is having trouble.
Computer developers often think all their customers live in dense cities that keep their infrastructure up to date and able to handle population booms.


Comment made about the PC & Tech Authority article:
Opinion: The PC is far from dead?
The PC is far from dead, it's just in sleep mode, argues Barry Collins.

What do you think? Join the discussion.
ory_zm
20 October 2011
Couldn't agree more!
A tablet is great, but it needs a machine in the background to support it, and I don't see that changing any time soon.
rubaiyat
20 October 2011
Haratu wrote:
Computer developers often think all their customers live in dense cities that keep their infrastructure up to date and able to handle population booms.


Developers think everyone is like them.

Years ago certain Sun executives who thought that making heaps of money in California's I.T. industry, made them somehow magnificently prescient, were going around saying that the solution to all the 3rd world's problems was to get on the Internet.

This ignored that first the 3rd world needed the electricity they didn't have to run the telecommunications they didn't have to run the Internet they didn't have.

It would also be helpful if they didn't have to spend half their day carrying clean water from the reticulated supply they didn't have.

And let's not ignore the money they don't have because the first world likes to take their resources but stiff arm them if they try and get a slice for themselves.

Edited by rubaiyat: 20/10/2011 04:17:03 PM
Nato
20 October 2011
Good article, i agree, at this point in time.
To me this is only the begining though, so what we have now rules in your arguments favor. But the rules will change. Net speeds and capacities will keep geing faster and bigger, at what point will that overtake the data that you have collected over your life? how long, i have no idea but make no mistake, it will happen.
Nato
20 October 2011
As for tablets, they are only in there infancy so i would dare say in not to distant future you will be able to run multible apps at once, all voice contolled or i could even go as far as a device in your pocket that projects a holographic image controled by voice and hands. Its all possible in time.
woogaman
22 October 2011
G'day all.I won't start this with a "(And)". Just because the CEO's are jumping off the cliff. Will You???
Now I am writing this on maybe one of the first transformers which go back. An Acer C300 laptop/tablet.
I bought as faulty. Myself knowingly better of that time new it was something else. I ran the last version of Linux in virtual & I was so happy to see the touch screen come to life.
Now this babe has a firewire/2 usb/CDR/Rw/DVD Rom/Pcmia slots & blue tooth & wifi standard that can be upgraded to wireless b/g/n expansion. A smart card reading slot for security.I have a card with four more usb 2 ports on her.Just to think she takes ram of the same as my Acer Exstensa's of just a tinny 333MHz Pc 2700.
But knowing I can go from 1.5GHz to 1.8GHz for the cpu.Then I could just slip in 2gig's of 400Mhz Just to see if the clock will run faster for the ram.
Saying all of this I have not seen a tablet let alone a lappy that will do what I want. Not the CEO of some company speaking for share holders.
Because of this lappy's connectivity I will live in the past. Because I have not seen nothing in the future that has what this machine has.
Still running on it's original battey.Now for a laptop it's flat out being two years today or going back to HP.
Now of the same age I have that Exstena & all that failed that on was being a P4 2.8GHz & having fans like on a motorcycle.I bought a second one for a spare & when I do my baby up she will have the latest wifi & blue tooth.
I have just helped a mate down the road with a 64bit Asus & it was running slower than Melbourne traffic.
A laptop less than 6 months old has the best up grade is a HDMI port & 3 usb ports. It might have the potential of gaming on that small screen.
But don't have the ability to do if I want to put in a serial card for programming a rom chip.
There is no tablet that will knock this machine of the her seat.Yah can keep the rubbish.It just won't last or do the J O B!

Cheers Dan.
woogaman
22 October 2011
PS:Forgot about the lan 10/100/1000.Yes gigabyte back then & still at the top.Because routers & hubs are not all Gigabyte.But this girl is.Get a tablet to do that now!
woogaman
22 October 2011
This is a ps of a ps:Now I did a lot of home work on the samsung wave on cnet & other places.I came to the conclusion most didn't know how to use the device.But I did pick out people who loved the machine.
I bought one.I have never had a problem with it & it is always surprising me with new little tricks it has stashed away.As a touch ph with a gig cpu & I can go to 32gig of extra memory.
Plus extra's the Galaxy doesn't have.So the wave was the JOB for me.It has not let me down.Also running Bada 1.0. But I have searched & found the upgrade to Bada 1.2.
As I rebuild laptops & have to reinstall Os's & I have Hp ipaqs from the past.
Now a lot of Aussies can't make it like myself to the mother website of hp because of the pin heads in Canberra.
So it will be a pin head attack on their so called we are going to speed all up to have it chopped off.Thats sad I cannot up date from hp.com because of these pin heads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photohounds
22 October 2011
Pinheads in Canberra?

How to your (not their) politicians cause you you be unable to access the HP site? Am I barking up the WT here??
Comments have been disabled for this article.

Latest Comments

Latest Competitions

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag! 

Win a PC copy of DEFIANCE plus a Hellbug figurine and messenger bag!

Win a Defiance prize pack and join the fight now!
 

Latest Poll

Which broadband network do you think is the best choice for Australia?



or View results
The Coalition's.
  19%
 
Labor's.
  63%
 
Screw this I'm going back to smoke signals and string on a can.
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 1637

Vote now
Ads by Google

From our Partners

PC & Tech Authority Downloads